User talk:Bgc7676

Bad Girls Club Season 12 page should be unblocked due to the fact of the wiki page being edited incorrect. However I can help with it's edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Superwoman23 (talk • contribs) 04:13, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Bgc7676, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Nastasia "Stasi" Townsend, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 06:32, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nastasia "Stasi" Townsend[edit]

The article Nastasia "Stasi" Townsend has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 06:32, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm Recollected. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Bad Girls Club (season 10) because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! – Recollected • 14:05, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bad Girls All-Star Battle (season 2)‎. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. – Recollected • 23:41, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Bad Girls Club (season 13)— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 04:13, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bad Girls Club (season 8). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 02:07, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bad Girls Club (season 7). EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 02:09, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm Ueutyi. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Big Brother 7 (U.S.) has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Ueutyi (talk) 06:20, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Big Brother Canada (season 4), you may be blocked from editing. –Qpalzmmzlapq T C 23:36, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Big Brother Canada (season 4). — Music1201 ^talk 00:15, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016[edit]

Your comment that said "Leave This Here As Well As Michelle Being Put As BB Care Package. Changing will be considered vandalism" is not how Wikipedia works. You don't get to make vandalism threats, for removed information. Hawkeye75 (talk) 07:50, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Big Brother 18 (U.S.) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Chase (talk) 15:35, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Big Brother 18 (U.S.). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been undone.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Chase (talk) 18:06, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Big Brother 18 (U.S.).

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Chase (talk) 18:09, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Big Brother 18 (U.S.). Regards, James (^talk/_contribs) 19:18, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Bgc7676 reported by User:James Allison (Result: ). Thank you. Regards, James (^talk/_contribs) 19:44, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion[edit]

You do realize making further edits to Big Brother 18 (U.S.), make you vulnerable to an indef. block correct? Cheers Hawkeye75 (talk) 20:56, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Bgc7676: Please go [here] and discuss the changes you wish to make before making any further changes. Thanks, Chase (talk) 21:04, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm CCamp2013. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Big Brother 18 (U.S.) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Chase (talk) 18:50, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Big Brother 18 (U.S.), did not appear constructive and have been undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Chase (talk) 03:58, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Big Brother 18 (U.S.) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Chase (talk) 04:14, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm CCamp2013. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Big Brother 15 (U.S.) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Chase (talk) 21:40, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Big Brother 15 (U.S.) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Chase (talk) 18:03, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Bgc7676 reported by User:CCamp2013 (Result: ). Thank you. Chase (talk) 19:48, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Big Brother 15 (U.S.). Please stop removing and adding information to this article. It is very disruptive. Chase (talk) 20:00, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Big Brother 15 (U.S.)[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. It is hard to see the motivation for your edits -- some of them look random. If you intend to participate further on the Big Brother articles, you should use the talk pages. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 17:08, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Bgc7676. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Big Brother 15 (U.S.), you may be blocked from editing. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 04:06, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017[edit]

Stop vandalizing! Hawkeye75 (talk) 07:27, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

BBCAN 5[edit]

As I have already explained my revisions, please do not undo them without a sufficient explanation. VietPride10 (talk) 02:51, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop changing it, as I have already explained "Demetres choice" needs to not be warped, so it does not have a line break. If you look at the other Big Brother pages, there is always only two line breaks and not three, which I fixed with template.VietPride10 (talk) 22:08, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

For the third time, please explain the issue you have with my edits and do not call them "vandalism" when you have no explanation for doing so. I have tried to communicate with you again and again, but it seems like you are ignoring me. VietPride10 (talk) 22:36, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding your recent edits. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. The discussion is about the topic Disruptive editing. VietPride10 (talk) 23:48, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Warring[edit]

Please stop edit warring and seek consensus for the changes, If you both revert one more time I'll report both of you at AN3 which I really don't want to do so as I said go to the talkpage and get consensus for or against the wrapping thing,
Also I've gave this warning to the other party aswell, Anyway thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 02:10, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Warping[edit]

I have already explained numerous times, that some of the eviction votes have to be warped so it only has two line breaks instead of three, which causes an inconsistency. You are also editing on mobile, which can distort the way the actual voting table looks normally. So please, stop changing the edit without explaining why. I have explained specifically to you already, numerous times, and you just keep reverting it. VietPride10 (talk) 02:32, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.[edit]

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard#Talk:Big Brother Canada (season 5)#Wrapping regarding Edit warring. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "thread name".The discussion is about the topic Topic. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! VietPride10 (talk) 19:19, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Big Brother 17 (U.S.). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please stop undoing edits without any explanation, you have done it repeatedly. VietPride10 (talk) 01:18, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Bgc7676[edit]

User:Bgc7676, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Bgc7676 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Bgc7676 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 13:45, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017[edit]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Big Brother 18 (U.S.).

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. VietPride10 (talk) 01:02, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. –Davey2010^Talk 02:22, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Bgc7676 reported by User:Davey2010 (Result: ). Thank you. –Davey2010^Talk 15:00, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring on 'nowrap' on Big Brother articles[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring, as you did at Big Brother 18 (U.S.). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Any admin may lift this block if you will agree to make no further edits regarding 'nowrap' on Big Brother articles until a consensus is found. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 16:17, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Bgc7676[edit]

User:Bgc7676, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Bgc7676 (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Bgc7676 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 10:40, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Big Brother 19 (U.S.). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. VietPride10 (talk) 16:48, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Bgc7676. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018[edit]

Hello, I'm CASSIOPEIA. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Smoke inhalation— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 05:03, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it is suspected that it has been compromised. If you are able to confirm that you are the user who created this account, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section), then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.Courcelles (talk) 05:25, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note that CU says this account is not compromised, but the behaviour clearly says it is, so I'm leaving this template here for now. Courcelles (talk) 05:26, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]