User talk:Blueshirts

This user may have left Wikipedia. Blueshirts has not edited Wikipedia since 29 June 2013. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Talk page archive

Chinese military history task force (part 2 since you archived your talk)[edit]

Hey there! The Chinese military history task force has been created! Please help us expand Wikipedia's coverage of the military history of China. Feel free to list you name here, and invite your friends too! ;) -- Миборовский ^{U|T|C|M|E|Chugoku Banzai!} 01:22, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the nice comment. I like this name a lot. You have a nice name too. Blue shirts, I am assuming refers to the secret police group under the Kuomintang ROC government which was controlled by Chiang Ching-kuo. -Chiang Kai-shek

Edit summaries[edit]

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thanks, and happy editing.

--digital_m e_{(Talk)(Contribs)} 23:37, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies. I misinterpreted your intentions. I removed my comment. Scienceman123 23:47, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject Newsletter - Issue III - May 2006[edit]

The May 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —ERcheck @ 11:48, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Shanghai1937IJA armored cars.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Shanghai1937IJA armored cars.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:07, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Shanghai1937city_bombed_out.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Shanghai1937city_bombed_out.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:36, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WarWiki[edit]

(Sorry if this seems like spamming.) Hey, if you like Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history then you might like war.wikia.com where we need people (we have only 16 users) to write anything about war--fictional (i.e. Star Wars, LOTR) or real (i.e. WWII, American Civil War). Thank you! the_ed1 7 13:01, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

re: map[edit]

Hi there. I use Photoshop, which is quite an investment =| I haven't used it myself, but the free GIMP has always seemed to be the most popular alternative. Hope that helps, --Loopy ^e 06:51, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request help[edit]

hi BlueShirts, You share pretty much the same values as I do when talking about the Repbublic of China. Therefore, I hope you will agree and help me in the ongoing dispute about naming the ROC portal, ROC, not "Taiwan." You can see the links on my talk page, which lead to other mediation/talk pages. Please respond. Thank you. -Chiang Kai-shek 00:34, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

When I think about a portal, I think its usually named by country and it contains information and links to other related articles. How is it geographic? They claim to want to put information about Taiwan exclusively, but that can be done under the name Portal:Republic of China. After all, Taiwan makes up most of the free territory of the ROC. We don't have to include Mongolia, Mainland China, etc. Some brief info can be given about the Chinese Civil War and the ROC/PRC. I think they are promoting a pan-green political agenda with regards to naming, color, etc. -Chiang Kai-shek 00:49, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Portals[edit]

Hi BlueShirts, I noticed when looking at Chiang Kai-shek's talk page that you were interested in the idea of a ROC portal, but didn't really know a lot about portals. If you are interested in portals (regardless of the out of Taiwan/ROC portal debate) you can find out everything you need here. I hope that you find this useful. Yours, Th e Halo (talk) 01:12, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Taiwan "state" vs "country"[edit]

Hi, please join the discussion on Talk:Taiwan regarding what term we should use. Simply changing it back and forth will not get us anywhere. Ideogram 02:31, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. Aish Warya was apparently a sockpuppet account created for vandalism. Ideogram 06:26, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is no discussion on whether Taiwan is a state or a country. It is a province of the Republic of China. (province=state). -Chiang Kai-shek 00:48, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Taiwan is a country, not a province. Understand your facts first. Had Taiwan been a province, it would not be able to elect its own president. Prowikipedians (talk) 15:59, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WRONG, prowikipedians, official name of taiwan is REPUBLIC OF CHINA.ㄏㄨㄤㄉㄧ (talk) 23:27, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Taiwan[edit]

Hi BlueShirts,

Finally, another person who understands the intension of the portal being about the island of Taiwan as a geographic entry. I used to support Portal:Republic of China because the China portal is Portal:Republic of China so I thought it should've been a "nation/state" portal as well. But after I read the reason for the portal name (given by User:Captain0) I understood that it's geographic, so it covers a wide scope of topics concerning Taiwan island. Whereas an ROC portal limits the scope of topics down to ROC on Taiwan (Therefore, cannot mention colonial history by Dutch, Japan, Ming, Qing) or about aborigines because it raises "anti-ROC" or "pro-independence" problems. But the fact is these topics widen our understanding about the history of Taiwan.

Your suggestion about making the Portal:Republic of China into a portal about the politics and history of the ROC is a good idea, so long as it doesn't claim to be Taiwan but "China (inc. Taiwan)" since 1911 with the map of China (mainland territories shaded; ROC jurisdiction highlighted). That would be more ROC-centric and can mention a wide range of topics such as Chinese Civil War, retrocession of Taiwan to ROC from Japan, military campaigns, etc. Then it can be linked to Portal:Taiwan and the Taiwan portal can be linked to "Republic of China" and "People's Republic of China" as the history. Then I suggest we ask that Portal:China be ressurected as being about China (geography) which will link to both PRC and ROC portals (politics) that should be the best compromise to the portal name dispute. A Portal China can mention history about the dynasties, the question about Tibet, Xinjiang, Mongolia, etc because that is the history of China, not the history of PRC. — Nrtm81 09:42, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello BlueShirts. This is just a note to inform say that there is a mediation process currently ongoing at Portal talk:Taiwan which you might be interested in as you have commented on this issue before. However, do not feel pressured to comment here as the mediation process is between Nrtm81 and Chiang Kai-shek. If you don't want to get involved in the issue, you don't have to. On the flip side of that, if you feel that you have something helpful to add, please do! We would aprichiate any comment that you have on the matter, and would like it if you could help us resolve the issue.

Yours, Th e Halo (talk) 11:46, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, I thought so too. It's just too bad that the mediation broke down and has gone to ArbCom. Still, thank you very much for your comments all the same. Th e Halo (talk) 19:20, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the arbitration page for further information on my view. I'm happy to have a Taiwan exclusive portal, but it just can't be under the name "Taiwan" because it is way too confusing and raises way too many eyebrows. I'm not from Mainland China and I am not a Communist Chinese conspirator. I am a supporter of the Republic of China and I love Taiwan as well. Both can be accomplished at the same time. -Chiang Kai-shek 00:50, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, I'm actually from Taiwan, and I'm not a waishengren. I'm a benshengren. I'm born in Taiwan and proud of it. But I love both the Republic of China and Taiwan. I think the status quo is the way too go personally. Frankly, I'm not happy with the Mainlander Chinese and the Communist Party of China. -Chiang Kai-shek 01:43, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can you help convince Chiang Kai-shek to agree to "Portal:Taiwan (island)"? It seems like such a small thing, they are now fighting over two characters! Ideogram 08:25, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Maps[edit]

Do you mean myself personally? It's not too sophisticated; I just use GIMP and draw in the arrows by combining a path trace with pencilled-in arrowheads.

If you mean what a good map maker would use, you'd probably have to ask someone who actually knows how to draw! ;-) Kirill Lokshin 21:11, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dunno; how wide are you making them? I used the "stroke path" command with a width of 3px and managed to get halfway decent results. Kirill Lokshin 05:10, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not really sure. I do know that, for almost all maps, redrawing it by hand avoids any sort of copyright issues; but I'm not sure how tracing would affect it. I would assume that, if the tracing was close enough to the original, it would count as "reproduction" and become a derivative work of the original map, copyright-wise; but it's probably a question you should ask on Wikipedia:Copyrights or some similar page if you want a more certain answer. Kirill Lokshin 05:27, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I know, yes; the backgrounds are public domain images (really old maps are great for this sort of thing) and the lines are drawn in by hand (for obviousl reasons—I couldn't trace any existing maps onto the background images I had). I don't know if actually tracing the lines from somewhere would change the situation or not, though. Kirill Lokshin 05:32, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Free Area of the Republic of China[edit]

Hey BlueShirts, if you don't mind, can you create a portal theme for the Portal:Free Area of the Republic of China. I have decided that it would be better to have that portal than the Portal:Taiwan. The Free Area is a politically neutral term and it covers all of the territory in the current ROC's jurisdiction. If you could contribute, please do so. Also, we should work on Portal:Republic of China as well. -Chiang Kai-shek 01:19, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It would be nice to have Portal:ROC cover everything about the ROC from Mainland and all the history of Taiwan. However, that would create problems, because people like Nrtm81 don't agree. They want Portal:Taiwan. So then we should use Portal:ROC for all history of ROC from Mainland to Taiwan, but for Taiwan history specifically, we should use Portal:Free Area of the Republic of China. -Chiang Kai-shek 02:28, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:ROC is supposed to be a separate new portal only about the ROC from its time on the Mainland and to present. On the other hand, Portal:Free Area of the Republic of China is supposed to be the replacement for Portal:Taiwan. -Chiang Kai-shek 11:59, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject Newsletter - Issue IV - June 2006[edit]

The June 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. — ERcheck (talk) @ 02:28, 30 June 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Shanghai1937IJA urban.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Shanghai1937IJA urban.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:08, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject Newsletter - Issue V - July 2006[edit]

The July 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot.

Battle of Wuhan[edit]

I just extensively expanded the Battle of Wuhan article.. Please check it out :)!

--AQu01rius 17:32, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history Coordinator Elections![edit]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are looking to elect seven coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by August 11!

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot - 18:22, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Shanghai1937 images[edit]

Hi, BlueShirts. I've noticed that these pictures you uploaded have a tag which is probably fair as to copyright, but absolutely no source information. Can you please list the sources ASAP so as to ensure there aren't any fair usage problems? Thanks, John Smith's 22:20, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blue, if you don't give me some sort of response I'll have to tag them. I know that you are editing wikipedia - what's the problem? John Smith's 18:25, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This doesn't have anything to do with the Nanjing issue. It's to do with improperly sourced/evidenced pictures. You can't just say "they are fair use", you need to specify the source. Please go through the pictures and actually list the photobooks you got them from - author, title, page number, etc. Then they'll be fine.

Pictures get deleted all the time because they don't have proper copyright and source info. That is wikipedia policy. John Smith's 11:54, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blue, why do you keep ignoring me/refusing to state the specific sources for these pictures? Can't you even state you will make it a priority to list appropriate sources? Is it too much to ask from you? John Smith's 11:59, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator election - vote phase![edit]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will select seven coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of eleven candidates. Please vote here by August 26!

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot - 11:21, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What[edit]

I THINK THIS ARTICLE Republic of China NEED MORE AND MORE PICTURES , SEE People's Republic of China ANDSouth Korea ANDJapan ANDSingapore , THESE ARTICLE HAVE A LOT OF PICTURES ,SHOULDN SOMEBODY TO ADD MORE PICTURES FOR IT?

Military history WikiProject Newsletter - Issue VI - August 2006[edit]

The August 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot -- 11:54, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RE:User box[edit]

Of course not. -- Миборо в ский 06:04, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history Newsletter - Issue VII - September 2006[edit]

The September 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by Grafikbot - 18:52, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue VIII - October 2006[edit]

The October 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 21:01, 25 October 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Stegosaurus[edit]

Hi BlueShirts!

I'm planning to send Stegosaurus to Featured Article candidacy. The article failed its first nomination, but user:Casliber and I have been hard at work fixing stuff. As you're listed as a member of Wikipedia: WikiProject Dinosaurs, I figured I'd drop you a line and see if there was anything you thought should be added/removed/cited on the article before it is sent to FAC. We definitely want it to pass! :)

(Feel free to make any edits on the article itself, comment on the talk page, or leave a note on my talk page). Thanks for your time, Firsfron of Ronchester 19:22, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BlueShirts!

I've followed your advice and added the diet section. I don't know why no one thought of that until now, so I'm glad I asked for a few second opinions, such as yours. I am trying to closely follow the earlier dinosaur Featured Articles in terms of layout and information, as you noted. Anyway, thanks again for your helpful suggestions. :) Happy editing, Firsfron of Ronchester 04:53, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue IX - November 2006[edit]

The November 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 22:02, 26 November 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Template:Warlord era[edit]

Hi,

I am currently exploring the idea of splitting this template into four different parts. I feel that it is simply too large in its present state. It takes up the entire screen on my computer. I have created four mockups of my idea, which can be viewed by going to User:Danaman5/Workshop and clicking on the four "Warlord" links. As someone who has edited this template before, I wanted to get your opinion before moving forward. You can leave a message on my user talk page with any comments.

Thanks, --Danaman5 01:59, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Some suggestion page for u to edit[edit]

Sino-Indian_War McMahon_Line Aksai_Chin Arunachal_Pradesh Tawang_District

p/s: The may be u can passed the link to ur frens that interested to edit those article.Sawadeekrap 09:06, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue X - December 2006[edit]

The December 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 22:20, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wang Chien-ming[edit]

Apparently this Yankee guy keeps disputing the fact that Chien-ming was born in Tainan City, Taiwan, Republic of China. He keeps insisting that Taiwan by itself is an independent sovereign nation. That is not true. I keep pointing him to reliable sources such as the ROC government websites and several Wikipedia articles. But he just doesn't bother to read it. He keep saying MLB says just Taiwan. Well of course, it would, since the USA doesn't maintain diplomatic relations with the Republic of China. Well, duh, but he just doesn't get it. Can you help us resolve this dispute? Thank you -Nationalist 08:53, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nationalist (talk · contribs) is posting strawman arguments and outright lies. I've neither said nor implied that Taiwan is a sovereign nation, nor do I really care. I'm asking for a reliable source that says Wang was born in the Republic of China. Every single reliable source I've found says Taiwan. The threshold for inclusion of information into Wikipedia is verifiability - not truth. Please review WP:VERIFY. All I'm asking for is a reliable source that says Wang was born any place other than Taiwan. Nationalist seems unable to comply with this very simple request or unwilling for personal reasons that may include a non NPOV. He/she has done nothing other than to post original research, links to sites that don't even mention Wang, or sources links to other articles on Wikipedia. Again and I'll repeat this so we're clear, as per Wikipedia policy, The threshold for inclusion of information into Wikipedia is verifiability - not truth. I would suggest an RFC with further posts on the article talk page, rather than canvassing and disputes on numerous users talk pages. Yankees76 16:41, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Being Uncivil[edit]

Regarding this edit.[1] calling other Wikipedia editors "fucking dumbasses". Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Yankees76 00:35, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this edit calling others troll: Please stop. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Thank you. Vic226_(chat) 04:40, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XI - January 2007[edit]

The January 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 20:17, 23 January 2007 (UTC) [reply]

This is out of control[edit]

We need to reign in these guys..I am looking for a compromise and solution, but these guys are becoming more radical by the second. For example, for Guantian, Tainan, Jerry made Chen Shui-bian "President of Taiwan" instead of "President of the Republic of China." He also called the Presidential Building Taiwan, instead of ROC Presidential Building. And his fellow supporters are adding to this. What should we do? What is your email? -Nationalist 02:18, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am still looking for a compromise, but no luck. Jerry is out to delete all instances of Republic of China or ROC and to make sure everything says Taiwan Taiwan and Taiwan. I have no problem having Taiwan, ROC or Taiwan, Republic of China. The Taiwan existing there clarifies everything. But why does he have to delete ROC or Republic of China? Clearly, I think he is pushing a POV. Examples are the above edit to Guantian and several others. Several articles were fine before he started vandalizing it. For example for an article the field said Country: Republic of China. he purposely changed it to Taiwan (ROC). But it was already clear that this was Taiwan since underneath that field said Birthplace: Kaoshuing, Taiwan. I would like to seek mediation and opinions, can you refer anyone here and get in contact with Jiang? -Nationalist 00:58, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You guys were bickering and you didn't invite me... =( Jumping cheese ^Cont@ct 17:46, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:MILHIST Coordinator Elections[edit]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are looking to elect seven coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by February 11!

Delivered by grafikbot 10:10, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey![edit]

Thanxs for the message. That a look at Talk:Taiwan and Talk:Republic of China and all the archives for the thousands of comments on naming convention. Basically everyone accused each other of POV and eventually the fights died down, only to be continuously restarted...so there's really no consensus about the naming. However, whenever naming becomes an issue, it's best to appeal to both sides of the political spectrum, such as "Republic of China (Taiwan)" instead of "Republic of China" or "Taiwan". That usually causes the least controversy.
I have a vague memory of coming across an actual naming convention discussion on some official Wikipedia page, but I became active in Wikipedia after it had ended. I can't find it...so sorry. =) Jumping cheese ^Cont@ct 18:27, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

World War 2[edit]

Excuse me but I am having great difficulty understanding your edit to World War 2, even more your summary “no”. Perhaps you should clarify how Chiang Kaishek was leader of the Communist forces in China, all 1.3 million, and why, if so, both sides continued to fight each other during the height of the conflict!

I do not see how Mao Zedong cannot be classified as an important leader in World War 2. The article on the 2nd Sino Japanese War list the Chinese Communists as a separate faction, and this is shown in the “commanders” section for Mao Zedong. Mao Zedong and his fellow communists even considered themselves a separate nation during the war as the Soviet (later People’s) republic of China, and the Kuomintang Republic of China, and not one unified country.

Judging by your site you probably know a lot more Chinese history than me, and if there is a good reason why Mao Zedong cannot be called this, please specify this. Matt. P 17:12, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry, I realised my mistake and it has been rectified.Matt. P 17:26, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military History elections[edit]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting seven coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by February 25!

Delivered by grafikbot 13:37, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Passing by[edit]

Hi, i am HappyApple from Wikiproject Chemistry, i have read to your user's page and it seems when you speak about yourself you claim work in laboratory or doing research. Are you interested in joining our project?, We have many tasks to do, and i feel you can help us in the maintenance =) . By the way i also read to your oppinions about the P.R.C and i agree with you, i dont like the commies also, by the way, are you chinese? I have this impression, well, take care and happy new year.--HappyApple 09:25, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RFC/discussion of article World War II[edit]

Hello, Blueshirts. As a prominent contributor to World War II, you may want to be aware that a request for comments has been filed about it. The RFC can be found by the article's name in this list, and the actual discussion can be found on Talk:World War II, in case you wish to participate. Thank you for your contributions. -- Krellis 01:07, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall[edit]

Thanks for correcting the blurb to the correct term "desinicization". I just BSed the translation. Kelvinc 09:42, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tears of the Black Tiger[edit]

Hi! I've responded to your question on Talk:Tears of the Black Tiger. Have you seen the film? — WiseKwai 14:49, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

People's Republic of China[edit]

Hi. When editing an article under a content dispute/edit war, please do not mark controversial edits minor, and please do leave an edit summary explaining the reason for your edit. Thanks. Xiner (talk, email) 17:32, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XII - February 2007[edit]

The February 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 14:44, 1 March 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Shanghai Battle with a Nanjing Baby[edit]

Hey dude. I re-edited my edit to your edit. Or something. I deleted the Nanjing baby from the Battle of Shanghai article because, well, it is a Nanjing baby, not a Shanghai baby. Unless you've got information saying otherwise, I think it should stay out. I'm not randomly editing stuff for my amusement or to put forward a specific interpretation. You didn't mention in the comments why you put it back in, though. I've started a conversation on the page about it.

--Bakarocket 11:52, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

World War II Mediation Case[edit]

A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/World War II, and indicate whether you agree or refuse to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to Wikipedia:Mediation. There are only seven days for everyone to agree, so please check as soon as possible. —Krellis (Talk) 21:20, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What do you think? Haber 13:16, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. Haber 23:12, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

psst - Taiwanese American[edit]

Hey, from my "conversations" with Certified.Gangsta in the past, I gathered that he's one quarter Taiwanese, apparently. He doesn't think there are Chinese people in Taiwan. --Sumple (Talk) 08:15, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A bit from column A, and a bit from column B? I think it's a combination of (1) a very warped understanding of Taiwan and (perhaps) his own identity, and (2) a steadfast refusal to look at evidence. --Sumple (Talk) 03:44, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Second Sino-Japanese War page[edit]

Chinese Communists allowed the Nationalist forces to do the majority of the fighting against Japan, while conducting guerilla warfare against the Japanese forces. The CCP sought to avoid direct conflicts with the Japanese Army in order to emerge from the war stronger than the Nationalist forces, so in the inevitable struggle for dominance, the CCP would be the victor.

As I mentioned in the discussion page of the article itself, the sentences do not sound neutral. It would be more appropriate to say something like "The CCP avoided frontal confrontations with the Japanese Imperial Army while conducting guerilla warfare, in order to spread communist influences and build bases of operations." Hanfresco 12:26, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Certified.Gangsta RfC[edit]

Hey, you probably already know, but there is an RfC on User:Certified.Gangsta at Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Certified.Gangsta. I know that you have been involved in and attempted to resolve this dispute, so you might want to consider certifying the RfC so that it is not deleted again. Note that I am not advocating for any particular position. I just want to see this dispute move into the formal resolution processes so that it can be resolved with the least amount of bloodshed possible. The present back and forth on numerous talk pages and the Admin noticeboard is helping no one. --Danaman5 21:27, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The RfC is now approved. You may wish to make a statement on the matter or add evidence.--Danaman5 04:19, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That is incorrect, the RfC is not yet approved. In order for it to meet approval, please point out any attempts on your parts to resolve the dispute (in diff format). If such diffs are already listed, please point these out. Thanks in advance. El_C 21:25, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It means diffs featuring yourself speaking to the user in question about the dispute. El_C 21:51, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject China#Naming conventions[edit]

Hi please participate in the discussion. --Ideogram 01:26, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Saying hi[edit]

Yes, been quite busy with, among other things, preparing for college and playing video games. :P Should hopefully have more time after May. -- 我♥中國 19:27, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Needing Help With Photo Copywright[edit]

Hi once more, I have a question about a recently uploaded photo that I want to use for Liuhe Pagoda of China. The article lacked any picture, and it really needs one, considering that it is one of the greatest Song Dynasty (or any) Chinese pagoda standing today.

The image is found at this link here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Liuhe_Pagoda.jpg

If you would be so kind, I'd like to have you or somebody else verify the copywright license (it's some random American guy's vacation blog pic). In the meantime, I have given it the GFDL presumed tag, but if I do not verify the copywright stuff, it will be deleted in 7 days!

Thanks for your help, --PericlesofAthens 06:18, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ranks of the People's Liberation Army[edit]

Hi. There's a dispute currently happening on this page. A user added in rank information about two supposed older ranks, the PLA's Marshall and Grand Marshal equivalents. An admin is convinced that the person adding is a sockpuppet and had him banned and reverted. From seeing the edits, and from seeing a source the admin provided, the edits seem legitimate, but I'm not very familiar with the PLA, myself. Since you're in the History wikiproject, you might know a bit more about it and be in a position to comment and hopefully help settle the dispute. --Yuje 11:59, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XIII - March 2007[edit]

The March 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 18:36, 30 March 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#Certified.Gangsta-Ideogram[edit]

Hello,

A request for arbitration has been filed regarding the conduct of Certified.Gangsta.

Can I trouble you to write a statement at Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#Certified.Gangsta-Ideogram recounting your interactions with him and your impressions of his conduct as an editor?

Thanks.

LionheartX 16:35, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just saw your statement at Requests for Arbitration [2] , and it looks to me like your statement isn't clear what editor you're talking about: you use he/him/his without specifying whom you mean (note that the case is called "Certified.Gangsta-Ideogram", so it could refer to either one). You might want to clarify (I'm not an arbitrator or clerk, so this isn't official, by any means). Heimstern Läufer 00:33, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note: When you want to write an rebuttal to someone's comment on RfAr, you must do it in your own section. I took the liberty of moving what you wrote back into your comment section. See here. If there's any questions, please ask me here or on my talk page. Thanks. - Penwhale | ^{Blast him / Follow his steps} 17:43, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Taiwanese History Sources[edit]

Hey, I appreciate your enthusiastic approach, but you should really be providing sources for such major edits.Maowang 05:07, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Certified.Gangsta-Ideogram[edit]

Hello,

An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Certified.Gangsta-Ideogram. Please add any evidence you may wish the arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Certified.Gangsta-Ideogram/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Certified.Gangsta-Ideogram/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, David Mestel^(Talk) 11:26, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dinosaur UBX[edit]

Hi Blueshirts,

Saw that you have a UBX about dinosaurs and thought that this might be of interest to you:

This user happily missed
the Cretaceous–Tertiary extinction event.

Take care,

Larry

--Lmcelhiney 13:41, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Canvassing[edit]

Canvassing is a Wikipedia guideline, not a policy. Nevermind Durova. You're allowed to post notices on people's talk pages as long as it's not mass spamming, you don't suggest which way to vote, and your audience sample is considered neutral. Cheers, ~ UBeR 18:42, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ugly red links[edit]

Hi Blueshirts,

I'm still curious how you chose your username... Hey, if you're gonna put a link to May Chin on the Taiwanese aborigines page, why don't you write an article about her? One source I know of is here:

Simon, Scott (2006, Jan 4). "Formosa's First Nations and the Japanese: from Colonial Rule to Postcolonial Resistance". Japan Focus. Accessed 3/16/2007.

... you should know that the "notable people" section is a bit of a wart on the article at the moment, because it is in list format, and because it is so short. Eventually it will either get merged into some other section, re-written into paragraph form, or simply deleted...

Later! --Ling.Nut 19:36, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XIV (April 2007)[edit]

The April 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 13:34, 6 May 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Blueshirts[edit]

Here's some infor regarding why some people may find "Blueshirts" offensive or suggestive of a political agenda and a particular POV:

Johnathan D. Spence, the highly regarded China expert from Yale, characterizes the Blueshirts in his undergraduate staple, The Search for Modern China, as:

...Spearheaded by the earliest graduating classes of Whampoa cadets, to steel the political and military leadership of China for the long struggles ahead. Pledging themselves to lives of ascetic rigor, rejecting gambling, whoring or excessive consumption of food and drink, members of the group wore shirts made of coarse blue cotton, which led to their being informally named, 'Blueshirts'...Encouraged by Chiang...One theorist for the 'Blueshirts' spoke openly for their need to be like a knife, an instrument that could kill in combat or harmlessly cut vegetables...the same theorist found models for China to emulate in three societies: Stalin's Soviet Union, Hitler's Germany and Mussolini's Italy. In all three cases, he claimed, the purpose behind the slogans of national or state socialism was similar to Sun Yat Sen's Three Principles of the People. He saw democracy as a sham that could only damage a country like China, with poverty and illiterate masses. ....With a fierce loyalty to the cult of Chiang as leader, with a strong base in the administrative, military and party machinery, and with its members granted special roles in the anti-Communist campaign, the Blueshirts nucleus developed into a disciplined military and secret-police apparatus....The Blueshirt Dai Li, a Zhejiang-born Whampoa graduate, became head of Chiang Kai-sheck's Special Service Section....Initially supervising 145 operatives, by 1935 he had 1700. Dai Li was believed to have directed a number of political assasinations of those opposed to Chiang, including the head of the Chinese League for the Protection of Civil Rights (in 1933) and editor of Shanghai's leading newspaper (in 1934) (It continues with descriptions of how Blue Shirts were used to infiltrate labor groups and spy on citizens). Spence, The Search for Modern China(pp.357-358).

furthermore

In March 1940 Wang Jingwei, Sun Yat Sen's former lieutenant and one time second-in-command to Chiang Kai-sheck, at last lent his prestige to the central China puppet regime-to the delight of the Japanese- by accepting the post of its ranking official. Wang's regime was afforded diplomatic recognition by the Japanese...Despite concentrated attempts by Guomintang secret agentsunder Dai Li to assasinate prominent Chinese collaborators, Wang's regime survived....

(Spence, p.439)

Barbara Tuchman in, Stilwell and the American Experience in China, refers to the Blueshirts as, "The Kuomintang's stormtroopers". (Tuchman, p.321)

The least flatteriing portrait is painted by Brian Crozier in, The Man Who Lost China (1976),(Crozier;pp.10-11)

Theodore White's Chapter in, Thunder Out Of China, "Chiang Kai-sheck-The People's Choice" does not get into the Blue Shirts per se, but he does mention the New Life ideology.

For the Sterling Seagrave treatment, you can look at pp.292-294 in The Soong Dynasty.

If these characterizations are way off... they seem to be the predominant opinion of scholars and China Studies experts, so you can't get too upset if people disagree with you. Maowang 01:41, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On your long comment, all I have to say is give me a break, you're beating a dead horse. Every book on Chinese history that labels the blue shirts as "fascists" based this conclusion solely on Lloyd Eastman's article in China Quarterly. The same thing is carried over to Eastman's book Abortive Revolution. I've read many books and when you check the notes section, almost all of them cite the above work by Eastman as reference. Thus, it makes absolutely no difference at all how many references you can drum up with, because all of them are derived from the same work. After some heated discussion with Maria Chang in the China Quarterly, and particularly after the revelation and exposure of the group by former members in the 1980s, Eastman has profoundly changed his views, and this is reflected in an article published in the journal Republican China, now "Comtemporary China" I believe. Research in these areas is always changing, please. Blueshirts 03:40, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to be trying to blame Eastman for all the research on the Blueshirts. I'm sure Mr. Eastman would be flattered that he could have so much influence and the singular authority. I haven't seen his name in any of the notes. I did see a report from a magazine article from 1936. I also see a book here called "Fascism in China 1925-1938: A Documentary Study, by Michael Lestz and Cheng Pei-kai pp. 311-314. This does not seem to rely on Eastman for any "documentary evidence".

I'm trying to think of where I saw that connection...maybe in Formosa Betrayed or something

Anyway... whether right or wrong, many people are reading the version I provided and thus may view your tag as "loaded". Maowang 03:56, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lloyd Eastman, in the 1991 book, The Nationalist Era in China, on page 28, clearly calls them fascist and influenced by the ideologies of Hitler, Mussolini etal.Maowang 04:12, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That is so much misinformation. The passage from Barbara Tuchman's book on Stilwell says the organization was founded in 1932, when in reality it was 1931 before the invasion of Manchuria. It also says they were Chiang's "storm troopers", when the influence of fascism was minimal. The entire passage also had only one passing mention on the oganization, "...leaders of group which founded the Blue Shirts, the Kuomintang's storm troopers". And the sentence itself was not referenced and carried no citation at all. And you're using this weak reference as a source to call them fascists? As for the information from Crozier's The Man Who Lost China, it's a popular history book with very little research value. Crozier is a journalist, not a historian. This is from the review of this book on Pacific Affairs (v. 51 no. 1) by James Sheridan "...the sparsity of sources shows up not only in obvious errors in Chiang's main public activities, but also in gross over-simplifications and errors in his treatment of the political context". The only good thing about this book is that it was the first English biography about Chiang's entire life, but carries too many mistakes and too little analysis for the specialist, especially in an area as complicated as the blue shirts. The same thing can be said for "Soong Dynasty" and this popular history books, which are good the the general readership, but probably would get a graduate student marked for his use in his term paper. And I'm surprised that Eastman was not mentioned as he was the head guy in creating this notion in western scholarship, with his seminal article in the China Quarterly in 1972, as most previous sources that called the blue shirts fascists were Japanese intelligence propaganda aiming to undermine Chinag's negotiations during the pre-war period. And the 1991 book by Eastman was not a new book, it was a collection of essential chapters from the Cambridge History of China. It does not reflect any changes in his views due to his discussions with various historians and former members of the group. Seriously, I hope you don't make this kind out-of-context edits and quote mining on any of the articles you make on wikipedia, and maybe find better specialist sources than general history books that you find in barnes-and-nobles. Blueshirts 04:36, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just thought I would ask... so I was looking at an old Chinese history book from 1964, Twentieth Century China, by Edmund Clubb. On page 213 he describes the Blue Shirts as "Nanking's fascist-type body". Since Clubb predates Eastman's article by eight years, should we blame his work for the bad info?;-)Maowang 08:05, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Frederick Wakeman's 2003 book,Spymaster:Daili and the Chinese Secret Service, on pages 101-102 (fully aware of the Eastman debate), describes the Blue Shirts as "proto-fascist", and provides notes on the similarities and differences between the Blue Shirts and the European fascist organizations. Not the kind of people a person would seemingly want to identify with today. Maowang 05:51, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

like i said, the earliest sources to call them fascists were from pre-war Japanese intelligence, and from the archives of the international police in the shanghai concessions. Eastman was not the first one to label them fascists, but he was the main force behind this whole debate in western scholarship, and it was in direct response to his "denigration" of the organization that former members came into the limelight and published memoirs and articles in journals like "chuan chi wen shuei" in Taiwan. Wakeman goes into more length in Reapprasing Republican China and invents this term "confucian fascism", which he calls "iconically amibiguous". Their "ism" was the Three Principles of the People, and they did not need a foreign "ism" to reinvigorate China. Basically they were a nativist group, where anti-foreignism and ethnic revival were of utmost importance, not necessarily "fascism". And can you please tell me where you found that Chiang Ching-kuo was the leader of the blue shirts, thanks, as this is very interesting. Blueshirts 17:27, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Konoe[edit]

Hi, I notice (unfortunaltely after removing him...) you brought back Fumimaro Konoe as "commander" in second sino-japanese war arguing he sould be there as political leader . I do not really object to that, for if you think the Infobox should refer to political leaders, I suggest we also add Hirohito, who was not only supreme commander of Army and Navy but also a major political leader. To explain his resignation, Konoe himself said to his chief cabinet secretary Tomita : «I felt the Emperor was telling me "my prime minister does not understand military matters, I know much more". In short, the Emperor has absorbed the view of the Army and Navy high command.» --Flying tiger 14:26, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Taierzhuang.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Taierzhuang.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:55, 12 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. John Smith's 22:55, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. However I can see that the pictures listed above also do not have source information. Technically they could be deleted now, as you removed the "no source" tag without providing one. Please go through all your pictures attributing the source AND giving a description of the picture from the source. John Smith's 10:57, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Civility[edit]

Please use different language when disagreeing with folks. Some of your posts to Betacommand's talk page today have been quite inappropriate and serve to weaken your argument in the eyes of your peers. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 22:50, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

screw it, more people are pissed off at him than anything I've said. Blueshirts 03:11, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't change the fact that he is correct. Mob rule does not trump legal liability for the project, nor does it excuse your incivility. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 15:06, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

At which point did I (or any of us) want to "trump legal liability" of the project? We're pissed off at his method of racking up unproductive edits. Instead of leaving a one week deletion notice beneath the image in the main article namespace, he summarily removes it from the article, so no one would know what happened, and then leaves countless notices on the uploaders' talk page, many of whom have not editted for a quite while and apparently would not be able to respond to the rationale request. You're right I shouldn't have called him stupid, but what the guy's been doing is lazy and irresponsible. And apparently he listens to nobody and does not compromise with the vast majority of editors who agree with wikipedia policy but not his method at dealing with the problem and his very limited ability to discuss the issue other than referring to rule section so and so. Blueshirts 17:00, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blueshirts, you need to stop the incivility. Just cause you think he's wrong doesn't mean you get to violate wikipedia policy yourself. Consider this a warning. ⇒ SWATJester ^{Denny Crane.} 05:58, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Are you blind or something? In the previous post I already said I shouldn't have called him stupid. And that was on the 18th. Why do you wait till the 22nd and out of the blue to post this ridiculous "warning" on my page? Give me a break. Blueshirts 07:06, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Men in Black Poster.jpg[edit]

Hello Blueshirts, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Men in Black Poster.jpg) was found at the following location: User talk:Blueshirts/talk01. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Please note that it is possible that the image on your page is included vie a template or usebox. In that case, please find a free image for the template or userbox. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 13:32, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the welcome[edit]

Thank you very much for your welcome message. As to your question, hush hush ;) --PalaceGuard008 00:04, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XV (May 2007)[edit]

The May 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 14:26, 9 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration#Certified.Gangsta 2[edit]

Hello,

A request for arbitration has been filed regarding the conduct of Certified.Gangsta.

Can I trouble you to write a statement at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration#Certified.Gangsta 2 recounting your interactions with him and your impressions of his conduct as an editor?

Thanks.

LionheartX 07:41, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Again[edit]

Hello BlueShirts, Do you still remember me? I have returned to Wikipedia. I am just dropping by to say Hello. Hope to talk to you again. =) Heqong 02:34, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

on The Battle of China[edit]

I have made a Wikipedia:Requests for page protection for The Battle of China. Please discuss with user:Hare-Yukaiin the talk page. Thank you.Penpen0216 04:17, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Generalissimo[edit]

Chiang_Kai-shek#Tutelage_over_China used the term. I think 蔣元帥 is a usage in Chinese also.--Jerry 22:41, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

45,700 ghits for the term.--Jerry 15:34, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

38,900 ghits for "Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek" -wikipedia.

I know you said in Chinese but this is the English Wikipedia. I just wanted you to know that it is a pretty common usage in English.--Jerry 17:25, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

picture talk[edit]

Who Owns This?[edit]

This image's copyright status seems to be severely muddled. It is found throughout the Internet, but the authorship of the image appears to be lost to the ages. I have seen reference to a H.S. Wong, apparently a Chinese-American photographer working for William Randolph Hearst in an article questioning the photo's validity (Here), however, even that is weak evidence at best. Any idea what should be done until the copyright status is sorted out? -- Xanadu 02:42, 30 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Nanking or Shanghai?[edit]

This picture was believed taken in Shanghai (in or near the Shanghai Railway Station). It was about August 13th, 1937, the day on which the Japanese launched the Battle of Shanghai.--Captmjc 09:17, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This Page says Shanghai: [3]

--Kingruedi 7 July 2005 13:12 (UTC)

This picture was taken by H. S. Wong at Shangahi South Station in Nantao on August 28, 1937, which was probably reprinted from his newsreel. This picture appeared in LIFE of Oct. 4, 1937 and similar pictures in LOOK of Dec. 21, 1937. Please remember H. S. Wong took pictures at Vietnam war. I don't belive this picture is public domain.

LIFE, OCTOBER, 4, 1937 p.102
THE CAMERA OVERSEAS:136,000,000 PEOPLE SEE THIS PICTURE OF SHANGHAI'S SOUTH STATION

(picture)
After 16 Japanese bombing planes had flown home, Aug.28,H.S.("Newsreel")Wong, famous Hearst cameraman, was first to reach the dreadful scene at the Shanghai South Station. He got this picture- of-the-week--a Chinese baby amid the wreckage. A print of it was sent through International News Service to all Hearst newspapers, totaling 25,000,- 000 readers, and to 35 non-Hearst paper totaling 1,750,000. It went in a mat reproduction to 800 other papers in the U.S., totaling 4,000,000. To for- eign nwespapers International distributed the same picture, adding another estimated 25,000,000 readers. In the "News of the Day" newsreel, the sequence containing the baby was seen by some 25,000,000 movie-goers. Movietone News bought it, showed it to another 25,000,000. Together both newsreels are showing it to another 30,000,000 movie-goers abroad. This Chinese baby's potential audience: 136,000,000.

p.103

(picture) The same Chinese baby as shown on oposite page in Shanghai's South Station wreckage was taken in charge by a Chinese Boy Scout and given first aid on the station platform.

I have examined the picture and posted pictures and my articles at the following URLs:

Pictures from 16mm Castlefilms "News Parade: The Year of 1937" and articles from George C. Bruce, "Shanghai's Undeclared War" and SHUHSI HSU, "The War Conduct of The Japanese"
LOOK of Dec. 21, 1937
Articles form LOOK of Dec. 21, 1937

--Watanabe Hisashi 14:05, 4 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

add the above from the talk page at commons. Blueshirts 20:13, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XVI (June 2007)[edit]

The June 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 13:25, 8 July 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Image:Fake Photograph as BuriedAlive.jpg[edit]

I would like you to know you have wrongly tagged this image as "orphaned fair use" when in fact it is a public domain image. Furthermore you nominated it for deletion less than 3 weeks after another nomination. Cheers. -Nard 15:40, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RfC on Nanking Massacre[edit]

User:John Smith's has filed a Request for Comment on Nanking Massacre - [4] - about whether or not to include the article in the "Genocide" category. Please comment in the Talk page if you have an opinion on the matter. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 17:51, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to leave the discussion on the Nanking Massacre talk page[5] - it's really taking time away from the article editing that I want to do. I've asked John Smith's to let the RfC run for a couple more days to see if anybody wants to continue. If nobody wants to continue, he'll just delete the Genocide category and I won't oppose him, even though I disagree with it. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 17:02, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Allegations of Chinese apartheid[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Wikipedia has a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Using different styles throughout the encyclopedia, as you did to Allegations of Chinese apartheid, makes it harder to read. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Tiggerjay 23:25, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to use disruptive or hard to read formatting, as you did to Allegations of Chinese apartheid, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Tiggerjay 23:25, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Blueshirts. We haven't met, so my request is a bit awkward. Your comment about Taiwan is interesting, but I don't feel it deals with the questions I am asking. If you don't mind terribly, could you remove it from my Comments section? I'd appreciate it. Thanks. HG | Talk 23:07, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It needs to stay. It's the prime example showing how crappy the entire article is. Blueshirts 02:00, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mao[edit]

Blueshirts - the reason I'm reverting you on the Mao talk page is because wikipedia talk pages are for discussing the article - your merely discussing the topic, which is not allowed.--daniel folsom 23:31, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The hacked up image is back[edit]

Looks like Hare-Yukai has re-uploaded a slightly modified version of his image, after it was deleted.[6] Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 02:05, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Wikipedia email[edit]

I really don't care about these arguments anymore. What is it they say about a leopard and its spots? -- 我♥中國 17:16, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

not sure about the animal. Blueshirts 22:49, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator selection[edit]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are looking to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by August 14! Kirill 02:40, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Shanghai[edit]

I was wondering if you have further plans for Battle of Shanghai. It doesn't look far from a GA or FA. -- 我♥中國 20:26, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

yesI have to add the citations and stuff, been pretty busy lately. Blueshirts 06:51, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator election[edit]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators from a pool of fourteen candidates to serve for the next six months. Please vote here by August 28! Wandalstouring 09:06, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rabota[edit]

He said he made the video, so he basically admitted he is Tamagawaboat. I don't know about his blog, and I know nothing about the politics and history involved here, but I do find it interesting that Frank Capra may have engaged in a little bit of truth-bending-for-hire. It's original research, to be sure, but if it's generated enough attention from reliable sources, the Fake of Nanking may actually deserve its own article. I think his identity and the content of his blog are irrelevant to the issue whether it is original research and the copyright issues. -- But|seriously|folks 04:59, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for Violating WP:3RR[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule . Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. seriously

[7] [8] [9] [10] intervening warning [11]. You are also harassing the other user. He obviously does not want to answer your question and you have no right to pressure him to do so. -- But|seriously|folks 17:44, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

that's BS. I also asked another question regarding the offensive video he emailed me. Blueshirts 18:59, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

3RR[edit]

You've violated it. Revert yourself, please. Hornplease 18:36, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was undoing blatant vandalism, please. Blueshirts 18:36, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Block[edit]

Hi Blueshirts, you have been reported for 3RR violation on Radhabinod Pal and have been blocked for 48 hours, as this is a repeat violation. Please take the time off to carefully review WP:3RR and refrain from violating our rules when you return to editing. If you persist, you will be blocked for progressively longer periods. I hope you make the right choice. Thanks, Crum375 21:08, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XVIII (August 2007)[edit]

The August 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 09:05, 5 September 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Second Sino Japanese War[edit]

Hi Blueshirts. Just a reminder that you shouldn't use misleading edit summaries. It's rather bad form. Thanks. Parsecboy 23:29, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XIX (September 2007)[edit]

The September 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 09:04, 8 October 2007 (UTC) [reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XX (October 2007)[edit]

The October 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 13:33, 3 November 2007 (UTC) [reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXI (November 2007)[edit]

The November 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 01:01, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXII (December 2007)[edit]

The December 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:15, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator election[edit]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by February 14! TomStar81 (Talk) 01:52, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIII (January 2008)[edit]

The January 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:14, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIV (February 2008)[edit]

The February 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:00, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXV (March 2008)[edit]

The March 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:37, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVI (April 2008)[edit]

The April 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:15, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVII (May 2008)[edit]

The May 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:03, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Romanization Question[edit]

Hey there - I noticed you reverted my edit here. Could you explain to me why romanization isn't used in articles? I'm totally fine with it, but since I'm interested in contributing further to Chinese-related articles, it'd be good to know the rationale and such. Thanks! Corvus coronoides _talk 21:57, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

First WP:3RR warning Comfort Woman[edit]

With regard to your deletion of my work return the Comfort woman article back to your revision of 2 days (Revision as of 09:24, 14 June 2008 to Revision as of 19:27, 12 June 2008 (edit) [12] was vandalism.

If you wish to involve yourself, please engage on the discussion page.

Please note;

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Comfort women. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution.

--60.42.252.111 (talk) 09:44, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Second warning for WP:3RR[edit]

This hardly needs explaining. re [13] You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Comfort women. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. --60.42.252.111 (talk) 10:01, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Third warning for WP:3RR[edit]

This is your third and final warning regarding your conduct on Comfort women

You might consider studying WP:OWN and consider mediation if you do not agree with the development of the article --60.42.252.111 (talk) 10:17, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism, as you did to Comfort women, will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Filed WP:3RR[edit]

I have filed a WP:3RR report at [14]

Please stop wasting other's time. Thank you. --60.42.252.111 (talk) 10:37, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Uptdated WP:3RR report with proceeding reversion, added specific reference to Caspian blue. Please see WP:MEAT --60.42.252.111 (talk) 13:34, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for edit warring[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule at Comfort women. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

TigerShark (talk) 15:57, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Blueshirts (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was undoing vandalism. The user has removed huge chunks of sourced information, book references, and twisted sentences that have citations already to twist the meaning to his pov. This is not a content dispute, but blatant and sneaky vandalism. Several users agree with me on this.

Decline reason:

That's almost exactly what the user you were edit-warring with said. The answer is the same for both of you: edit-warring is always against the rules, even when you are right. Instead, when your block expires, try one of the suggestions at WP:DISPUTE rather than violating 3RR. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 20:49, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Blueshirts (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You are mistaken. I have been reverting vandalism. Specifically, the user has been removing chunks of sourced information, in violation of blanking, and twisting the meaning of sourced statements, in violation of sneaky vandalism. This is not a content dispute and I have already said I have no problems with the user removing dead and blog links. Please read over the diffs themselves, thanks.

Decline reason:

reason —See reasons below. — Rlevse • Talk • 12:10, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Interestingly, upon reviewing the unblock, there are two issues: 1) The IP was in fact hopping and not signing in, undoubtedly intentionally, in order to avoid detection and to avoid a block (thus making a 3RR report irrelevant). 2) Everyone was in fact reverting this IP: User:Jaysweet, User:Caspian blue, User:Selket, User:Steven J. Anderson, User:Flying tiger, and naturally, User:Cluebot - none of whom (oddly) appear to be blocked. The problem was with the IP's behavior, not Blueshirts, and I'm not so sure that blindly applying 3RR is appropriate here. That said, Blueshirts has been blocked for 3RR in the past, and should know better by now, and there may be some meatpuppet issues: Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Caspian blue (User:Documentingabuse is the sock... claiming everyone else is a sock), so the block may be OK after all. The Evil Spartan (talk) 22:03, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I have been blocked twice before, particularly on the article on Judge Radihinod Pal, but that was a content dispute, in which me and the other guy had a lengthy discussion regarding a source we both had on hand, and that's why I did not challenge the 3RR block then, but this case is different. Blueshirts (talk) 22:11, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment.

I'm not going to decline the unblock request directly in this case, but merely express my view that a brief 24 hour block is both lenient and merited. Edit warring is not a solution to edit warring. — Athaenara ✉ 23:20, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So how do you deal with vandalism? Leave it be? -- Ned Scott 04:45, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, please see these below relevant links.
Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Documentingabuse
WP:ANI#Can sockpuppeter file a SSP file during his block? Block review also needed

User:Documentingabuse admits that he is a sock of the anon who violated 5RR two days ago, and 11RR today.[15] The SSP filed by the sockpuppeter should be deleted because it was done during his block sanction from bad-faith. Besides, I or others do not have any connection (well, at first glance of the Blueshirts' page, politically, I have a different point of view regarding ROC and RPC from Blueshirts). However, I think the block is not fair compared to the sockpuppeter's repeated disruption. Everyone said to the anon or /Documentingabuse to use talk page before making drastic changes on the article. That's all. Blueshirts' tried to the anon to regard consensus and discussion. The weird definition only held by the anon is nothing but a disruption. Besides, eI only reverted the anon's reversion one time, and due to his repeated revering war, I reported his/her 11RR violation. That's why the anon has some grudge and title the SSP under my username. Everyone who object to the anon's unilateral deletion should be blamed for meatpuppets? I don't think so. --Caspian blue (talk) 23:26, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

After reading the diffs I agree that, on their face, they indicate a content dispute, not the reversion of vandalism. However, given that this user reverted changes that were perceived as unhelpful by all editors involved except Documentingabuse (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), the now-blocked user behind the IPs, I think that the "reverting vandalism" defence is applicable in this case, even though it's a borderline case. I would unblock this user and have contacted the blocking admin. Sandstein 07:25, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was involved in several of the issues here. At least three socks, likely of Davkal, were active yesterday and I blocked all three. Also see Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets/Archive/June_2008#User:Caspian_blue. I'm unblocking here as I firmly believe Blueshirts was fighting a sock vandal. — Rlevse • Talk • 12:09, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is very bad form to reverse a block without attempting to communicate with the blocking admin. Also, edit warring is not the appropriate way to deal with a sockpuppet, unless they are vandalising. Using sockpuppets to engage in an edit war is not vandalism, it is sockpuppetry. Please consider discussing with the blocking admin before you next unblock somebody. TigerShark (talk) 12:41, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for the unblock. Blueshirts (talk) 04:13, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVIII (June 2008)[edit]

The June 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:02, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can you do me a favour?[edit]

上冯村委 is in Chinese, but needs translation. I tried a machine translation (to no avail, obviously). Would you be willing? Thanks in advance, weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 12:01, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Allegations of apartheid deletion notification[edit]

Some time ago, you participated in a deletion discussion concerning Allegations of Chinese apartheid. I thought you might like to know that the parent article, Allegations of apartheid, was recently nominated for deletion. Given that many of the issues that have been raised are essentially the same as those on the article on which you commented earlier, you may have a view on whether Allegations of apartheid should be kept or deleted. If you wish to contribute to the discussion, please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allegations of apartheid (fifth nomination). -- ChrisO (talk) 17:55, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIX (July 2008)[edit]

The July 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:36, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bentecbye[edit]

Hello, taiwan friend. i agree with you.

Bentecbye is a possibly another sock of Pabopa.[16] can you rfcu this user? Manacpowers (talk) 09:17, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

because my english is not a good. caspian blue do not like me. may, he reject my request. but your english is very good. please can you request rfcu of Bentecbye? Manacpowers (talk) 09:40, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

i did not says he is a Logitech95. but he is a possibly same user with Teconv, Webcamera, Pabopa (indefinite blocked user) and i agree with Bentecbye is one of them. can you request rfcu? Manacpowers (talk) 09:52, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

help[edit]

do me a favor and help me turn the mess at the bottom of my page into a table. ㄏㄨㄤㄉㄧ (talk) 03:09, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

i need help creating a new article.ㄏㄨㄤㄉㄧ (talk) 16:47, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election[edit]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on September 14!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:35, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXX (August 2008)[edit]

The August 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:33, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator election[edit]

The September 2008 Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fourteen candidates. Please vote here by September 30!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:20, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

classical chinese wikipedia[edit]

we should upload all chinese related image files to wikimedia commons, and start actively translating articles from english wikipedia to classical chinese. i dont like the mandarin wikipedia because there aer several chinese dialect wikis already, and classical chinese should be the only neutral chinese wiki to focus on.

because content on english wikipedia tends to "dissapear", like when those people who worship japanese just because of their manga and anime lol make "changes" to articles like sino japanese war. so everything should be safely on the chinese wikipedias first.ㄏㄨㄤㄉㄧ (talk) 20:23, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion on Talk:Second Sino-Japanese War that may be of interest[edit]

Hi, Blueshirts. I know you're a frequent editor of the article, so I wanted to hear your input on the discussion Paul Siebert and I have been having over the "result" section of the infobox. I'd like to achieve a wider consensus than just Paul and I. Regards, Parsecboy (talk) 22:51, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hullo[edit]

Yeah... been busy with real life... I'm assuming it is the same with you. And honestly, I'm a little tired of the constant bickering with no real progress, arguments not for the sake of improving the article but to prove whose virtual penis is bigger. Not just the Chinese-related articles either, it's a general trend. ... Or I could just be losing interest in the whole Wikipedia business and trying to rationalize it, haha... Миборовский (talk) 03:24, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

http://miborovsky.erpz.net/wiki/

Some time ago I tried to start an independent ~~wiki~~ repository for reliable information and conjecture based on such using the Wiki engine for SSJW, away from all the bullshit on WP... never got far. If we can get some people together for this project, it might be worthwhile... thoughts? Миборовский (talk) 03:32, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXI (September 2008)[edit]

The September 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:59, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese Civil War[edit]

The sources say "stalemate". That's why I cite them. I understand there is a big difference.

"Small-scale military incidents continued for several years, and then both sides entered a stalemate. By the beginning of the twenty-first century, even though the economies of the People's Republic of China (main-land China) and the Republic of China (Taiwan) have become closely interwoven, the Chinese civil war never has been formally ended."--pyl (talk) 04:51, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXII (October 2008)[edit]

The October 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:29, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIII (November 2008)[edit]

The November 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 15:59, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Wei Man[edit]

korean editor kuebie is preparing a vote to change name to a korean one, and canvassing korean editors, vote no on name change. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.155.158.150 (talk) 18:42, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIV (December 2008)[edit]

The December 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:08, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:孔祥熙 with adolf hitler.jpg

H. H. Kung, a Kuomintang official, with Adolf Hitler

File:Kuomintang officials with Adolf Hitler.jpg

H. H. Kung, a Kuomintang official, with Adolf Hitler and other Kuomintang officials.

- Adolf Hitler with Kuomintang officials
- President of Republic of China (Taiwan) Ma Ying Jeou giving hitler salute

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.107.73.83 (talk) 06:54, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXV (January 2009)[edit]

The January 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:12, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVI (February 2009)[edit]

The February 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:36, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

3RR report[edit]

Hello, I'm informing you that I'm reporting you to WP:AN3 for breaking 3RR on Taiwan. You made 5 reverts in one 24 hour period, and considering your block history, you absolutely should know better. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 11:52, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notice[edit]

Please do not continue an edit war on article Taiwan. This is the only warning you'll receive. Therefore continuing with the dispute will end up with you being blocked to prevent further disruption. A block will be for a lengthy period due to your history and experience with disputes. Because of your history, you should know that disputes must be handled via the talk pages to hash out the issues and to establish a consensus. You are advised to consider Wikipedia's dispute resolution policy for guidance. The other party has also been notified of relevant policy. Cheers, Nja²⁴⁷ 12:57, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 55 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. Nja²⁴⁷ 21:02, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: personal wiki software[edit]

Unfortunately, I have little experience with the actual setup of a wiki, so I'm not sure what a good software package might be. Sorry that I couldn't be of more help. Kirill ^[talk] [pf] 02:50, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Help, Request[edit]

These article Kuomintang and Republic of China frequently Vandalism by clown of taiwan independence , so I consider we need to endeavour protect these article. thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.105.23.96 (talk) 17:27, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why??[edit]

Hello. This is Trickster206. I'm just asking why you put under China then foreign support ? I mean the Chinese Communists were in it too. Between you and me, Im Chinese too. Just stop reverting it !!!!!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Trickster206 (talk • contribs) 22:32, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Second Sino-Japanese War[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Second Sino-Japanese War. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing.

HI[edit]

Stop editeing Second sino japanese war! Just leave it the way it is —Preceding unsigned comment added by Trickster206 (talk • contribs) 12:22, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stay off my talk page. I don't need some little kid telling me not to edit an article that I have contributed substantially. Blueshirts (talk) 17:41, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What?![edit]

Im not a kid thank you very much and you're just annoying. And anyways youve been told to stop. Ohhhh —Preceding unsigned comment added by Trickster206 (talk • contribs) 21:49, 27 May 2009 --Trickster206 (talk) 21:51, 27 May 2009 (UTC)Trickster[reply]

SUPPROT YOU[edit]

I strong support you in Second Sino-Japanese War article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JEVNK (talk • contribs) 04:01, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wedemeyer[edit]

I deleted him because his tenure was very short, but you made a good point so I agree with your decision to reinstate him. From what I knew Wedemeyer had a much higher EQ than Stilwell, that's why he was much more successful in working with the Chinese government. DCTT (talk) 03:22, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nanking Massacre[edit]

The article has issues with POV. I have attempted to rephrase the article with non-neutral language, which you have interpreted as POV-pushing. So, in what way should we introduce NPOV to the article? I look forward to your reply and assistance. just a little insignificant 12:04, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Shanghai[edit]

Please do not undo apparently good-faith edits without providing a sufficient edit summary first. Thanks. just a little insignificant 14:16, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was reverting unexplained removal. And for your information, I practically wrote the entire article two or three years ago, thank you very much. Blueshirts (talk) 14:50, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, oh, oops, my fault entirely! I misinterpreted the diff and thought you were reverting the addition of material. I appreciate the work you've done on the article, sorry for the trouble. ^_^ just a little insignificant 22:04, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

When you've put so much work into an article from the ground up, you can't help but feel owning it, but I do appreciate the sarcasm :) Blueshirts (talk) 18:31, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. Thanks for being so lighthearted about the whole issue! just a little insignificant 01:55, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Big problem at commons[edit]

When you have time, please go to commons:File talk:Flag of the Republic of China.svg, and voice your opinion, there are people trying to turn Blue Sky White Sun flag into a black flag. Arilang ^talk 11:22, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

re:thanks[edit]

No problem at all! I noticed you have a lot of sections piling up on your talk page. If you'd like, you could install a shoutbox for small comments. just a little insignificant 14:32, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Must watch video[edit]

1937 video-cast of Soong Mai-ling address to the world in English Arilang ^talk 06:45, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image of war[edit]

File:Type 97 Light Tank with burning house.jpg

Japanese Type 97 Light Armor tank with burning house.

This image is the clearest, plus it has color. Arilang ^talk 21:10, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA reassessment of Dixie Mission[edit]

I have conducted a reassessment of this article and found several unreferenced statements which need addressing. Details at Talk:Dixie Mission/GA1. The reassessment is on hold for seven days after which it may be delisted if it does not meet the GA criteria. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 16:46, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Message[edit]

Everyone can edit Wikipedia but your edit of the Second Sino Japanese war is unconsrutive. And I don't know or why you're doing this but cant you see that there are sources for the strength and cauaslites for the Japanese ? So stop it! --69.157.65.49 (talk) 14:07, 14 July 2009 (UTC)Unknown[reply]

There is consensus to remove all the allies from each side in the infobox. I've restored casualty numbers with a clear source. Blueshirts (talk) 23:08, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please suggest a good name[edit]

Please have a look at commons:中國遠征軍 and zh:中國遠征軍, and suggest a good translation name for en:wikipedia. Thanks. Arilang ^talk 19:56, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Must watch video[edit]

http://hi.baidu.com/02708002/blog/item/f3bf1e62caf349d58db10d92.html

I like the Homer-Mao body bit. Arilang ^talk 07:29, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Another must watch video[edit]

Arilang ^talk 16:33, 20 September 2009 (UTC) (ctrl-click)">http://uradio.cybercampus.hku.hk/player.php?1=1&programid=256 Arilang ^talk 16:33, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yen Chia-kan.jpg[edit]

The image on Commons is not covered by the selected license commons:Template:PD-ROC-exempt which is designed for works exempted from copyright as official documents. --Martin H. (talk) 02:19, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If the photo is older than 50 years it is public domain according to commons:Commons:Licensing#Republic of China under the license commons:Template:PD-Taiwan. Otherwise it is non-free. --Martin H. (talk) 02:38, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Must watch video[edit]

我的团长我的团 My Chief and My RegimentThe best Chinese TV drama I have ever watched, better than Towards the Republic. Arilang ^talk 08:04, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reginald Fleming Johnston[edit]

Johnston was appointed Professor of Chinese in the University of London in 1931, a post based at the School of Oriental and African Studies. And I think his testimony is primary source, Emperor Puyi sent a endorser on his book. Please read Twilight in the Forbidden City.--Bukubku (talk) 17:11, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes but what he wrote was a memoir and not a historical account. Like you said, it's a primary source, and one that is based on his first hand account. The fact of the matter is it would be ludicrous to state or imply that Manchukuo was founded by the Manchus, with only administrative help from Japan. Blueshirts (talk) 17:18, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Again, The book is historical testimony and Emperor Puyi put good word for his book. Manchukuo is papet or not, when the foundation time is Puyi's free will. And many countries recognized Manchukuo. Johnston is English, not Manchu, Chinese and Japanese. He is third person. ludicrous is your POV. Read the book, please.--Bukubku (talk) 17:27, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talk in Talk:Manchukuo, not here.--Bukubku (talk) 17:31, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

sure, but I don't get why you wrote here first. Blueshirts (talk) 17:33, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I didn't notice your comment at Talk:Manchukuo.--Bukubku (talk) 17:35, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ok Blueshirts (talk) 17:38, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi![edit]

Hello, there, how are you? I would like to ask you about the Manchukuo website I found. I have a question, is that website a forum site? I first thought it was the official government website based on the title. I first found the site when I was researching the International recognition of Kosovo (Manchukuo is now removed from the list). Can you please tell me about this site. Thank you. Oxana879 (talk) 21:06, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I really appreciate it. I do not even know why these sort of websites exist. Thanks for keeping out a watchful eye. Oxana879 (talk) 21:17, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi[edit]

Hi, please have a look at Lou Jing, may be you can add some comments? Arilang ^talk 14:02, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Another article:Tuanpai, please add comment. Arilang ^talk 04:47, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Breaking news[edit]

台湾大劫难《台湾大劫难》立委:立即停止两岸协议 should be a good wiki, and DYK front page? Arilang ^talk 21:35, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Obamao[edit]

What you think of this image?

File:Voa obamao.JPG

Arilang ^talk 03:38, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like some "communist chic" memorabilia, a bit retarded but what can you say? Blueshirts (talk) 07:12, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again[edit]

Please have a look at 维基文库:侵犯版权/2009年11月-廢除PD-manifesto特別提刪讨论页, Chinese wikisource plays an important role in wikipedia, but strangely, it is kind of empty. Please have a look when you have time. Arilang ^talk 16:16, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What you think?李典维 :四大奇谋消灭了蒋介石800万军队 Arilang ^talk 17:42, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Chineses soldiers dressed up as german pictures[edit]

Hello Blueshirts, I was wondering where di you found those pictures, if there were any database where we could find those picture or if you had to dig them from archives. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Blueshirts/Contributions

Regards, (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 10:26, 20 July 2011 (UTC).[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LVI, October 2010[edit]

Your Military history Newsletter

Project News: Editors for the newsletter, GAN backlog reduction drive
Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content
Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients
Editorial: EyeSerene sums up our "Five years of military history"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:02, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LVII, November 2010[edit]

Your Military History Newsletter

Project News: From the editors, "Military Historian of the Year", New Incubator, Black Project Report
Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content
Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients
Editorial: bahamut guides us through "Nominating military biographies for deletion"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:03, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LVIII, December 2010[edit]

Your military history newsletter – Volume LVIII, December 2010 From the editors • "Military Historian of the Year" • Discussions • The month's new featured and A-class content • Review awards Contest results • A-class medal recipients • bahamut teaches us proper usage of "Jargon and acronyms"
To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here. BrownBot (talk) 20:24, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Volume LVIX, January 2011[edit]

Your Military history Newsletter

Project News: From the editors
Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content
Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients
Editorial: EyeSerene discusses "Writing neutrally for Wikipedia"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 15:18, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LX, February 2011[edit]

Your Military History Newsletter

Project News: From the editors
Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content
Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients
Editorial: Ed talks about real-world collaborations and how you can help

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 21:16, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXI, March 2011[edit]

Your Military History Newsletter

Project News: From the editors
Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content
Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients
Editorial: Dank helps you see what article writers want from reviewers

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 01:19, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXII, April 2011[edit]

Your Military History Newsletter

Project News: From the editors
Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content
Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients
Editorial: Buggie111 discusses neutral point of view

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 21:57, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXIII, May 2011[edit]

Your Military History Newsletter

Project News: From the editors – Contest results, A-class medal recipients
Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content
Editorial: Hawkeye's thoughts on the article writing process

To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:10, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXIV, June 2011[edit]

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results
Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content
Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Finland and Spitfires
Op-ed: Fifelfoo and hunting for plagiarism

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 22:33, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXV, July 2011[edit]

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results
Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content
Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Zeebrugee and Afghanistan
Op-ed: WereSpielChequers examines RfA

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 21:36, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Military Historian of the Year[edit]

Nominations for the "Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so here. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of the coordinators, Nick-D (talk) and Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 22:44, 15 January 2012 (UTC) You were sent this message because you are a listed as a member of the Military history WikiProject.[reply]

Military history coordinator election[edit]

The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators (about the project • what coordinators do) 08:42, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Sino-german cooperation[edit]

I just wanted to thank you for researching and writing this article. It's an interesting topic that you hear almost nothing about elsewhere. I just watched an american documentary about chinese history 1900-1949 and it doesn't mention sino-german cooperation with one word. I also like your style of writing. I like articles that are clear and coherent, like an essay should be. Many contributors here, in their effort to be neutral and encyclopedic end up writing in a way that is simply dull and meaningless. Keep up the good work! Maybe you could write and article on sino-german relations after '49, both with mainland China and Taiwan. But that's just an idea. All the best to you. Hisredrighthand (talk) 00:04, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election[edit]

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 22:15, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

World War II infobox debate[edit]

Hello, I noticed that you voiced your opinion regarding the WWII in previous discussion, and I want to let you know there is an ongoing debate regrading the WWII infobox. Please see the section Talk:World War II#Request for comment: WWII infobox, Talk:World War II#WWII Infobox - bias debate that created a False dilemma and Talk:World War II#Remove Chiang Kai-shek form the Infobox Commanders and leaders — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.135.86.66 (talk) 17:52, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election[edit]

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 05:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Republic of China (Nanjing) listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Republic of China (Nanjing). Since you had some involvement with the Republic of China (Nanjing) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 00:57, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User group for Military Historians[edit]

Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive[edit]

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:27, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive[edit]

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:HansKlein von Reichenau CKS 1936.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:HansKlein von Reichenau CKS 1936.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]