User talk:CDPorter

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by -noah- was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Noah 💬 15:17, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, CDPorter! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Noah 💬 15:17, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Clarityfiend was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Clarityfiend (talk) 04:49, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, CDPorter. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Joseph Andre (music director), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment on potential sources for Will Osborne (singer)[edit]

I just read your post on the Osborne article's talk page, and one sentence caught my attendion: "Unfortunately though, to recreate this page accurately would require relying on source material that perhaps many editors & authors across Wikipedia will probably look down upon, that being contemporary trade magazine and newspaper sources."

I encourage you to use such sources. Most of my work on Wikipedia is on actors, actresses, radio, and TV from years gone by. I regularly use newspaper articles from The New York Times, publications at Newspapers.com and articles from trade publications (primarily Billboard, Broadcasting, and Variety.

I just wanted to express my support for your approach. Eddie Blick (talk) 00:19, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for replying. I'll get on working on this over the summer. I use all of those sources you listed along with plenty of others quite regularly. I've seen your contributions to this article before, and it was some of them that got me inspired enough to look into Will to begin with back in 2019.
One thing I've asked myself over and over though through the years, is if it would be right to note in a sentence or so of the existence of this book I'm making. There is one credible source of big band swing authority that has mentioned it, however their information on it is nearly three years out of date, that being the original release date of 2021 or early 2022. I'd completely understand it however if even mentioning this would be the wrong move. The last thing I would want to do here is "cringe-ify" and advertise on the internet's most sacred and important encyclopedic project. Maybe an addition to an External Link? Or something else? I'm just cautiously curious is all.
- CDPorter CDPorter (talk) 09:46, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know the answer to the question about mentioning your book. I don't have any source of my own like that, so I have never looked into that situation.
I appreciate your cautious approach to Wikipedia. I wish more editors felt as you do. Too many of them add content with no regard for credibility of sources (or even existence of sources). Eddie Blick (talk) 20:00, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
They truly damage the overall credibility of this essential--yet universally ostracized hypocritically--encyclopedia whether purposefully or indirectly. CDPorter (talk) 16:36, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]