User talk:Bleckter23

Bleckter23, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Bleckter23! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at White Brazilians, you may be blocked from editing. Do not add 9gag and other unreliable content to articles Not with all those rocks about (talk) 17:43, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Argentines of European descent. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please stop Not with all those rocks about (talk) 21:50, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Argentines of European descent. Triptothecottage (talk) 00:57, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 03:04, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bleckter23 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please, I need to be unlocked, I want to recover my original account https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Bleckter where I never had problems, and restart there, the real reason for what I did this account, is that I lost the other, and I try to recover. I ask pity. Thanks. --Bleckter23 (talk) 03:22, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you have forgotten your password and either did not activate email on your account, or have lost access to that email, recovery is impossible. Also, "never had problems" is a lie. I see multiple warnings and a block for edit warring. You are not blocked for using an alternate account - you are blocked for edit warring and then making false accusations against other editors. Someguy1221 (talk) 03:25, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ya Probably should block the other account too in case he remembers his password Jena (talk) 15:55, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What you need to explain, Bleckter, is http://heavy.com/entertainment/2014/07/costa-rican-fans-girls-hot-sexy-butts-ass-world-cup-2014/ . This has been asked of you a few times before and I cannot understand why you don't answer the simple question. To put this another way, right now your competence is doubtful. Drmies (talk) 16:10, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Abuse reverted, talk page access revoked. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:22, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
And posting childish messages on Meta isn't going to help your case. Drmies (talk) 17:30, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 19:16, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]