User talk:Bestagon
If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~
Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.
Thank you!
Rust revision[edit]
Hi Bestagon, you gotta give me time to type the reason. You reverted the changes in like half a second.
The reason I removed the reference is because it's misrepresenting the source. The source says that no one from the LA Local (44) was on the set. As it was shot in New Mexico, it's likely that union members would be sourced from the New Mexico local (480).
The prop master may or may not be a member of the union, but at this stage we don't know one way or the other. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.96.210.208 (talk) 03:55, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
- Hello! As the message on your talk page stated, it is preferable if you use an edit summary to explain your revision--without one it is difficult to tell if the revision was for a good reason or not. In response to your claim, the article does say "there was no union prop master on set the night" [1], but you are correct that it is ambiguous in the article, so I'll definitely leave that for people to hash out at the article/its talk page. Again, using an edit summary to explain the change in the future would definitely help avoid some of this! Thanks! Bestagon ⬡ 04:04, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
- ^ Fernández, Alexia (October 22, 2021). "Rust Set Didn't Have a Union Prop Master Working on Day of Alec Baldwin Incident, Says Union". People. Retrieved October 27, 2021.
East Richmond edit[edit]
Hello, I was wondering why you reverted my recent change about Belgrave and Lilydale trains not stopping at East Richmond. I had a source to put in, but it was reverted before I could. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.185.83.34 (talk) 05:09, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
- Hello, your edit didn't include the citation, and a word like "notorious" tips me off that you may have been using original research. If you are adequately able to source the edit, by all means, include it! Please just make sure to also adhere to a neutral point of view. Thanks! Bestagon ⬡ 05:11, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Oh, okay. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.201.128.114 (talk) 07:36, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]
 | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Kirsten Engel Vandalism[edit]
Vanadlism keeps occuring on the Kirsten Engel page. 128.194.2.158 (talk) 15:47, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
Standard notice[edit]
 | This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. |
Dr.Pinsky (talk) 15:38, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
"3c7" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]
The redirect 3c7 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 22 § 3c7 until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 06:26, 22 January 2024 (UTC)