User talk:Bindingtheory

Welcome!

Hello Bindingtheory, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Kilo-Lima 18:31, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Penn[edit]

It good to see that the article is finally getting a work over. Over the past several months before the end of the year, the article was starting to look like a broch from the admins department, rather then an article about the university. As for the status argument, their is no use talking to this guy, he has hit several articles University of Chigago, Yale, Princeton among them with the same mo, and basically the same edit summary, he has the tendancy to remove information on rankings, and admins. So just a heads up. --Boothy443 | trácht ar 06:43, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Preeminent echelon[edit]

I completely agree that once you say a university is in the Ivy League you don't need to say more. Anyone who isn't sure can always read the Ivy League article.

But that "preeminent echelon" phrase... where have I seen that recently... yes, this revision of University of Chicago, which says "The Graduate School of Business is part of the preeminent echelon of graduate management institutions world-wide." Very odd. I'm beginning to think that someone is deliberately inserting boosterism and peacockery in university articles just to annoy people. Dpbsmith (talk) 02:56, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Greaaaaaaat. So we have some people stuffing articles with boosteristic (?) fluff, and others deleting everything in sight on the off chance that it might be boosterism. Sometimes I feel like all I do is revert the crap that other people do. "The price of freedom is eternal vigilance." That should really be the official wikipedia motto. :) -Bindingtheory 03:35, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

purely in the interest of tracking the user, the u chicago "preeminent echelon" text looks like it was originally inserted by 70.174.191.106. In the UPenn article it was 68.162.74.130. -Bindingtheory 03:45, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

George W. Bush's Sixth State of the Union Address[edit]

Thank you for fixing the grammatical error I had on George W. Bush's Sixth State of the Union Address. Any work on this is very appreciated as few editors seem to have taken notice of it. The entire text of his speech is available at User:KI/Temp2. Thanks! KI 02:28, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

np. a couple of the "errors" i fixed weren't ungrammatical so much as they were in the wrong tense since they were written before the speech. I just created a page on Wikisource with the text of the speech, too, "as prepared for delivery" and linked it from the wikipedia page. -Bindingtheory 02:40, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

51 minutes[edit]

Hahaha-I take it you're also watching FOX? KI 03:07, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PBS actually. I like their commentators. -Bindingtheory 03:25, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PerfectTwinks Blog[edit]

Hey, keep up your perfect twinks blog. (http://perfecttwinks.blogspot.com/) It is much appreciated.

Violent Crime... wikilinks[edit]

Just a note that wikipedia automatically converts spaces in wikilinks to underscores. That means you can use the normal page titles directly ([[Violent crime and suicide at Ivy League universities]]) instead of having to give an underscored form for the link and an alternative one with spaces for display ([[Violent_crime_and_suicide_at_Ivy_League_universities|Violent crime and suicide at Ivy League universities]]). DMacks 16:43, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DMacks. That's really good to know. Has it always done that? I always thought I had to include the underscores, which is kind of a pain the butt. Thanks! -Bindingtheory 21:09, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've never known it not to do it, but I've been here less than a year. DMacks 21:20, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Daily Pennsylvanian[edit]

Hi Bindingtheory--I'm a reporter from Penn's student newspaper, The Daily Pennsylvanian, and I'm working on a story about the school's wikipedia page. Since I know you're a frequent contributor to its upkeep, i was wondering if it would be possible for me to ask you a few questions. Please get back to me. Thanks, Jason

Heroes "Graphic Novels"[edit]

I added some definitions and sources on why the Heroes comics can not be legitimately called graphic novels. As the person who started that discussion, I thought you would like to know. Link for easy reference: Graphic Novels? Valaqil 17:40, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Much appreciated! Thanks for letting me know! -Bindingtheory 22:40, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

invited to add to discussion on Straight pride article[edit]

I am inviting everyone who has previously added to consensus to return to weigh in on an edit war of the over use of "Straight Pride Wear"" clothing store as a link and as a reference source.--Amadscientist 03:59, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 9[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Jim Mills (banjo player), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bluegrass (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Bindingtheory. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Bindingtheory. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Bindingtheory. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]