User talk:Bdshahab

Blocked

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing for Vandalism. If you feel this block is unjustified, you may contest it by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 18:19, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bdshahab (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am new comer but I still try to submit my article to wikipedia. However, I use that standard way not force one like you! Now act like a wiseman and unblock me (Bdshahab)

Decline reason:

Let me summarize the situation:

You created a new page named Why learing programming is hard?, which is fine by itself.
Another editor marked the page for removal as they (correctly, i might add) believed it didn't meet the inclusion criteria on Wikipedia.
You removed the proposed deletion template from the page (Which is fine), so the editor who marked it for deletion placed an Article's for deletion template instead. (Which is standard fare for article deletions - proposed deletion is a lightweight process that doesn't require discussion to remove an article. If someone objects to the removal a standard article's for deletion discussion is started.)
You remove the AFD template using the comment "Don't you understand this is free encyclopedia? What is mean freedom? I'm sorry for you and our world."
I restore the AFD template and subsequently you vandalise Matty.007 user and talk pages several times. Afterwards you vandalize Sjö's user page.
Due to the above vandalism your account is blocked, to which your first response is this text.
The day after the above unblock request is posted on my own talk page.

Based on the above i see no indication you understand why your account has been blocked, nor any indication the same behavioural pattern won't resume after an unblock. If your response to another editors edits are vandalism and personal attacks i doubt unblocking the account will benefit Wikipedia as a whole. Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 07:47, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bdshahab (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Do not refer to Excirial. He's bulling me. I want to help wikipedia to have real free encyclopedia.

Decline reason:

You have never made a constructive edit. At best, your editing has been attempts to use Wikipedia as a blog, and at worst it has been deliberate vandalism and personal attacks. Nothing whatever suggests that unblocking you would benefit the project. You should have been blocked long ago. In addition, since you have abused talk page access while blocked, that access will be removed. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 09:41, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If you have not already done so, I suggest that you read my comments at User talk:5.223.184.21. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:00, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]