User talk:Beth Holmes 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Beth Holmes 1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!  -- WikHead (talk) 07:57, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Thanks for welcome and help[edit]

You're most certainly welcome Beth... thank you for your message. I might look and act like a bot at times, but don't let that fool you ;). I can see that you've been working very hard on the Sarek National Park article, and I'm glad to know that I haven't been getting in your way with my fixes. Best of luck to you with future developments of the article. Have yourself a great day, and happy editing! :)  -- WikHead (talk) 18:18, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Rhufoniog (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Rhos
Sarek National Park (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Delta
Yellow Fever in Buenos Aires (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to John Coghlan

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Translation help[edit]

Greetings Beth, there has been a proposal on the Prem Rawat article talk page to include some info from a 2.5 min news clip from Univision Channel 41, the largest Spanish language TV network in the US. Since the Prem Rawat article is one of the most intensely debated article on Wikipedia and subject to article probation it would be best if we made sure the translation was accurate. If you're able to do it, the clip can be found at [1]. Thanks. Momento (talk) 06:39, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I was hoping that there was more material than the subtitles provided. They seam to do a lot more talking than the subtitles suggest. Thanks Momento (talk) 13:16, 11 February 2012 (UTC) Thanks Beth.Momento (talk) 19:58, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Sarek National Park, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hackberry (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:41, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Sarek National Park, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WWF (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:08, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Compagnie des Transports Strasbourgeois[edit]

Hi Beth,

I've spent a couple of days translating the rest of Compagnie des Transports Strasbourgeois, which you started, adding in templates {{CTS line}} and {{CTS line 2010}} and their sub-templates, and checking all the refs. You may like to cast your eye over it: No doubt there are numerous typos, slips, inconsistencies and some clumsy translation (e.g. unnatural word order), which I tend to miss when translating (the refs and links usually take most of the time and make one a little word-blind to the actual text).

Everything's marked on the relevant talk pages with {{translated page}}, as required.

Best wishes Si Trew (talk) 10:56, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Rosetta Barnstar[edit]

The Rosetta Barnstar
Thank you, Beth Holmes 1, for you excellent work on Sarek National Park‎! I (and 2000 readers in the past month) appreciate your work and wish you the best of luck on future projects, jonkerz ♠talk 15:37, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Beth Holmes 1. You have new messages at SimonTrew's talk page.
Message added 09:41, 18 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Take to GA or DYK? Si Trew (talk) 09:41, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to tea[edit]

Teahouse logo
Hello! Beth Holmes 1, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. An awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! Charles (talk) 14:44, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A brownie for you![edit]

Hi Beth! I just wanted to drop off this freshly baked Wiki-brownie and to say thanks for all the great work you are doing on Wikipedia. I'm also happy to see the community thanking you for that work (awesome barnstar!). Feel free to say hi or drop by the Teahouse if you need anything. Happy editing! Sarah (talk) 03:22, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Translation needed[edit]

Hi,

Will you please be so kind to help me with one translation:

"Skanderbeg aux temps de son insurrection (Skanderbeg avait confié la défense de Kruje à Uran, au temps où celle-ci avait été assiégée par Murad II en 1450, tandis que Skanderbeg avait préféré se battre en dehors de ses murs)'3. Puisqu'il est porté mention d'Urana dans notre régistre, et qu'il est le père du scribe appelé Zaganos, il faut conjecturer qu'il devait être en âge assez avancé. On sait que le Comte Uran est mort en 1458. D'une note dans le même document on apprend qu'en mai 1438 ' 5, neuf villages du vildyet de Dhimitër Jonima (Dimitri Gônima, Gionima), dans le Mali supérieur, et qui appartenaient à Skanderbeg, avaient été octroyés à André Karlo. Selon toute vraisemblance cela est à rattacher à la révocation de Skanderbeg du poste de subaçi. Ces neuf villages, toujours selon le registre en question, étaient situés dans les terres de Jean (Yuvan-ili), c'est-à-dire qu'ils appartenaient aux domaines de Jean Kastriote, le père de Skanderbeg. Jean, quoique réussi, devant la pression de Mehmed 1er, à garder pour un certain temps encore ses positions sous le protectorat vénitien, dans les premières années du règne de Murad II fut absolument obligé d'entrer sous la vassalité ottomane. La note en question, datée 1438, ne laisse subsister aucun doute que c'est autour de cette date que ces terres avaient été cadastrées. Les neuf villages en question, compte tenu qu'ils se trouvaient sur le Registre de Yuvan-ili (Jean Kastriote), sont du domaine du père de Skanderbeg. L'octroi de ces villages à André Karlo doit avoir fâché Skanderbeg. Quoique l'Etat ottoman considérât ces terres des domaines d'Etat attribuables en timar, pour Skanderbeg il s'agissait des domaines seigneuriaux de son père. Jean Kastriote est mort en 1443.. Comme nous le dit Chalcocondy- las après la retraite des Ottomans dans les Balkans en 1443 devant l'Hunyade, les anciens seigneurs se dépêchèrent de tous les côtés à rentrer en possession des domaines de leurs pères. Skanderbeg abandonne l'armée du Sultan,, vient et s'empare de Kruje, et. en sa qualité de seigneur de Kastriote, prend possession des domaines de son père, qu'on avait octroyé à d'autres. En été 1444, comme tous les autres du reste,, Skanderbeg, aussi était convaincu que les Ottomans allaient être chassés complètement des Balkans. Cependant, la défaite subie par les Croisés à la bataille de Varna, fit s'évanouir ces espoirs. Après avoir traité brièvement du lien qui passe entre l'insurrection de Skanderbeg avec Kruje, nous pouvons retourner aux notes qui figurent sur les registres ottoman toujours pour ce qui concerne Kruje. Dans le registre17 de l'an 1432, nous trouvons la note suivante : "Akçahisar (Kruje) même est un château de pierre, gardé par les suivants : selon les documents délivrés par le regretté sultan (Mehmed Ier) et le sultan de notre temps"

It is a text from work of Halil İnalcık, From empire to republic: essays on Ottoman and Turkish social history.

Please inform me at my talkpage if you did have some time to translate this.

Thanks in advance.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 21:53, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply. This is not urgent. The text is relatively longer but I think very important, so please take all the time you need.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 22:00, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. I intend to use your translation in article building soon. I hope you would not mind if I approach again to you in case of need for additional clarification. I really appreciate your effort. Thank you very much.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 14:48, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

National Route 7 (Argentina) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Junín, San Martín, Luján, Los Penitentes, Córdoba Province, Rufino and Haedo

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:33, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Khutir Nadia.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Khutir Nadia.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 01:44, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 11[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Roparz Hemon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Brest and Breton
Tourism in Réunion (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Saint-Pierre and Creole

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Explosions in Dnipropetrovsk 2012[edit]

Hello, Beth Please check out this article and quickly correct errors. Large Ukrainian THANKS --Dfy191 (talk) 14:20, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]


meta:Meetup/Cambridge/15[edit]

Any chance you could confirm one way or the other?©Geni 15:33, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please fill out our brief Teahouse guest survey[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at WP:Teahouse would like your feedback! We have created a brief survey meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Wikipedia. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests pages sometime in the last few months.

Click here to be taken to the survey site.

The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!

Happy editing,

J-Mo, Teahouse host

This message was sent via Global message delivery on 00:26, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Spanish translation[edit]

Hello. I was on Wikipedia:Translators available and notice that you were on the list for Spanish to English translators and wondered if you could translate Henry II of Castile, Henry III of Castile, Henry IV of Castile? Thanks.--Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy (talk) 14:47, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Would it be okay to add Philip of Castile (archbishop) to your worklist? --Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy (talk) 21:22, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
What happen with Henry IV of Castile? Hope something bad didn't happen to you. --The Emperor's New Spy (talk) 20:34, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cambridge fresher's fair[edit]

Hello Beth,

I've bid a stall on behalf of the Cambridge University Wikipedia Society at the Cambridge University fresher's fair, 2-3 October. If you are around, it would be great if you can come and help by staffing the stall for a few hours!

The fair will run, roughly, from 9am to 7pm on the 2nd, and 9am to 4pm on the 3rd; details are yet to be confirmed.[2] You certainly won't be expected to stay the whole day unless you really want to! It'll be a sign-up stall for the campus Wikipedia Society, and we'll give out Wikimedia freebies at the event to promote awareness for Wikipedia-editing and Wikimedia UK.

Please contact me if you're interested in helping, even if it's just a few hours. Thanks! (You're receiving this message because you've signed up for a recent Cambridge meetup - apologies if you aren't around anymore) Deryck C. 22:33, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 11[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2002 Molise earthquake, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Apennine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:08, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tourism in Réunion[edit]

Cite error: The named reference risque was invoked but never defined >>> see https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tourism_in_R%C3%A9union&diff=486251102&oldid=486230417 Please take a look --Frze > talk 10:54, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Serge Tisseron[edit]

Hi! As part of a university course, I asked my French students to write the article about Serge Tisseron (which already existed in French). I think they do a good job (nobody contributed to Wikipedia before), but the quality of English is not good. Can help us check grammar, syntax, and so on? Or can you transfer the request to someone who could help us? Many thanks! IntraLucide (talk) 12:55, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thanks a lot for your work on the article Serge Tisseron! Well, to be honest, I have no idea what the sentence you pointed out was supposed to mean. Maybe something like : "and made sure that the direction taken would be well followed"? Well, I'm not convinced by my own words actually! :-) IntraLucide (talk) 15:13, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possible translation?[edit]

Dear Beth,
There is a very interesting article that just obtained a featured status on the French Wikipedia. It is describing a statuette found in Tunisia and representing Ganymede. It has a particularity: it has been stolen in November 2013 and thus attracted media attention.
As I saw you were listed in available translators from French, I was just wondering if you would be interested to translate this article and participate to sharing the knowledge about this artwork with the English-speaking readers. You can answer me on my talk page. Regards, Moumou82 (talk) 11:28, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Translation Help[edit]

Bonjour Beth! Unfortunately that is the extent of my French, which is why I'm here. Would you be interested in translating the AIG business page to bring the French version up-to-date? Thanks so much! MsGingerHoneycutt (talk) 21:09, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Article upgrade assistance request (Pre-translation stage)[edit]

Seasons Greetings,

This is in reference to a relatively new umbrella article on en-wikipedia named Ceremonial pole. Ceremonial pole is a human tradition since ancient times; either existed in past at some point of time, or still exists in some cultures across global continents from north to south & from east to west. Ceremonial poles are used to symbolize a variety of concepts in several different world cultures.

Through article Ceremonial pole we intend to take encyclopedic note of cultural aspects and festive celebrations around Ceremonial pole as an umbrella article and want to have historical, mythological, anthropological aspects, reverence or worships wherever concerned as a small part.

While Ceremonial poles have a long past and strong presence but usually less discussed subject. Even before we seek translation of this article in global languages, we need to have more encyclopedic information/input about Ceremonial poles from all global cultures and languages. And we seek your assistance in the same.

Since other contributors to the article are insisting for reliable sources and Standard native english; If your contributions get deleted (for some reason like linguistics or may be your information is reliable but unfortunately dosent match expectations of other editors) , please do list the same on Talk:Ceremonial pole page so that other wikipedians may help improve by interlanguage collaborations, and/or some other language wikipedias may be interested in giving more importance to reliablity of information over other factors on their respective wikipedia.

This particular request is being made to you since your user name is listed in Wikipedia:Translators available list.

Thanking you with warm regards Mahitgar (talk) 05:38, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Article upgrade assistance request (Pre-translation stage)[edit]

Seasons Greetings,

This is in reference to a relatively new umbrella article on en-wikipedia named Ceremonial pole. Ceremonial pole is a human tradition since ancient times; either existed in past at some point of time, or still exists in some cultures across global continents from north to south & from east to west. Ceremonial poles are used to symbolize a variety of concepts in several different world cultures.

Through article Ceremonial pole we intend to take encyclopedic note of cultural aspects and festive celebrations around Ceremonial pole as an umbrella article and want to have historical, mythological, anthropological aspects, reverence or worships wherever concerned as a small part.

While Ceremonial poles have a long past and strong presence but usually less discussed subject. Even before we seek translation of this article in global languages, we need to have more encyclopedic information/input about Ceremonial poles from all global cultures and languages. And we seek your assistance in the same.

Since other contributors to the article are insisting for reliable sources and Standard native english; If your contributions get deleted (for some reason like linguistics or may be your information is reliable but unfortunately dosent match expectations of other editors) , please do list the same on Talk:Ceremonial pole page so that other wikipedians may help improve by interlanguage collaborations, and/or some other language wikipedias may be interested in giving more importance to reliablity of information over other factors on their respective wikipedia.

This particular request is being made to you since your user name is listed in Wikipedia:Translators available list.

Thanking you with warm regards Mahitgar (talk) 06:16, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Beth Holmes 1. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request[edit]

Dear Beth, an IP claiming to be you is asking for your account to be unblocked. If it is you, you should make an unblock request here using the {{Unblock}} template and providing a reason as to why you should be unblocked. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:33, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Beth Holmes 1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My account was blocked because it was thought to be a sockpuppet of the user Kspellskarthik. According to the sockpuppet investigation, the evidence came from CheckUser saying that my account was confirmed to be linked to 3 others and likely to Kspellskarthik. It also said: "The accounts in the archives and the accounts listed below often use servers that hide their true locations." I do not have access to the CheckUser data. However my hypothesis is because I work for a big company and sometimes edit while VPN'd to their servers, it makes my IP address look like these other people's. Otherwise it may be because I have sometimes edited in coffee shops. However looking at the contributions of the other users I appear linked to, there is nothing to suggest we are the same person. Details: * NormaBates123 - edited 1 page about the director Ben Foster. * SravaniChalla - edited multiple articles, mostly people or companies, including a bunch of photographers / film people. Talk pages shows many items of their content were images which were deleted for copyright issues. * Kar.sunder - created one page which was deleted as advertising. My own account has 3 main patterns of usage, making it different from the others: * Translating foreign articles into English, in order to improve my skills in those languages while learning new topics, e.g. sections of Henry IV of Castile. * Adding new pages or updating them when I see that Wikipedia doesn't know enough about a topic that interested me, e.g. Blackbox novel; * Hitting "random page" looking for articles that I can improve while learning about an interesting new topic, e.g. Pontefract Hermitage. Investigation link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Kspellskarthik/Archive#Clerk.2C_CheckUser.2C_and.2For_patrolling_admin_comments_2 The blocking administrator was Bbb23. I have been unable to contact them as their talk page says they are "on a break for an undetermined length of time and will not be responding to any posts".

Decline reason:

Procedural decline rather than a decline on the merits. You have not actually outright denied the allegations. Note also that checkuser evidence does not solely depend on IP addresses. We know you, NormaBates123 (talk · contribs), SravaniChalla (talk · contribs), and Kar.sunder (talk · contribs) have all used the same computer. You'll want to address that in your next unblock request. Yamla (talk) 13:12, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Beth Holmes 1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

2nd attempt at an unblock request. My first one was declined by Yamla. ===Yamla's response from last time=== Procedural decline rather than a decline on the merits. You have not actually outright denied the allegations. Note also that checkuser evidence does not solely depend on IP addresses. We know you, NormaBates123 (talk · contribs), SravaniChalla (talk · contribs), and Kar.sunder (talk · contribs) have all used the same computer. You'll want to address that in your next unblock request. ===Additional details to address Yamla's points=== I am denying the allegations. I am not a sockpuppet. Regarding the other users having used the same computer as me: I have never heard of those users before this incident. Here are the computers I have used over the years since I started editing Wikipedia: #public computers in 2 internet cafes #public computers in 2 public libraries #A series of 3 laptops and 2 desktops provided by my employer. Each time I was given an upgrade, the previous lower-spec machines were put back into a pool for anyone who needed a spare computer, e.g. loaned to interns or other people who were having their main computers repaired. #A few different personal laptops and mobile devices that I sold or gave after upgrading them. I can't remember which of those I actually edited Wikipedia from, but there have been multiple opportunities for other people to use those same computers after me. Further evidence that I am not a sockpuppet: Here is my Linkedin account, where I'd be willing to reply to messages about this to show that I am not a figment of Kspellskarthik's imagination https://www.linkedin.com/in/beth-holmes-a2844611/?ppe=1 ===Details I put last time=== My account was blocked because it was thought to be a sockpuppet of the user Kspellskarthik. According to the sockpuppet investigation, the evidence came from CheckUser saying that my account was confirmed to be linked to 3 others and likely to Kspellskarthik. It also said: "The accounts in the archives and the accounts listed below often use servers that hide their true locations." I do not have access to the CheckUser data. However my hypothesis is because I work for a big company and sometimes edit while VPN'd to their servers, it makes my IP address look like these other people's. Otherwise it may be because I have sometimes edited in coffee shops. Looking at the contributions of the other users I appear linked to, there is nothing to suggest we are the same person. Details: #NormaBates123 - edited 1 page about the director Ben Foster. #SravaniChalla - edited multiple articles, mostly people or companies, including a bunch of photographers / film people. Talk pages shows many items of their content were images which were deleted for copyright issues. #Kar.sunder - created one page which was deleted as advertising. My own account has 3 main patterns of usage, making it different from the others: #Translating foreign articles into English, in order to improve my skills in those languages while learning new topics, e.g. sections of Henry IV of Castile. #Adding new pages or updating them when I see that Wikipedia doesn't know enough about a topic that interested me, e.g. Blackbox novel; #Hitting "random page" looking for articles that I can improve while learning about an interesting new topic, e.g. Pontefract Hermitage. Investigation link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Kspellskarthik/Archive#Clerk.2C_CheckUser.2C_and.2For_patrolling_admin_comments_2 The blocking administrator was Bbb23. I have been unable to contact them as their talk page says they are "on a break for an undetermined length of time and will not be responding to any posts". 2A02:C7F:1E01:5100:AC6A:8DF0:30F5:5B55 (talk) 17:16, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please request an unblock only from your account, not using an IPs, you've been told this earlier on but all unblock requests are only from IPs. Continuing to do so will result in this page being semi-protected and the requests will not be addressed. —SpacemanSpiff 06:26, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Beth Holmes 1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My account was blocked because it was thought to be a sockpuppet of the user Kspellskarthik. This is my 3rd attempt to get the unblock-request process right. ===Addressing failed attempt 2=== The previous attempt was declined because I was using my IP address instead of logging in from my account. That was because I had tried logging in on the other pages which failed because of being blocked, so I assumed my own talk page would have the same problem. People had left me that instruction where I'd asked for help on their talk pages, but I hadn't received any notifications of their replies and (stupidly) didn't check. I realise this has caused unnecessary hassle for the administrators and apologise for that. Hopefully there won't need to be more attempts after this one. ===Yamla's response to Attempt 1=== Procedural decline rather than a decline on the merits. You have not actually outright denied the allegations. Note also that checkuser evidence does not solely depend on IP addresses. We know you, NormaBates123 (talk · contribs), SravaniChalla (talk · contribs), and Kar.sunder (talk · contribs) have all used the same computer. You'll want to address that in your next unblock request. ===Additional details to address Yamla's points=== I am denying the allegations. I am not a sockpuppet. Regarding the other users having used the same computer as me: I have never heard of those users before this incident. Here are the computers I have used over the years since I started editing Wikipedia: #public computers in 2 internet cafes #public computers in 2 public libraries #A series of 3 laptops and 2 desktops provided by my employer. Each time I was given an upgrade, the previous lower-spec machines were put back into a pool for anyone who needed a spare computer, e.g. loaned to interns or other people who were having their main computers repaired. #A few different personal laptops and mobile devices that I sold or gave after upgrading them. I can't remember which of those I actually edited Wikipedia from, but there have been multiple opportunities for other people to use those same computers after me. Further evidence that I am not a sockpuppet: Here is my Linkedin account, where I'd be willing to reply to messages about this to show that I am not a figment of Kspellskarthik's imagination https://www.linkedin.com/in/beth-holmes-a2844611/?ppe=1 ===Details from Attempt 1=== My account was blocked because it was thought to be a sockpuppet of the user Kspellskarthik. According to the sockpuppet investigation, the evidence came from CheckUser saying that my account was confirmed to be linked to 3 others and likely to Kspellskarthik. It also said: "The accounts in the archives and the accounts listed below often use servers that hide their true locations." I do not have access to the CheckUser data. However my hypothesis is because I work for a big company and sometimes edit while VPN'd to their servers, it makes my IP address look like these other people's. Otherwise it may be because I have sometimes edited in coffee shops. Looking at the contributions of the other users I appear linked to, there is nothing to suggest we are the same person. Details: #NormaBates123 - edited 1 page about the director Ben Foster. #SravaniChalla - edited multiple articles, mostly people or companies, including a bunch of photographers / film people. Talk pages shows many items of their content were images which were deleted for copyright issues. #Kar.sunder - created one page which was deleted as advertising. My own account has 3 main patterns of usage, making it different from the others: #Translating foreign articles into English, in order to improve my skills in those languages while learning new topics, e.g. sections of Henry IV of Castile. #Adding new pages or updating them when I see that Wikipedia doesn't know enough about a topic that interested me, e.g. Blackbox novel; #Hitting "random page" looking for articles that I can improve while learning about an interesting new topic, e.g. Pontefract Hermitage. Investigation link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Kspellskarthik/Archive#Clerk.2C_CheckUser.2C_and.2For_patrolling_admin_comments_2 The blocking administrator was Bbb23. I have been unable to contact them as their talk page says they are "on a break for an undetermined length of time and will not be responding to any posts". Beth Holmes 1 (talk) 11:56, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks and no admin has decided to weigh in. You are welcome to request another unblock, but if you do so, please rewrite your request. Yamla (talk) 01:04, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • Only a CheckUser can perform this unblock or authorise us to do so. Bbb23 has edited as recently as 21 August. Perhaps you could try emailing them. AFAICS, your email has not been disabled. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:14, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • Thanks. I have tried mailing them.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Beth_Holmes_1&oldid=1088000678"