User talk:Amitized

February 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Sambit Patra, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 06:49, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of National Council of Hindu Temples

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on National Council of Hindu Temples requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Daiyusha (talk) 16:36, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Contesting speedy deletion

Added this page because NCHTUK is a 50 year old organization that connects over 200 temples across UK which is notable considering the Indian diaspora in the UK. Amitized (talk) 18:35, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Contesting speedy deletion

Added this page because NCHTUK is a 50 year old organization that connects over 200 temples across UK which is notable considering the Indian diaspora in the UK. Amitized (talk) 18:38, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Amitized! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing!  samee  converse  10:00, 27 March 2019 (UTC) Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Amitized, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Institute of Management Accountants and Education in India have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:16, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for guiding Diana

Thanks for guiding me on this Diana. I look forward to fixing the issues on these and further contributing to Wikipedia... Thanks again Amitized (talk) 13:05, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Your edits on Azam Khan

Hi Amitized, regarding this edit that you made on Azam Khan OPINDIA is not a reliable source, it is a BJP propaganda site,Accordingly I have removed poorly sourced negative content. Please read WP:BLP and understand about the expectation on the quality of sources while editing a BLP. --DBigXrayᗙ 10:33, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Ok thanks for sharing your thoughts, will revisit the edit with a high quality source Amitized (talk) 12:38, 3 October 2019 (UTC)Amitized

Nomination of Karan Acharya for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Karan Acharya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karan Acharya (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hitro talk 05:58, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions alert for India, Pakistan and Afghanistan

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Note that North East Delhi riots is one of the many articles covered by these sanctions. Doug Weller talk 17:51, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ashwini Kumar Upadhaya

Hello Amitized,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ashwini Kumar Upadhaya for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Padavalam🌂  ►  07:08, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nilesh Nilkanth Oak

The article Nilesh Nilkanth Oak has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacks notability. Note that the "nominated for the Lakatos Award" claims are pure puffery, as anyone can "nominate" any book for the award[1], it's not as if the book made a shortlist of 5 or so nominees.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 08:47, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Nilesh Nilkanth Oak moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Nilesh Nilkanth Oak, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CUPIDICAE💕 08:20, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Shaheen bhatt for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shaheen bhatt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaheen bhatt until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DMySon (talk) 12:48, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

NPOV and reliable sources

I've removed some parts of your recent addition to RSS. Text like The RSS encourages thinking and sharing of thoughts is not only POV but also quite unencyclopedic in nature. The source you used had nothing at all to support such additions. Hemantha (talk) 09:15, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Agree, I went about in writing flow. Will be careful in the future. Amitized (talk) 09:55, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

To illustrate the problem of using sub-standard sources, see your edits to multiple articles where you added text explicitly promoting some completely non-notable movie. With WP:AGF, I can see how you might've thought it appropriate when you read it in news and went about adding it to different articles you thought relevant, but that kind of writing and the use of such sources gives the appearance of WP:UPE and/or WP:COI. Hemantha (talk) 03:49, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Okay, I get it though the movie with several notable artists being a part of it made me think it would be relevant in those encyclopedic contexts. Amitized (talk) 12:40, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Notification for your reference

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

I saw that the last notice of Discretionary sanctions you received was in 2020; so this is to remind you and also for this edit at Persecution_of_Hindus. Hemantha (talk) 09:27, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Please go through the blue links in the above notice and read them carefully. In this edit, you added text that "the numbers have doubled after 2014 election of Narendra Modi". But News18 said only that "Subscription Nearly Doubles", while HT gave accurate numbers, showing a 40%-65% growth (as a slight aside, note how unreliable News18 is). Please exercise more care to not introduce such exaggerations or inaccuracies anywhere in Wikipedia, but especially so in the dispute-prone articles you've chosen to edit. Hemantha (talk) 13:22, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Yes, I found the second source later and while I added the citation, missed out on editing the numbers. Amitized (talk) 04:04, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Panjabiyat AfD

I've nominated it on your behalf. Please follow all the three steps outlined at WP:AFDHOWTO next time. Hemantha (talk) 02:49, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Thank you @Hemantha will keep the process in mind when doing it again. Amitized (talk) 04:02, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

May 2022

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on Jignesh Mevani. Thank you. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 07:56, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for feedback, will do and revise my words. Amitized (talk) 08:41, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Priya Lakhani moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Priya Lakhani, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 08:48, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

I found notable sources for this one, should I submit for review and then continue to work on the article or should I develop it in draftspace itself and submit for review later? What do you suggest @HitroMilanese Amitized (talk) 06:36, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

My suggestion would be to work on the draft and submit it after the draft is completely developed. Regards. Hitro talk 18:17, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Ok, will do. Thank you. Amitized (talk) 03:34, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Isha Ambani (May 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hatchens was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Isha Ambani and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Isha Ambani, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hatchens (talk) 08:41, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Amitized! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hatchens (talk) 08:41, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Madhabi Puri Buch for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Madhabi Puri Buch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madhabi Puri Buch until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Hatchens (talk) 08:48, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Ashwini Upadhyay for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ashwini Upadhyay is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashwini Upadhyay until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Hatchens (talk) 08:51, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Karan Acharya for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Karan Acharya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karan Acharya (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Hatchens (talk) 08:56, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

G23 leaders moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, G23 leaders, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hatchens (talk) 09:01, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Amitized

Thank you for creating Renu Sud Karnad.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 02:06, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for your kind words @North8000, look forward to collaborating and contributing with you in a more meaningful way. Amitized (talk) 03:33, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Nilesh Nilkanth Oak

Hello, Amitized. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nilesh Nilkanth Oak, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:01, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Nilesh Nilkanth Oak

Hello, Amitized. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nilesh Nilkanth Oak".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:26, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Noted 182.75.222.178 (talk) 08:58, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Priya Lakhani

Hello, Amitized. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Priya Lakhani, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:28, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:G23 leaders

Hello, Amitized. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:G23 leaders, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:35, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Isha Ambani

Hello, Amitized. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Isha Ambani, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:55, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Priya Lakhani

Hello, Amitized. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Priya Lakhani".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 10:00, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Isha Ambani

Hello, Amitized. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Isha Ambani".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:54, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:G23 leaders

Hello, Amitized. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "G23 leaders".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 09:02, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)