User talk:Americanatheart

Hello, Americanatheart, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Happy editing! SwisterTwister talk 19:33, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Pattern of changes / deletions[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Elsa Pataky, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dolohov (talk • contribs) 02:04, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Darby_(name), you may be blocked from editing.

If it is helpful to label those people as "American" who are (and I believe that it is), it is logically unhelpful to remove the label "Canadian" from those who are. You have a pattern of edits to Wikipedia, only to adjust description of nationality, often removing information or nuance. This does not appear to me to be productive or useful to Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, and has the appearance of attempting to exert a political point of view on a series of articles. At least, it would be helpful if your edits were marked with a description, if not a reason for the change. Dolohov (talk) 02:21, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2012[edit]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as seen in Wentworth Miller, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You should reflect on why you are editing Wikipedia, considering your username and your attempts to alter BLP information to make people appear more American. Taroaldo (talk) 20:06, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! It would be appreciated if you could please ensure your edits are constructive and neutral. Their substance should be summarised in the edit summaries. Thanks. -- Trevj (talk) 00:39, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Alice Evans, you may be blocked from editing. -- Trevj (talk) 01:41, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Adrian Pasdar, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- Trevj (talk) 08:10, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry we've had to block you[edit]

… but multiple editors have tried to reason with you about this odd, unhelpful editing pattern of yours and it's been to no effect.

We'd love to have your constructive help in building our encyclopaedia when you're ready to work with us.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing, as you did at Cicely (disambiguation). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 21:23, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for resuming the disruptive editing that led to your previous block. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 17:33, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]