User talk:Binsarhills

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Binsarhills, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Estarosmārṭ (talk) 13:35, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Garhwali language, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Most of your changes have no references, if you wish to continue with them, I suggest you follow WP:BRD which is the proper procedure for a content dispute rather than putting your version back again. noq (talk) 06:40, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sir/madam, in response to your request, I have reverted to the earlier version however, keeping in mind your suggestions, unnecessary commentary has been removed. Secondly, usage of Takri script along with devanagari script has been well supported buly various citations and research articles. Mind you that I myself hail from the state and hence I make sure that whatever goes through my end is well backed with the knowledge and information passed onto me by the elders of the family. Thanks. Binsarhills (talk) 16:51, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I would be highly obliged if you would let me know what else requires further documentation. Binsarhills (talk) 16:52, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I would also like to know that what compelled you to misdirected the users from the page I created specifically for bangani dialect to the page created specifically for garhwali language Binsarhills (talk) 16:54, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Anticipating a reply. Binsarhills (talk) 21:36, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bangani[edit]

Hi - the article you wrote there (with what appears to be a deceptive edit summary - it wasn't a spelling correction) has no reliable sources (see WP:UGC), and uses entirely inappropriate POV language such as ascribing ignorance to the local government. If you want to write up a proper article, which is referenced to multiple reliable sources, be my guest, but don't reinstate that previous version. Thanks GirthSummit _(blether) 12:33, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again - I've just noticed the comments in the section above this one, and thought I'd explain a bit further. You may with to review Verifiability, one of our core policies, and Reliable sources, a set of guidelines which support it. Basically, editors should not rely on their own personal knowledge and experience when writing, they should only add content that is based on reliable published sources to that our readers can verify the assertions. It doesn't matter how knowledgeable you are, or how confident you are that what you are asserting is true - that isn't verifiable. Since we do not ask our editors to prove who they are, any of us could claim to be anything: I could put a note on my userpage claiming to have a PhD and twelve years experience of academic research into astrophysics, then start adding unsourced content to articles about space - but people would quiet correctly revert my additions, because they are unsourced. They would not know, or care, that the assertions on my userpage were complete lies, becuase it doesn't matter what my experience and background are - what matters is whether the content we add to articles is reliably sourced. So, in short, please do not add anything to our articles based on what you know about a place from having lived there, or on what the elders in your family have told you about it - only add content that you can support by reference to published sources that other people can check. I hope that makes sense. GirthSummit _(blether) 14:02, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, as I have previously stated, all the information put forward by me has been backed with sufficient proofs which include several research articles and appropriate citations. What I said about my ethinicicity was just like the cherry on top of the cake. I think that you must have misunderstood. Please let me know aid you find anything else inappropriate. Critisism is always welcome Binsarhills (talk) 16:25, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

correction: Please let me know if you find anything else inappropriate Binsarhills (talk) 16:26, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Since I am new to the platform, I would highly appreciate if you could guide me. Binsarhills (talk) 16:28, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Binsarhills, the article, in the state it was in when I redirected it, had zero reliable sources. You need to provide citations within the article so that others can see where the information is coming from. Best GirthSummit _(blether) 21:04, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GirthSummit, somone else has now created a new page for Bangani. You may review it if you want. It seems convincing to me. Binsarhills (talk) 18:56, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Binsarhills, I know - if you look at the article talk page, you'll see me discussing it with the person who created it. I have no problem with there being an article on the subject, it just needs to be neutrally written, and properly sourced, which this new one is. GirthSummit _(blether) 06:47, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, you might find WP:THREAD and WP:PING useful. Cheers GirthSummit _(blether) 06:48, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers🤘 Binsarhills (talk) 20:40, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting your input on Uttarakhand's talk page[edit]

Hi Binsarhills, since you have made edits on Uttarakhand before, I am sending you this message to alert you of a discussion on its talk page regarding the replacement of images in the infobox. Your input in this matter would be greatly appreciated. Prolix 💬 17:44, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Binsarhills (talk) 12:07, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Harul moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Harul, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Roller26 (talk) 11:05, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Harul (December 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Berrely was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Harul and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Harul, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Yours, Berrely • ^Talk∕_Contribs 20:44, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Binsarhills! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Yours, Berrely • ^Talk∕_Contribs 20:44, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 10[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kumaoni language, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kumaoni. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war[edit]

you should talk about adding Ranjana and prachalit script in Nepali language in its disscussion page. Dobt make an edit war PN27 (talk) 06:41, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Tehriyali dialect[edit]

Hello, Binsarhills. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tehriyali dialect, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:08, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Tehriyali dialect[edit]

Hello, Binsarhills. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tehriyali dialect".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:52, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]