So long and thanks for all the fish[edit]

I have been banned because I share interests with a person called Pass The Method,and because I misspelled a word,which he also does,apparently.

The other "evidence" of my being the user is that I did't edit anything,which is impossible when wild camping.

This is me saying the accusations are not correct or true at all,and I am saddened by them.

In case the *truth* does not out,and the ban not overturned:

Goodbye, I enjoyed my three months here. :) Salam.

Welcome![edit]

Hi, AnarchoGhost. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Alfietucker (talk) 18:01, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

AnarchoGhost, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Hi AnarchoGhost! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! TheOriginalSoni (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:08, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Block notice[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for the inappropriate use of multiple accounts. Per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pass a Method, I find it very likely that this account was used as a failed attempt at a clean start. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 18:15, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AnarchoGhost (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Ponyo is right in one regard, I did make a account called AhimsaGhost when I thought I forget my log in,but I remembered it and henceforth used my first Account,anarchoghost. I am not a sockpuppet of this pass the method user. I'm sorry I didn't delete the other account, I thought it would be okay if I didn't,as I didn't know how anyway. This is far too harsh for forgetting my log in, and To be accused of being a sockpuppet is hurtful.Please unblock me, As I really am trying to help out on Wikipedia. *edit* Looked at the "evidence" I'm banned because of three interests being the same as some other banned guy?! And because I used the wrong verson of the word grammar for the UK? This is such a mistake,a big one, really really have got it wrong. I only been on Wikipedia for three months and know I'm banned for life because I share interests with other people! Really unfair... :( I'm state outright that the fact is I'm not "pass the method" That's just how it is.I leave it up to you,Namaste.Oh, and there reason I haven't been on is because I was camping with no internet acess,and our laptop doesn't work .I only saw this because I wanted info on a topic before bed and happened to be logged in on my girlfriends phone. Sorry I went camping...didn't know my being offline woul be used against me! AnarchoGhost (talk) 02:07, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

On top of the evidence being convincing, you really aren't making much sense. Try not to rant and ramble next time. — Daniel Case (talk) 16:26, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AnarchoGhost (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorry, I was very tired and upset about being accused. So what do I have to do to convince you? I layed out the facts: That I am not Pass the method. And the evidence was vague. On top of that my page clearly says I'm a green Anarchist,A Buddhist and a Pacifist, none of with Pass the user appears to be. No doubt it will just perceived as a very good fake, but I will go one step further and revel that I am *redacted* You can google me, and I'm sure you'll find a facebook page and a few political things I've been involved with. So hopefully this shows I'm not pass the user and am a real and genuine person, and not his sock puppet,as I am no-one's sockpuppet,and haven't done anything wrong. AnarchoGhost (talk) 13:12, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The evidence shown here seems convincing, I agree with the other admins. Unblock request denied. Chillum ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 02:34, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AnarchoGhost (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It doesn't matter how convincing it is is, the fact is a mistake has been made,and I am not pass the method,not a sock puppet or guilty of any of the claims,I joined Wikipedia to try and help, and it's a shame he has the same pages watched as I do,I'm interested in Lee Rigby as there was a lot of misinformation floating around,and I watched the Islam page to watch out for Islamophobes vandelisng it. I have stated the facts,and will work on other proejcts I am involved with, I will. Be removing the Infomation I posted about my name etc. Happy editing,shame this happened and people got it all wrong. :) AnarchoGhost (talk) 23:17, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I agree that there are too many "coincidences" to write this off as a case of "we happen to have an interest in the same subject areas." The creation date of this account along with this diff in which you accidentally carry over your previous service award to your new account. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 19:52, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AnarchoGhost (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was going to leave it, but like an itch,As seen by my help request, I didn't know what I was doing with the service award.My new account ,I don't understand,this is my only and first account? Again, in keeping with the truth and facts, these admins have made a mistake,that's truly how it is,the question is do you want to continue to be wrong, or just accept your mistake and unban me? The funny thing is,while I am trying to correct this, Pass the Method,who no-one has ever said appealed his bans has probably made another account.While I have to pay for something he has done...I don't know why I bother, because nothing I can say is convincing anyone, so what's the point in this show trial?Clearly an abuse of power because admins are willing to accuse new editors and not care about getting it wrong and back each other up. AnarchoGhost (talk) 22:08, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I agree with the comments and decision made on this page by several other uninvolved admins. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 14:40, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.