User talk:BonsaiViking

Welcome!

Hello, BonsaiViking, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Hyacinth 04:44, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The neutrality of Ali Saleh Kahlah al-Marri[edit]

You questioned the neutrality of the article on Ali Saleh Kahlah al-Marri. But you didn't start the discussion on the talk page about its neutrality. How are other wikipedian to be able to try to reach a compromise with you on the portions you think are not neutral if you don't say what you think they are? -- Geo Swan 14:52, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It has been nine months since I asked you explain what you thought was biased about this article. You have left us guessing as to whether you think it is biased in favor of Al-Marri, or biased against him. Could you please offer an explanation the next time you log in? Or alternatively, remove the tag? Thanks. -- Geo Swan 23:14, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Usage of evangelical[edit]

I've continued the discussion on the talk pages of both What would Jesus do? and Pascal's Wager. Samw 03:08, 22 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Stub sorting[edit]

[1]: Why is "The Immortal" a book stub, given that it is a short story? -- Jmabel | Talk 21:50, 29 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Great minds think alike-User:Rayc[edit]

Hey, I see you found the hive mind which is wikipeida, BV. Wonder if they have an article on multiverse high yet? I see that you have been doing some of the stub sorting and disamb link repair, just like me. I'm now over in the observatoy stub creation department. If you need help on anything, just ask, i've been here since july. -Russ

Hey, want to help with the Wikiproject:Nebraska BV?---Rayc 00:32, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Jesus[edit]

Check out the Jesus article and edit it to keep it focused on Jesus and a biographical account of Him. Watch the Jesus page to keep it focused on Him. Thank you. Scifiintel 21:42, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Kem[edit]

Hello I'm another user who saw you leave a note about the surname Kem on Pisethkem's talk page. I must say that the surname Kem is indeed displayed there properly in Khmer... but it's normal if you only see question marks. (Do you see question marks all over the place at Khmer numerals too?) I don't know why that can happen though. -- KittySaturn 10:48, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Come and vote your mind[edit]

Dear Christian friend,

I saw you on the list of Christian Wikipedians and wanted to let you know about something. The other day, someone nominated 12 Christian biography entries for deletion! They include a Christian university list of people (not unlike 68 other lists like it)[2], presidents of universities, and authors of many books.

Since that time, people have been voting. Please take this message as a call to vote; not a call to vote a certain way. I respect you and your ability to come, read the entry, and make a wise decision. In other words, I’m not vote stacking or campaigning; simply letting you know something that you’d probably like to know.

By the way, my friend recently started an organization called Wiki4Christ. If you’d like to join a network of Christians with a purpose on Wikipedia, please see the site!

Below are some of the links that need attention. Thanks for your consideration.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_Louisiana_Baptist_University_people_%28second_nomination%29

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Neal_Weaver

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jimmy_DeYoung

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/James_Combs

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Robert_Morey

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Daniel_Dorim_Kim

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/J._Otis_Ledbetter

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ron_Moseley

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mike_Randall

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Charles_Pack

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mal_Couch

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Thomas_Ice

God bless you, Wiggins2 06:44, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

MS image[edit]

Thank you for noticing! I'm aware - the text does cover the charted courses, but obviously the bolded headings don't match one for one. We've discussed changing the headings, but it seems that things are best left alone at this point. InvictaHOG 03:31, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Wikiethics[edit]

Hi,

We started a proposal Wikipedia:Wikiethics to state the existing policies coherently and make suggestions on improving the editorial standards in Wiki. I thought you might be interested in contributing to that proposal.

Unfortunately, a pro-porn and pro-offense lobby is trying to make this proposal a failure. They unilaterally started an approval poll although almost no one including me believe that it is time for a vote, simply because the policy is not ready. It is not even written completely.

Editors who thinks that the policy needs to be improved rather than killed by an unfair poll at the beginning of the proposal, started another poll ('Do we really need a poll at this stage?') at the same time. The poll is vandalized for a while but it is stable now. A NO vote on this ('Do we really need a poll now?') poll will strengthen the position of the editors who are willing to improve the ethics policy further.

If you have concerns about the ethics and editorial standards in Wiki, please visit the page Wikipedia:Wikiethics with your suggestions on the policy. We have two subpages: Arguments and Sections. You might want to consider reviewing these pages as well...

Thanks in advance. Resid Gulerdem 00:11, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would love your help.[edit]

Hi,

I know you are interested in christianity, and I recently started a new wiki over at wikicities which is on the subject of christianity. Christian Knowledge Base is the site.

The goal is to have a knowledgebase on christianity from a distinctly "C(hristian)POV" rather than the NPOV. It is not meant to be a mere Christian Encyclopedia, but to foster a real sense of community. I'd like to include things like current events, news, stories, and anything that would add to both an understanding of Christianity, but also its enjoyment. I'm looking for help to build a resource that could really enrich the lives of Christians.

I know you are busy but I am actively seeking new sysops/admins to help me build this site up, and I would be positively thrilled if you could contribute in any capacity whatsoever. nsandwich 05:52, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]