User talk:BurningBlaze05

Welcome![edit]

Hello, BurningBlaze05, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Volten001 ^talk 12:21, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm TylerBurden. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Kevin Magnussen, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. TylerBurden (talk) 21:11, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for that, I just saw the Wikipedia article of Dennis Lind, and it mentioned Kevin being his cousin and Jan being his Uncle.

So yeah, sorry for that. BurningBlaze05 (talk) 08:43, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, if it has a source confirming it you could use the same source if you want to add it to the Kevin Magnussen article. TylerBurden (talk) 22:26, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks for your help! BurningBlaze05 (talk) 06:19, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Razvan Umbrarescu (June 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Razvan Umbrarescu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 19:23, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BurningBlaze05! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 19:23, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bastian Buus (August 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SportingFlyer was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bastian Buus and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SportingFlyer T·C 20:59, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Louis Sharp (August 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

All statements need to be sourced, starting with the date of birth. I also have notability concerns, since all sources are from one location, barring a 404 (which appears to just be a listing), and the subject's employer.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Louis Sharp and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 17:41, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the tip :) BurningBlaze05 (talk) 17:53, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tuukka Taponen (September 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Citadeol was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tuukka Taponen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Citadeol(talk) 09:54, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kacper Sztuka for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kacper Sztuka, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kacper Sztuka until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tuukka Taponen (October 17)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kline was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Dropping 15 sources for the same article does nothing. You have to prove that there is multiple, significant and independent sources who do cover WP:GNG.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tuukka Taponen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kline • talk to me! • contribs 20:48, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday[edit]

I want to wish a happy sixteenth birthday to you Katrina and thank you for your work on Wikipedia.

User:BurningBlaze05 Thank you, didn't know I contributed that much though. I'll have to wait for June to return the favour of saying happy birthday!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Louis Sharp (October 25)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spinster300 was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Louis Sharp and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spinster300 (talk) 06:39, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, BurningBlaze05. Thank you for your work on Răzvan Umbrărescu. User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. Prose/ text needs developing. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:51, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joseph Loake (November 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by M4V3R1CK32 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Formula Scout is not an appropriate source for BLPs -- does not demonstrate it meets WP:RS. Sources are primarily WP:ROUTINE coverage or primary.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Joseph Loake and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

M4V3R1CK32 (talk) 00:26, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 30[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bastian Buus, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Thai and GT. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, won't do that again BurningBlaze05 (talk) 07:36, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manuel Espírito Santo (December 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CurryTime7-24 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Manuel Espírito Santo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CurryTime7-24 (talk) 21:07, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bruno del Pino (December 18)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rich Smith was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Doesn't pass WP:NMOTORSPORT I'm afraid, unless I'm missing something

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bruno del Pino and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

- Rich^T|C|E-Mail 19:17, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft pages[edit]

Hello BurningBlaze!

I can't lie, I've read some of your drafts, and they seem ready to go! I don't see why they keep getting declined e.g. the Tuukka Taponen one. I just wanted to say hi and I love what you are doing. I'll try help out on some of your drafts and maybe you could give me a hand on mine! I've got a few drafts waiting in the wings as I only want to make two or three at a time.

Thanks! Certified Formula Neek (talk) 17:06, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's the biggest compliment I could get! Thank you so much! BurningBlaze05 (talk) 18:11, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be happy to help with your drafts! I've been meaning to do some for MacIntyre, Fairclough and others. (And because I don't like working on drivers younger the me (my brain just stops me for some reason) so you making pages on Al Dhaheri and Lammers are helpful. BurningBlaze05 (talk) 08:40, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i've just been working on Macintyre's karting record, I can't find anything for Fairclough. Certified Formula Neek (talk) 08:58, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could you maybe complete my Nakamura-Berta draft by putting in his karting record? it would be great if you could help! In return, I'll write in your Kevin Foster draft. Thanks! Certified Formula Neek (talk) 14:38, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On it! I made the F4 SEA results table as well, so I'll add those as well! BurningBlaze05 (talk) 15:09, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much Certified Formula Neek (talk) 15:33, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. BurningBlaze05 (talk) 16:03, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But please add a short description. You deleted them for a few of my draft pages and their important, as all pages have a short description BurningBlaze05 (talk) 16:06, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I dunno what it means. I thought it just meant that someone said that it was too short and had to be extended. Certified Formula Neek (talk) 16:57, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll add some citations and more info on the Veselaho draft later this week when I find the time! Certified Formula Neek (talk) 21:10, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think the page might be ready Certified Formula Neek (talk) 17:03, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:2022 Porsche Carrera Cup France[edit]

Hello, BurningBlaze05. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2022 Porsche Carrera Cup France, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:07, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2022 Porsche Carrera Cup France[edit]

Hello, BurningBlaze05. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2022 Porsche Carrera Cup France".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:51, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New drafts[edit]

Hey! I made three new drafts: Josh Irfan, Arthur Dorison and Seb Murray, I was wondering if you could add their full season results as you usually do that would be great! I’ve not been online recently because I’ve had a problem but that’s been fixed now! Certified Formula Neek (talk) 09:15, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And also Alex Ninovic now ;) Certified Formula Neek (talk) 10:52, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll get on it in the afternoon. :) BurningBlaze05 (talk) 13:20, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, that'a great! Certified Formula Neek (talk) 13:20, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As you can see I've had a busy day in terms of editing Certified Formula Neek (talk) 13:21, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]