User talk:Borndistinction

ยินดีต้อนรับสู่วิกิพีเดีย[edit]

สวัสดีครับ ยินดีต้อนรับสู่วิกิพีเดีย จากที่ลองสังเกตเห็นว่าคุณอาจเริ่มต้นเขียนวิกิพีเดีย ซึ่งอย่างน้อยควรจะเข้าใจกับ (1) รูปแบบการเขียน และ (2) นโยบายการเขียน เพื่อป้องกันปัญหาที่คุณอาจกำลังสับสนได้ ไม่ว่า

ทำไมเขียนแล้วถึงโดนลบ และย้อนกลับ
ทำไมโหลดภาพแล้วโดนแจ้งลบ
ทำไมโดนเตือน ไม่เข้าใจว่าทำอะไรผิด

เพราะเท่าที่สังเกตดู คุณสามารถใช้คำสั่งในการเขียนได้ดี แต่ยังไม่เข้าใจนโยบายของวิกิพีเดียหลายอย่าง ไม่ว่าการเขียนที่ไม่เป็นกลาง ลิขสิทธิ์ หรือชื่อบทความ ซึ่งการทั้งหมดของคุณสุดท้ายก็จะโดนลบออกไปจากระบบอยู่ดี แนะนำอย่างยิ่งให้คุณศึกษา

หรืออาจลองแวะมาที่ วิกิพีเดียภาษาไทยเรียนรู้นโยบายขั้นพื้นฐานที่ควรรู้ก่อนเริ่มต้นวิกิพีเดีย และถามคำถามรวมถึง เรียนรู้การใช้งานวิกิพีเดียเบื้องต้น ยินดีต้อนรับและพร้อมให้ความช่วยเหลือในวิกิพีเดียครับ --Manop - TH (talk) 18:19, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Editions on WIKIPEDIA

TAT has not started editing any article on WIKIPEDIA as yet whereas the articles about 3 provinces in Thailand, Pathumthani, Songkhla and Petchabun, are not edited by TAT.

Editions with the username borndistinction is just try to find out whether how it works but has not touched any content at all.--Borndistinction (talk) 08:38, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop[edit]

Please stop moving articles without consensus at Wikipedia:WikiProject Thailand or any of the talk pages of the articles being moved. Moving an article from Nan, Thailand to Nan city (with lowercase "c") is highly improper. Badagnani (talk) 11:42, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop moving articles without consensus at Wikipedia:WikiProject Thailand or any of the talk pages of the articles being moved. Moving an article from Nan, Thailand to Nan city (with lowercase "c") is highly improper. Badagnani (talk) 03:43, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was trying to get the Nan city back to Nan, Thailand or shall i move Nan city to Nan City and then redirect it from Nan, Thailand. Is that what you mean?--Borndistinction (talk) 03:49, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

additions to province articles[edit]

Thank you for your additions to Thai province articles. However, your additions are problematic because they look like a travel guide. A general overview of a province should not contain a listing of every place that tourists like to go in that province. (For an example of an article I recently wrote about a province in Cambodia that I think is a good model, see Ratanakiri Province.) It might be better if you split up these lists to the pages of the districts in which the sights are located (so then it is at least easier to incorporate them into more local articles), or if you created new pages for sights that are notable. Or you could create a section like "Culture in ____" and place the wats there. Mangostar (talk) 08:11, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In addition to the above, your contribution to Narathiwat Province‎ was a copyright violation. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material.

You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later."

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question at the "Village pump". You can also leave a message on my talk page. --Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:09, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Born Distinction on behalf of Tourism Authority of Thailand presents all the information about the destinations in Thailand. All the information brought on to the WIKIPEDIA by User:borndistinction are the true source from Tourism Authority of Thailand i.e. TAT is the owner of the content. So born Distinction has not violated any copyright violation.

Bord Distinction declares that the content contributed are released under the terms of GNU Free Documentation License Version 1.2 and later.--Borndistinction (talk) 08:17, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Moving towns in Thailand to ... town[edit]

Hi please don't move towns to something ...town. The towns should be on the main page without the town tail on it and so as to avoid confusion on the province of the same name. a notice at the top saying

this article is about the town of .... For the article on the province of the same name of which it is part of please see .... Province

There is no reason if this is carried out why any settlements in Thailand should be called ....town as this is the incorrect title for the article ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ ^$1,000,000? 12:18, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding copyright issues[edit]

I don't think you quite understood my post, though I appreciate your apparent efforts in attempting to comply. You posted a release of material to your user page and in other places but that does not comply with the standard. Let me repeat and them I'll parse it a bit; you must:

Make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en at wikimedia dot org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation.

The first bullet point requires that you post the GFDL notice in place of the copyright notice on the external website, not here. Both of these methods show that you are actually associated with the site hosting the content, and have the authority to release the material. Posting here doesn't show this, as accounts are anonymous. I hope this helps.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 01:24, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I understood what you mean... but that website does not belong to us and TAT is the original owner of the content. So right now... every matter is under consideration as well as on process too.--Borndistinction (talk) 04:55, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Borndistinction, Wikipedia needs an email from an official address clarifying this copyright matter. Could someone at the TAT send an email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org explaining...

That Borndistinction is an account authorized to post on behalf of the TAT
That the content posted is the original work of the TAT
That the other sites that host this content are not the author of this content and are hosting it with TAT's permission (or have wrongfully copied TAT's content)

When you have done this, please tell me so that I can have someone restore the articles that were deleted. Mangostar (talk) 22:41, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wikipedia. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- RyRy5 (talk ♠ Review) 07:37, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Amnat Charoen Province constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. —Elipongo (Talk contribs) 07:56, 11 May 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Khon Kaen Province. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Oda Mari (talk) 16:08, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do not misunderstand[edit]

All the deletions were not the intention of vandalism but was to clean up the part uploaded by myself that was considered to look as a travel guide.

So now, I'm going to clean up the unnecessary part of the attractions uploaded by me. I'm doing this so that it would match the concept of wikipedia but not to violate any rules of wikipedia. So please understand my intention.

In case, there is a need to change any of my work... please inform me instead of misunderstanding it. Thank you in advance --Borndistinction (talk) 03:11, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

One article has already been cleaned up while kept only the highlight content of each attraction. The article is Khon Kaen Province... Have a look! --Borndistinction (talk) 10:00, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please add this template to the talk page of articles you add content to[edit]

Please add the template {{TAT}} to the talk pages of the articles you add content to. This will make it clear in the future (for people who were not a part of this discussion) that the entries were added with the consent of the TAT. This will prevent articles from being wrongly deleted in the future.

Thank you... I'll surely do that soon.--Borndistinction (talk) 04:13, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TAT Truth[edit]

Truth to tell, many of your edits would find a better home at Wikitravel than here. For instance, Nong Khai city is a stub that could use your attention! Pawyilee (talk) 12:36, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Medical Tourism in Thailand[edit]

A tag has been placed on Medical Tourism in Thailand, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Medical Tourism in Thailand and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Sfmammamia (talk) 01:00, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you would like a copy of the article to be restored to your userspace so that you may work on addressing the concerns about the page, you may contact one of the admins listed at Category:Wikipedia administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles. Please keep in mind that if you intend to try to rewrite the article, it must be written in a neutral, non-promotional way and based on reliable sources. No original research or copyright violations are permitted. --Sfmammamia (talk) 05:31, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well.. if i still have a back up of my original version... from which i can just rewrite (keeping the policy and rules in mind)... do i still have to get the content back from administrator? --Borndistinction (talk) 10:21, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Golf in Thailand[edit]

It's less promotional, so I will remove that tag. However, it still needs more references, particularly for the assertion that some of the courses are "outstanding". And some of the writing needs to be more encyclopedic in tone, for example: "The Thai people are pretty laid-back and don’t complain a lot even if they lose" and "The Thais think it’s funny when they see foreign visitors mistakingly doing this". ... discospinster _talk 14:06, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK sure... i'll adjust that soon... anyways.. Thank you--Borndistinction (talk) 04:39, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've provided all the necessary citations for the article and adjusted more to be encyclpedic tone...please have a look. If there is any point missed out.. please let me know.. i'll do that too. Thanks--Borndistinction (talk) 07:13, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's much better. I've made a few changes to the wording and took out the "Etiquette" section since it was all unsourced. ... discospinster _talk 23:58, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Bangkok[edit]

Hi Borndistinction, I undid your edit because although I'm sure you put a lot of effort into it, it appears to be unsourced. If you can find sources for it then that would be great, thanks. Deamon138 (talk) 16:17, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Retirement in Thailand[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Retirement in Thailand, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Retirement in Thailand. Thank you. Paul_012 ^(talk) 19:14, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 14[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Medical tourism in Thailand, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Chonburi and Phuket (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 28[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Medical tourism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Chonburi and Phuket

Tourism in Thailand (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Chonburi and Phuket

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:58, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bangkok Cultural & Historical Venue for Business Meeting may have broken the syntax by modifying 5 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:16, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Thailand Convention and Exhibition Bureau may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* Tourism Council of Thailand (TCT

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:51, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bangkok Cultural & Historical Venue for Business Meeting[edit]

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Bangkok Cultural & Historical Venue for Business Meeting, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mean as custard (talk) 15:26, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bangkok Cultural & Historical Venue for Business Meeting[edit]

The article Bangkok Cultural & Historical Venue for Business Meeting has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not a directory of venues or services.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cindy(talk) 08:59, 22 October 2013 (UTC) Cindy(talk) 08:59, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thailand as Historical and cultural business portal (November 5)[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Thailand as Historical and cultural business portal.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Jprg1966 ^(talk) 17:01, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Borndistinction, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

I see that you have removed the "AFC declined" tag from your article draft at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Thailand as Historical and cultural business portal. I have reviewed the draft, and I have to confirm the previous decision. The article reads like a tourism advertisement; Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. Additionally, the article Thailand already exists, as well as subpages like Culture of Thailand and Architecture of Thailand. (Unless you intend to improve the article draft, I will probably soon delete it under the speedy deletion criteria.) - Mike Rosoft (talk) 06:42, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Spa in Thailand for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Spa in Thailand is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spa in Thailand until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Stalwart111 10:13, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Golf in Thailand[edit]

The article Golf in Thailand has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NOTFORPROMOTION. (Interesting side note about the equivalent Wikivoyage page, voy:Golf in Thailand: The community voted not to keep the page. They condensed it into a few paragraphs and merged it into another article.)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Unforgettableid (talk) 04:50, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Diving in Thailand[edit]

The article Diving in Thailand has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Like Spa in Thailand, this promotional article probably fails WP:NOT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Unforgettableid (talk) 05:00, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Thai herbal compress massage for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thai herbal compress massage is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thai herbal compress massage until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Brainy J ~✿~ (talk) 18:07, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Golf in Thailand for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Golf in Thailand is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Golf in Thailand until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Unforgettableid (talk) 02:11, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm Unforgettableid. I wanted to let you know that I tagged one or more of your recent contributions because it appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Many of your edits have been problematic. Sample diff here. —Unforgettableid (talk) 05:52, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Borndistinction. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. —Unforgettableid (talk) 15:38, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Thailand as Historical and cultural business portal concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Thailand as Historical and cultural business portal, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Thailand as Historical and cultural business portal[edit]

Hello Borndistinction. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Thailand as Historical and cultural business portal".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Thailand as Historical and cultural business portal}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 20:11, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm Takeaway. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Mae Hong Son Province have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. - Takeaway (talk) 12:29, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Pattaya. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. - Takeaway (talk) 10:30, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Mae Hong Son Province. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - Takeaway (talk) 10:33, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Phra Nakhon Si Ayutthaya Province. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. - Takeaway (talk) 10:36, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Borndistinction. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alexf^(talk) 15:53, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]