User talk:BahrdozsBulafka
BahrdozsBulafka, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]
|
Hi BahrdozsBulafka! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 31 March 2019 (UTC) |
April 2020[edit]
Hello, I'm JavaHurricane. I wanted to let you know that one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Shayan Italia— has been undone because it appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thank you. JavaHurricane 11:32, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
- Ignore this message, mistake on my part due to a mixup of diffs. I was trying to revert the promotional additions using HG, but apparently you edited before I reverted, and the conflict caused incorrect reverts. Sorry! JavaHurricane 11:46, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
- @JavaHurricane: Cool, no worries! It's still a lotta promotion though... BahrdozsBulafka (talk) 16:48, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Permanent Black for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Permanent Black is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Permanent Black until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 09:13, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]
Hello, BahrdozsBulafka
Thank you for creating Dualist Inquiry.
User:MrClog, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
"He has been credit with pioneering the independent music scene in the country." was not supported by the cited reference, who calls him a "key name", which is not necessarily the same. Also, I moved the page to "Dualist Inquiry" per WP:COMMONNAME.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MrClog}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
MrClog (talk) 12:14, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for your note, MrClog. You're right. Can we rephrase it to ..."is considered to be among the pioneers of independent music in the country's nascent indie music scene" - that should hold and can be easily supported by the quality sources...but it's okay if you think otherwise BahrdozsBulafka (talk) 12:43, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- I would say that "
According to Megha Roy, Dualist Inquiry is considered a key name in the independent music scene in India.
" would be a good way of phrasing it. --MrClog (talk) 12:56, 6 May 2020 (UTC)- OK noted MrClog, thanks! BahrdozsBulafka (talk) 12:59, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- I would say that "
- Thanks for your note, MrClog. You're right. Can we rephrase it to ..."is considered to be among the pioneers of independent music in the country's nascent indie music scene" - that should hold and can be easily supported by the quality sources...but it's okay if you think otherwise BahrdozsBulafka (talk) 12:43, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
May 2020[edit]
Hello BahrdozsBulafka. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:BahrdozsBulafka. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=BahrdozsBulafka|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. - FitIndia Talk Commons 18:25, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
- Hello Fitindia, thanks for your message. Although I'm not sure which of my contributions may have led you to this suspicion (as the articles I have created vary enormously and reflect my own interests in those topics: architects, book publishers, economist, classical dancer etc.), for Wikimedia's record, I can openly state that I am not a paid advocate for anyone, neither have been in the past, and nor will be in the future... Regards, BahrdozsBulafka (talk) 10:17, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, I have been editing Wikipedia on and off for the past decade, but was not registered.. Regards, BahrdozsBulafka (talk) 09:23, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Shagun Butani for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shagun Butani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shagun Butani until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CNMall41 (talk) 06:47, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Asim Waqif[edit]
Hello! Your submission of Asim Waqif at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! What a pro (talk, contribs) 08:03, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
New message from Narutolovehinata5[edit]
Message added 08:17, 28 June 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 08:17, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]
 | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Speedy deletion nomination of Anoop Nautiyal[edit]
Hello BahrdozsBulafka,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Anoop Nautiyal for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Padavalam🌂 ► 10:39, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)