User talk:Apemonkey1

There are no non monkey apes!

Its good to see wiki is as corrupt and biased more than ever, where friends views over rule the wiki rules (Which never applied to admins).

Right to Bear Arms[edit]

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

If you dont like it, you are free to leave the country!

February 2019[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Article talk pages are for discussing improvements to their associated articles, not for general discussion of the articles' topics. Your recent additions to Talk:International Olympic Committee, Talk:Hannah Mouncey, Talk:Shooting of Daniel Shaver and Talk:Concealed carry are more of what earned you your recent block. If you continue, you will be blocked again. While blocks are normally escalating in nature (getting progressively longer), the blocking admin always has the option of blocking you indefinitely as an editor who is not here to build an encyclopedia. SummerPhD^v2.0 23:26, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 23:52, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Apemonkey1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Blocked for stating a man is man? (What now will wiki change all the other pages to meet this persons standard of its not acceptable to define xy as male? or xx as female? I bet It will not thus proving this block is based on discrimination by a person being politically correct while ignore truth, facts and science! Will it now state the bible is true and just as valid as evolution? Thats a far easier argument to make than claiming a xy man can not be called a man!) I assume the ban is not about asking how the AFL could stop this man from playing when its against discrimination laws? This abuse of power by a person who is either political correctness triggered (or who knows what else) is just absurd! How is editing out the fact a man is man not disruptive? I use to think wiki was about facts not fairy tales! Now its about admin doing what the other admins tell them to do, ignoring the Wiki Rules!Apemonkey1 (talk) 06:41, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Does not address reason for block. Yunshui ^雲 _水 09:00, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As you are using this page to attack others and to violate WP:OUTING policy, I have removed your ability to edit here too. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:25, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]