User talk:Aristolaos

AfD nomination of Holotes[edit]

I have nominated Holotes, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holotes. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TN‑X-Man 19:30, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have made some addition about "Parts" etc. I am planning to make it an article of ten times bigger.
I have all this article in another language that requires translation and adaptation (summary).
You see it is going to be a long article; if I use a lot of description, as you probably want, (with explanations, verbs, a lot of examples etc) it will become about 500 hundred times bigger, like the one I now have

Speedy deletion of "Alexander Dictionary of English Idioms"[edit]

A page you created, Alexander Dictionary of English Idioms, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is obvious advertising or promotional material.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. ukexpat (talk) 17:17, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Alexander Dictionary of English Idioms[edit]

A tag has been placed on Alexander Dictionary of English Idioms, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. ukexpat (talk) 17:27, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Alexander Dictionary of English Idioms, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. ukexpat (talk) 17:28, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Alexander Dictionary of English Idioms[edit]

A tag has been placed on Alexander Dictionary of English Idioms, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. ukexpat (talk) 18:24, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Alexander Dictionary of English Idioms. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. ukexpat (talk) 18:25, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Alexander Dictionary of English Idioms. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ukexpat (talk) 18:42, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Customer's Equity"[edit]

A page you created, Customer's Equity, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it has no content, other than external links, categories, "see also" sections, rephrasing of the title, and/or chat-like comments.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Leujohn ^(talk) 13:48, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Customer's Equity[edit]

A tag has been placed on Customer's Equity, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. ukexpat (talk) 15:03, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009[edit]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did with Customer's Equity, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ukexpat (talk) 15:04, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Customer's Equity[edit]

Couple of points: First, how is this any different from Customer equity? Should Customer's Equity not be redirected to Customer equity. Second, please user edit summaries. Thanks. – ukexpat (talk) 15:52, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You might be interested in a discussion at WikiProject Economics on Customer's Equity. Thanks, --Patrick (talk) 16:50, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message -- so are you saying that this is all your original research? – ukexpat (talk) 22:44, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, as you forgot on your recent edit to Customer's Equity. Thank you. ukexpat (talk) 18:59, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

etymology[edit]

Please stop adding "(from the Greek XXX)" to the lead sentence of articles. Wikipedia is an encyclopeadia not an etymological dictionary (we concentrate on the topic, not the word) and WP:LEAD requires the lead sentence to define or explain the topic, not on the origins of the word. If the etymology of a word is particularly noteworthy, it can be mentioned in the article, but the lead sentence is too prominent for such a minor aspect of a topic. Colin°^Talk 14:17, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Especially giving the new Greek pronunciation is misleading. The origin is not from modern Greek, but form classical Greek. −Woodstone (talk) 09:26, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want to sound harsh or insulting, but.. er.. you seem to have no clue on Ancient Greek Phonetics or the correct use of IPA in both Modern and Ancient Greek, so all your etymology- and phonetics-related edits have done much more harm than good and need to be reverted. Besides, as Woodstone said above, Wikipedia is not an etymological dictionary, especially in the case of technical terms from Physics and Biology. --Omnipaedista (talk) 17:32, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Dictionary of idioms has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Kingpin13 (talk) 11:57, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Dictionary of idioms. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Until It Sleeps 12:19, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Dictionary of idioms. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Until It Sleeps 12:20, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Interalex.org[edit]

A tag has been placed on Interalex.org requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 18:02, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bilingual Idiom Dictionary[edit]

A tag has been placed on Bilingual Idiom Dictionary requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Thorncrag 01:39, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alexander Language Schools International for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alexander Language Schools International is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Language Schools International until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — Mr. Stradivarius ^♫ 04:26, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Alexander Language Schools International[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Alexander Language Schools International, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ukexpat (talk) 16:32, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chalkidiki Greek for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chalkidiki Greek is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chalkidiki Greek until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dennis Brown - 2¢ - © - @ - Join WER 23:34, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Aristolaos/Bilingual Dictionary of Idioms[edit]

User:Aristolaos/Bilingual Dictionary of Idioms, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Aristolaos/Bilingual Dictionary of Idioms and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Aristolaos/Bilingual Dictionary of Idioms during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 23:38, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Question about copyright[edit]

Hi. :) Somebody noticed that the content you added to Idiom dictionary here was the same or almost the same as the content placed here. It's difficult to determine which came first, and we have a little bit of dilemma in that we can't accept content that was previously published elsewhere on the internet without getting verification that it is compatibly licensed with our site. Obviously, we want to respect people's copyright.

Given your edit history, I suspect you authored the content on both pages, but it would be very helpful in resolving this problem if you can affirm which came first or that you are an authorized agent of that site. There are a couple of relatively easy ways to do this. First, you could simply make a note on that page of the website indicating that either copyright is owned by Wikipedia editor Aristolaos (which would clarify that you were authorized to publish it here as well) or add the following license statement:

The text of this webpage is available for modification and reuse under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License and the GNU Free Documentation License (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts).

If you don't want to do that, you could send an email from an email address clearly associated with that website to permissions-enwikimedia.org explaining that you are an authorized agent of the website where the content appears and either confirming that you had placed it on Wikipedia first (you are welcome to reuse content you add to Wikipedia anywhere you want, although if you add in changes by others you do have to follow the terms of the license) or (if it was first on your website) that you are the copyright owner and consent to publication under the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License and the GNU Free Documentation License (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover tests, or back-cover texts).

I apologize for the complexity, but, again, it's important to us to protect the copyrights of others, so we try to make sure that any content we have that is also posted elsewhere is documented. If you're not able to help with this, we may need to consider whether we can retain the text, just to be safe.

If you have any questions about this, please drop by my talk page (you can find it at User talk:Moonriddengirl) and let me know. If you choose to clarify by changing the website, can you please either let me know at my talk page or leave a note at Talk:Idiom dictionary? It would be very much appreciated. :) Thanks! --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 12:20, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Yerakini2.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Yerakini2.png, which you've attributed to http://www.interalex.net/2011/01/yerakini-gerakini-grece-info.html. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 16:59, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Yerakini Beach Sunset.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Yerakini Beach Sunset.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:27, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lazarus Ch. Sarantoglou[edit]

The article Lazarus Ch. Sarantoglou has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No Google results or evidence that this person existed.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Everymorning talk to me 17:30, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 25[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lazarus Ch. Sarantoglou, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Contractor. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:01, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 28[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Yerakini

added links pointing to Environment, Thebes, Hermione, Aegean, KTEL and Limni

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 4[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yerakini, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Limni. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 26[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yerakini, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Limni. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:En-Chalkidiki1.ogg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:En-Chalkidiki1.ogg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 23:42, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Yerakini, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.
"Ask someone" is not a wp:RS. Jim1138 (talk) 05:49, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Chalkidiki in Brief[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Chalkidiki in Brief. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Chalkidiki. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Chalkidiki – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Ben Ben (talk) 22:18, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alexander Language Schools[edit]

The article Alexander Language Schools has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

insufficient notability. The article contains no reliable, third-party sources that attest to the topic's notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Constantine ✍ 16:24, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alexander Language Schools.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Alexander Language Schools.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:52, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]