User talk:Apokaradokia

May 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Eniola Aluko, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 14:40, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Eniola Aluko, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:52, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Eniola Aluko, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:09, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Eniola Aluko. Materialscientist (talk) 23:37, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Page protected[edit]

Hello. As you've continued to make largely unsourced changed to the article, it has now protected so you cannot edit it. From the nature of your edits, it looks like you may have a WP:Conflict of interest with the subject, so please familiarise yourself with the this guideline. If you believe there inaccuracies in the article that need correcting, please highlight them on the talk page, providing sources that back up the differing information you wish to insert. Cheers, Number 5 7 00:02, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Apokaradokia. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 07:03, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020[edit]

Your recent edits to Talk:Eniola Aluko could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. Please reply and clarify your intentions and do not edit until you do so. Cabayi (talk) 15:31, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it is suspected that it has been compromised. If your account is locked, please contact ca

wikimedia.org. Otherwise, if you are able to confirm that you are the user who created this account, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section), then add this below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=your reason here ~~~~}}.Cabayi (talk) 15:35, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If your account has been used by your assistant as you state in this edit - Special:Diff/958854657 - we can no longer be sure who is in control of your account. Cabayi (talk) 15:42, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Negative editing[edit]

This Wikipedia page is subject to repeated negative editing despite repeated attempts to add facts and context with reliable sources. Where reliable sources are provided to changes, there are users deliberately reverting to the initial negative copy preventing the public from wider facts. This page will be the subject of legal review. Apokaradokia (talk) 17:02, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.