User talk:Aldux/Archive 8

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Shqipity-doo[edit]

I was looking at the history of some Albanian articles in light of the ZoguShqiptar700 uprising and I happened to notice some similar-flavored edits from back in the day.

Albanau (talk · contribs) made virtually the same edits back in June 2005

And then there were some others

Maybe you'd have a better idea of whether these are the same person or just coincidental. — CharlotteWebb 13:08, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

LOL, you evidently are not familiar with how deep these name edit wars go. See the cases of User:Mywayyy, User:Ormands (no userpage) and the entry at WP:LAME.--Euthymios 17:04, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I also believe they're different people, but anyways I requested a checkuser so that all doubts can be rapidly dissipated.--Aldux 17:07, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kaltsa (=sock in Greek) alert[edit]

Ohridan2 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)--Euthymios 17:02, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done.--Aldux 17:08, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bulgaria[edit]

Do you personally dislike my country?! Bulgaria was a great Middle Age power. I can't see in what way france, england or the Frankish Empire exceed Bulgaria in this period. --Gligan 21:59, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have a question, why did Tsar Simeon call himself "Tsar of Bulgarians and Greeks" if the Byzantine Empire was not Greek?--Euthymios 22:01, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Things are very complex here. I do not deny the fact that many contemporaries called the Byzantines "Greeks"; but I think that the major reasons for that are two: 1) Especially for the westerners, who thought that the true Roman Empire was the Holy Roman Empire of the German People it would be confusing and even humiliating to consider the Byzantines as Romans; after all the Pope used to be the face of the Empire for them. 2) People did not have such knowledge in history as today; as the official languaga was Greek, they thought that the population of Byzantium was Greek too. There is also one more reason: the Byzantine historians often called the Bulgarians "Moesians", which has nothing to do with them, but thus they wanted to emphasize that they were insignificant; for the same reason the Bulgarians called the Byzantines Greeks.

If Greece was truely Byzantium, why it did not keep this name? Byzantium I should say sounds glorius and although it was a great enemy of my country, I should admit that this was the most successful, infuential and culturally developped state in Europe throughout the Middle Ages, so if the greeks were Byzantines, I think that they should have kept the name. After all the name "Greece" as a country dates back from 1829; in the Antiquity there was not such state, but such region as is the Middle East for instance today, consisting of numerous independent polisi. --Gligan 09:25, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfA[edit]

Thank you very much for your wondeful comments and support. I appreciate it. Biruitorul 22:15, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WTO[edit]

Re: [1] - I'm afraid Greece and Italy are not participating in the WTO as Hellenic Republic and Italian Republic ([2]). Only around a handful countries use their full names (in reversed order or not). :-) — Instantnood 08:02, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re [3] - By reverting the changes, I'm afraid you could be bringing POV disputes to the template, e.g. Macedonia, Taiwan. — Instantnood 14:51, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but I disagree; these navigational templates are there to make life easier for readers, and should be in accord with the mame of the country articles.--Aldux 14:58, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Nevertheless by following official sources we're avoiding troubles. — Instantnood 16:26, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kaltsef blocked indefinitely[edit]

After having to block Tureg2 (talk · contribs), Tureg3 (talk · contribs), and UOGORTH (talk · contribs) tonight, reverting userpage vandalism, etc. - I have honestly had enough of this user. Therefore, I have decided to be bold and ban him myself. Please let me know if there are any objections. Khoikhoi 10:00, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao, (or should I say Hello)[edit]

Hey you UK based Greek spy! Thanks for reverting my talk-page. I am afraid you have more work with WP:SOCK-ef! ('Kaltsa' literally means 'sock' in Greek!) :-) NikoSilver 12:34, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stop blowing our cover Nikosilver, can't you see there's people suspecting our secret organisation? Miskin 20:46, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello[edit]

I noticed your very helpful work on previous FAC pages. Could you take a look at Ohio Wesleyan University and provide me with some suggestions on how to improve it? I nominated the page 2 days ago. Thank you so much for your time!!! WikiprojectOWU 07:26, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Libyan-Chadian War[edit]

I noticed you added one more headline so the article had two of the same. your version

ciao, --TheFEARgod (Ч) 14:04, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

btw, take a look to the talk page of Chadian-Sudanese conflict--TheFEARgod (Ч) 14:16, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
your changes are Ok, but I still need a revision for the Chadian-Sudanese conflict and Central African War --TheFEARgod (Ч) 21:00, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for handling efficiently this nuisance Factanista[edit]

Also, many thanks you for your editorial improvements of the Andrea Meldolla article!--GiorgioOrsini 01:15, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I left a response to your note on the Andrea Meldolla talk pages.--GiorgioOrsini 03:17, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dealing with Spylab[edit]

Hi Aldux,

Browsing the list of administrators, and being completely new on the Wikipedia, I decided to ask you for help.

Here is the user signed as Spylab which publicly claims that I used so-called sock-puppets in reverting something re-written by him, which he hails as superior to the previous version [4], [5]

Even worse, on the talk pages of the anonymous users who reverted his version of the Croatia subsection he put the {sockpuppet|NovaNova}Spylab tag. See [6] and [7]

I do not think that I should defend myself against baseless accusations and that there must be a way to stop this public slander - which is something I would ask you to do.

Of course, you are more than welcome to check his accusations about the sock-pupperty - and make your findings public. I would appreciate it greatly.

Also, his agressive behavior comes always when he breaks 3RR rule as it can be seen here - twice[8] and again [9], [10], [11]

--NovaNova 23:43, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • User:NovaNova has constantly reverted a section of the neo-Nazism article to an inferior state that did not focus on the actual topic of the article. I comprimised by combining the old and new version of the section, but NovaNova continued the destructive reverts instead of making productive edits. This led to the article being locked. NovaNova has done similar things to the Neo-Nazism in Croatia article, but to a lesser extent (so far). The two anonymous IPs who reverted the neo-Nazism article were obviously NovaNova. They did the exact same revert that NovaNova kept doing, and used the same kind of unique language style in the edit note that NovaNova is known for. I find it amusing that NovaNova would write here that I broke 3RR, since NovaNova has been guilty of the same offence.Spylab 12:53, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Scanderbey[edit]

Why isn't Encyclopedia Britannica a reliable source? --PaxEquilibrium 23:59, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Are you certain it's in it? I've got the modern version, and I remember searching there, without success, for info. on Voisava's ethnicity.--Aldux 00:22, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Check the Encyclopedia Britannica Eleventh Edition. --PaxEquilibrium 17:44, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, it's there, but remember to leave an inline citation when you insert "Serbian". Ciao,--Aldux 18:02, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, since I added it for quite number (n) of times - I don't want to seem like a POV-pusher - so why don't You (who removed it 3-4-5 times) return it Yourself? --PaxEquilibrium 21:02, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Actually I believe I removed only once, at least in the last six months, and I'm not overtly enthusiastic of placing a piece of info that has not been kept by following editions of wikipedia and also does not result to be in Barleti. But I won't oppose you if you do it.--Aldux 13:56, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I added it three times, and You reverted each of those (besides my objections and callings upon EB at the talk page). You're a very, very good-reputation editor, so I'm not going to add it either (it just doesn't seem to be proper to me). --PaxEquilibrium 22:50, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You're free not to believe me, but I controlled carefully, and I only reverted you the last time. I had removed also a duplication of information you made, when you rewrote that her mother was called Voisava and her family, which was already in the previous section. As for the first addition, it was removed by Albanau.--Aldux 23:35, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DYK[edit]

Updated DYK query On December 12, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Islamic Legion, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Hello Aldux - Thanks for creating this article, which BanyanTree nominated - Feel free to self nominate in future, as the vast majority are self nominated. With all your articles on history there are plenty of interesting and unusual things from the old days. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 04:41, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Original Barnstar[edit]

The Original Barnstar
You're not barnstarred nearly enough, and if you keep up at this pace we're going to need to give you another userpage just for the original articles list! Just a shame I can't put a couple more of these on here... Kylu 05:09, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You called me[edit]

"one of the most confrontational and uncivil pov-pushers" I would like to know how you came up with that conclusion about me? I have nothing to do with Greier, he had broken every WP policy that exists, and that's why he was banned when he was still relatevely new to WP. I 've been here since the begining of 2006 (I was editing anonymously before I created an acount), and my problems started when I added the White Nationalist userbox in my userpage. Mitsos 14:27, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maleabroad again[edit]

This person seems to be back; see [12]. Thanks. Imc 21:06, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:Maleabroad is now only editing anonymously...

Incidentally, he signs manually as "[[Maleabroad]]"

Other addressed used prior to block include: 136.159.32.138, .32.162, .32.181, .209.121, .32.127

-- Fullstop 10:40, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ps: as could be expected by his signing as [[Maleabroad]] instead of "[[User:Maleabroad]]", there is now a comment under the article Maleabroad

Following reverts on the articles Hindu and Buddha as an Avatar of Vishnu see also:
Regards, Gouranga(UK) 22:09, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New articles[edit]

Hi! I don't see any additions of new articles in WPHOG! What is going wrong?!! Don't we have any or did you forget your duties?

Seriously now: How are you watching them? Is there a tool, a relevant page etc? Or you just check other users' contributions?

Cheers!--Yannismarou 19:28, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And I was waiting to hear the magic solution! Anyway, good luck with Chad! When you're over with it, Greece will still be waiting for you! Regards!--Yannismarou 20:13, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Move question[edit]

Hello Aldux! Since you helped User:Coppertwig and me with a move some time ago regarding Hellenistic Art, where an original article and a new version had to be somehow combined, can you give me some advice? I created a draft at User_talk:EdJohnston/Tifft_draft whose contents have now been copy-pasted into the main article, by agreement of the editors. This draft is no longer needed. Is it better to leave it around, or delete it? I thought I'd move it, so it is now in User_talk:EdJohnston/Archive4 but now I'm concerned that it's wasting resources. What do you think? There is very little edit history in the draft, and I don't mind at all if it's deleted. EdJohnston 03:36, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at User_talk:EdJohnston.
Thanks for your reply! Deletion is fine. EdJohnston 20:33, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfA[edit]

Thank you for supporting my nomination. I am happy to see that some people believe in me as a potential admin.--Berig 20:08, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

re: Alexander's demands regarding Demosthenes in 335 BC[edit]

Hi Aldux. Happy holidays, I hope you are well. I have a question about the Alexander the Great article. I believe you added the original text, describing Alexander's demands regarding Demosthenes in 335 BC. Based solely on the Plutarch's Phocion, I've recently modified that text and changed the sense of what you wrote, please see Talk:Alexander the Great#Alexander's demands regarding Demosthenes in 335 BC, for details. I would like your opinion on the changes I made. Are there other sources for this incident than Plutarch? Regards Paul August ☎ 20:26, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey[edit]

Please check your email. Khoikhoi 21:51, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah. Well all the email said was, "could you please semi-protect Patras?" :-) Thanks, Khoikhoi 22:09, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry Al, I thought you really were offline when I reverted (saw your contribs had stopped). The rest we will discuss in the said talk. :-) NikoSilver 23:32, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hi[edit]

I just saw your post because of edit conflicts. I am aware of those. But can I simply create articles for Point and email twenty friends to take part in its AfD? This is extremely frustrating and unhelpful, and detrimental to Wikipedia. Have any of those users been warned? Please read the whole AfD again, there are some worrying patterns. None of those users have disclosed how they came across this article. I am finished with that AfD in any case. So, don't worry. What do you think about what happened in the AfD? Cheers! Baristarim 16:02, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Barristarim, I'm happy you've calmed down now. I have no reasons for believing that many of them knew of it through the link to FPS, as I did, as FPS is strongly connected with Greek topics, so it's not so strange many of them came to knew of it. You're entitled to have your suspects, but unless you can substantiate them, and bring serious elements before the WP:AN/I, it's better to keep them for yourself. Cheers,--Aldux 16:21, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re:RfA[edit]

Your proposal honors me greatly. I've answered in my talk page.--Yannismarou 17:58, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tiridates I of Armenia[edit]

What do you think about the balance between primary and secondary sources now?--Eupator 17:17, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Check it out, I have implemented you suggestions.--Eupator 22:26, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Roman-Spartan War[edit]

Don't worry about it Aldux. I know it was acciedental and it is easily fixed. :) Kyriakos 00:24, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ultras[edit]

Edit conflict with user Macedonian Empire over positioning of the RoM section of the article. I've tried telling him that it's convention to use RoM for the name through edit comments and on his talk page (which he likes to blank every time someone edits it), but to no avail. I can't find the actual vote that resulted in the RoM convention, or else I'd try shoving that in his face, but I doubt he'd pay heed to it. Suggestions? Greekfire 12:09, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


WikiProject History of Greece Newsletter - Issue IV - December 2006[edit]

The December 2006 issue of the WikiProject History of Greece newsletter has been published.

You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link.

Thank you.--Yannismarou 14:57, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Fada[edit]

You should make a link to the battle in Libyan-Chadian War somewhere. At least. --TheFEARgod (Ч) 17:07, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Armenian Kingdom of Mitanni[edit]

Hello i think if we keep the articles separate it would be better because the mitanni article describes the location and some information on there kings while the Armenian kingdom of mitanni contains different info we can add it to the see also section. Plus people are not going to like this but the references are all reliable. Nareklm 18:30, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Grazie molto[edit]

Aldux, you did your part by pointing out unreferenced sections that I had missed and that long quote that really bothered me too. I didn't want to get rid of it as I thought it's important to understand the speech at the rostra, all is well now. Btw your early tips from last spring regarding the Orontids did have a lasting impact on my future edits. Cheers and Merry Christmas!-- Ευπάτωρ Talk!! 18:05, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agathoclea's RfA[edit]

Hello, and thank you for the support on my recent RfA. I was particluarly pleased about your remembering our early interaction. I hope I can live up to your trust, and certainly welcome any and all feedback. All the best, and thanks again! — Agathoclea 13:14, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

85.73.74.181[edit]

Hey, are you reporting 85.73.74.181 on WP:ANI as a sock of the greek chauvanist junta guy, or shall I? Peace, delldot | talk 19:57, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unfotunately, it would be only a loss of time; it's dear community-banned Kaltsef, and his IP is dynamic, and not static.--Aldux 20:04, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Source[edit]

Re this, I know it is the case, but I cannot provide a source. I had seen that addition earlier and didn't revert it. You may consider re-adding it and put a {{fact}} tag. NikoSilver 20:45, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done. BTW, have you got my e-mail? Ciao,--Aldux 21:03, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My Request for Adminship[edit]

Aldux/Archive 8

Thanks for your support on my successful Request for Adminship (final result 78 Support /0 Oppose / 1 Neutral) I have now been entrusted with the mop, bucket and keys. I will be slowly acclimating myself to my new tools over the next months. I am humbled by your kind support and would certainly welcome any feedback on my actions. Please do not hesitate to contact me. Once again, many thanks and happy new year! All the best, Asteriontalk 13:29, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ur message[edit]

Thx for leaving me a message. I am sorry if you got the wrong impression that I was trying to say something bad about u, or making any assumptions that you were doing something wrong.It's just that it seems to me that the Pusyamitra hoax is being given undue importance on wikipedia, thanks to partisan ideologies and political interests. This observation is based on my reading many wiki articles where allegations of his "persecution of Buddhists" (based entirely upon Buddhist religious scripture) is prominently featured. The thing is that Sungas are a very unimportant footnote in Indian history in the face of greats like the Mauryan and Guptas, and it is not important enough to be featured so prominently across wikipedia. I think it only deserves brief mentioning on account of it's verifiability. In recent years, political parties and certain "academics" with partisan biases are harping on exaggerations relating to their attitudes towards Buddhism for political purposes (in an ancient country like India, history is often used to rake up political controversy). We in India know this problem well.My feeling is that wikipedia should not be used for political propaganda, and my attempt to put the academic truth (preferentially over Buddhist religious parables) was an attempt to depoliticize the article.I did not assume that you belonged to any such partisan group, and, if you thought I did, then I apologize.However, perhaps you should have opened a dialogue with me in the talk page to discuss my additions and I would have pointed you to the relevant subject matter. It would have avoided needless unpleasantness. Rumpelstiltskin223 17:19, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Votestacking[edit]

What is the problem? Is it forbidden and why???--GiorgioOrsini 17:25, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

By the bye I removed all messages posted to a number of editors informing them about Requested moves--GiorgioOrsini 17:42, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Your point of view, as given on my talk pages, is completely subjective and an unnecessary exaggeration.--GiorgioOrsini 19:08, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Advising[edit]

Hello, as you are a admnistrator familiar with certain things, I was wondering if you have the time, could advise me in a potential dispute. I do understand if you're too busy, but either way please leave answer on my talk page. Thank you--Kathanar 22:20, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello User:Aldux thank you for responding. I have a problem on the Graham Staines page. I undid a POV'd edit on that page by User:Bakasuprman, but it was reverted again to the POV'd version by a User:Rumpelstiltskin223. Would mind taking a look and give me your assessment of the situation. Thank you--Kathanar 22:38, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your participation in Graham Staines. could you please look at the talk page Talk:Graham Staines‎ and the incivil posts of User:Kathanar there that seem to violate WP:NPOV and WP:POINT. Do you concur? Rumpelstiltskin223 22:57, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, it seems that User:Kathanar persists in making derogatory and accusatory remarks in the talk page [13]. Perhaps you should converse with him as he seems to regard you well and us with contempt.Rumpelstiltskin223 01:12, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


No offence[edit]

No offence it was a nice message thanks but I am leaving now, I've just seen the sneaky little arbcom decision, and no one treats me like that, and I'm sick of this behaviour on wikipedia so I'm off to pastures new. Giano 01:21, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Faya[edit]

Hi Aldux. I just came across the article Faya-Largeau, which you moved to that title from Faya a little over (under, it seems) a year ago. Britannica and the Chadian government both say that the current name is actually Faya, so I'll shortly tag Faya (which has been converted into a dab page) with {{Db-g6}}, wait for it to be deleted, and then move Faya-Largeau there. Do you have any objections to this reversal of your move? Picaroon 02:43, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Scratch that, WP:CSD is backlogged and this doesn't really fit with CSD G6 anyways, so I'll send the request to WP:RM. Picaroon 05:33, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well first of all, I didn't write the Bodele article - my single edit to it was a copyedit. I agree that it is very well written - probably even a bit above what I'm capable of, in fact. (My closest DYK to Chad is Bayajidda, from northern Nigeria - he crossed Chad, but didn't stay. If I've written any Chad articles, they're just geo-stubs or bio-stubs that are so poor I've forgotten them already.) Anyways, because of what you showed me about the naming confusion, I'll withdraw the RM request and leave Faya as a redirect to Faya-Largeau (all incoming links seem to Faya seem to be for the town, not the plant.) Does this sound good? I'm not sure the current dab page, Faya (disambiguation), is needed at all now, because "X (disambiguation)" pages with two entries tend to be pretty useless. Picaroon 17:43, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well, first of all, the geo coordinates (17°55′00″N, 19°7′00″E) in the article are wrong. They're off by a little bit, maybe because no one with accurate equipment has ever been to northern Chad, maybe because the French didn't measure it right - I'm not sure why, but I know they aren't quite accurate. The 00s should probably be numbers.
Anyways, the locator dot was created so we wouldn't have to upload a picture with a big red dot on it for every town and city - with this, we can upload a national map and place the locator dot over the map. The x and y are coordinates (see also coordinate system for more on them and how to fiddle with them) help move the dot to the correct place. The coordinates in this version of the map had the red dot a little to the left of where the small black, so I adjusted it using the preview button until the dots were directly on top of eachother. I assume they weren't on top of eachother like they should've been because of the aforementioned inaccurate coordinates of Faya-Largeau. For me, at least, it was just guess&check work to get the x and y coordinates right. There might be a better way than what I did, but I'm not aware of it.
On an unrelated note, I noticed your sysop-nationaliy page. You might want to add Mailer diablo to Singapore and Redux to Brazil. Picaroon 19:31, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your awnsers. As for my sysop page, I'm trying to proceed systematically - thay is, first the sysops who's name starts with the A, and so on.--Aldux 19:55, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cleophis[edit]

Thank you for getting involved in this. I stumbled across this article while doing disambiguation link repair, so I thought I would make a bit of an effort to clean it up. I anticipated that I would be trying to convince Sze Cavalry of WP policies on my own, so I was pleasantly surprised when when you showed up. However, I must confess curiousity as to how you came across this (RC patrol? Sysop magic?). Also, please let me know if you think I could have handled this differently or better.--Kubigula (talk) 22:48, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kubigula. The reson I noted it is simply that I have a very vast watchlist, covering almost all Greece-related articles, among other things, only, these are really a lot of articles. As for the way you've handled the matter, I don't have any objections: you noted serious POV and OR problems, and you intervened with civility.--Aldux 20:22, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, the long watchlist - I might have guessed. My watchlist seems to grow by a few articles every day. Sze Cavalary seems to be waiting for your input on Cleophis. May I ask if you intend to edit the article more substantially? No pressure - if you have other areas you would prefer to spend your energy on, I will take a stab at reducing the POV and OR.--Kubigula (talk) 04:58, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

== My messages ==[edit]

Hello. Please don't delete any more messages that other people leave on my talk page, because I want to see them all. Thanks. Martin 12:38, 3 January 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Martinb1 (talk • contribs)

Thank you for your consideration[edit]

Thank you for the consideration you gave to my RfA. To be chosen as an administrator requires a high level of confidence by a broad section of the community. Although I received a great deal of support, at this time I do not hold the level of confidence required, and the RfA did not pass. You were one of the oppose votes, and raised concerns. I am more than willing to discuss those concerns with you if you are interested. Please let me know. Sincerely, --BostonMA talk 12:50, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

protect[edit]

Protecting ones talk page is contrary to the spirit of Wikipedia. Please reconsider. -- RHaworth 18:44, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would love to, believe me; unfortunately a sockpuppetering banned troll has insistently vandalized in a particularly irritating way the user and talk pages of those users that revert his edits and have brought to his banning, forcing me to semiprotect this talk, and he's still doing it with those who haven't wanted semiprotected their pages. So sorry, but till Kaltsef insists, I'll keep it semiprotected.--Aldux 00:36, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request[edit]

Ciao Aldux, would you mind checking out User talk:Khoikhoi/Unprotected#Blocking of 194.152.217.129, and tell me if this is Afrika paprika or not? Thanks, Khoikhoi 00:13, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again. Khoikhoi 01:15, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My talk page[edit]

You have done some reverts on my talk page once. Don't do that again. Thanks. Jakiša Tomić 13:23, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Oh, and you are admin!?!? Just great! Jakiša Tomić 13:39, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
"All rollback edits are signed as minor"? Are you joking or are you think I am stupid? I don't care about Julije Klović, Giulio Clovio, you, that user who asked me to vote, that Italian user, Fidel Castro, Jesus Christ, Joseph Stalin, Adolf Hitler and all other nationalists on Wikipedia. Just leave me alone.Jakiša Tomić 16:27, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FYR Macedonia at the 2004 Summer Olympics[edit]

Hi Aldux, I realize (as you did) that Asteraki's edits to those articles were not normal procedure, but to be honest, the end results were correct. Take a look at Category:Republic of Macedonia at the Olympics. The 2004 article is the only one that doesn't follow the naming conventions we have agreed upon in the Wikipedia:WikiProject Sports Olympics. I wanted to rename that page previously but could not because of previous moves. As you are an admin, could you please move that article to achieve the same result? Thanks, Andrwsc 16:01, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Following your request I've moved the page to the correct location, preserving the page history. Ciao, --Aldux 16:56, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, much appreciated! I had been planning to post a request on the "requested moves" page but this speeds up that process. Andrwsc 17:12, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the explanation[edit]

Somehow I missed your reply on my talk page. All I can say is that he or she should appeal their ban to ArbCom. Cheers and happy new year, Asteriontalk 23:35, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RfA[edit]

Hi, Aldux! And a happy new year! It is the first time we "speak" since the intrusion of 2007! Do you remember explaining me the virtues of being an administrator?! I think I'll go for it, although I still want my time for my articles, and I hope the new duties and responsibilities (if, of course, the RfA is successful, which is something unpredictable) will not jeopardize my editing work. What made me re-think the whole thing was Alcibiades's appearance in the main page tomorrow. I had told you that I will think about it, and I will decide about January 10. Now that I was thinking and re-thinking the whole thing, the announcement of this important event for me in Wikipedia happened. I thought it might be a sign (well, I'm a bit superstitious; but don't worry, I try not to overdo it!), and I was "pushed" by this coincidence towards accepting the prospect of a RfA.

I don't know how should I organize the whole thing. Make a draft page somewhere with the nominations, the questions, the answers etc, and when I'am ready submit it officially? How does this thing work? In any case, I'd be happy if you, Nicos and Rob, namely you who made the proposal and the two other users who commented on it (and with whom I have shared some of the most vivid and creative moments in Wikipedia), could co-nominate me. I would be really honored. Maybe we can prepare the nominatios, then work the (obligatory - if understand how RfA works) questions-answers, and Monday-Tuesday - if I feel everything is ready - submit it. I do not want to hurry; what matters to me is to make the things properly and try to be accurate and well-prepared for the whole proceedure. I wait for your comments. Regards!--Yannismarou 21:32, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, good! Go for it! That way you will be able block me next time I remove Greek poems from my userpage... :-) As for the process, what I did myself was to prepare most of my answers offline. But of course you can also create a page. If you like you can create it right away in the WP:RFA/... namespace; other people will be supposed to leave it alone until you actually list it at the main WP:RFA page. - Just one thing, about co-nominators, I remember some discussion on RFA talk some time ago where it turned out some people find multiple co-noms annoying. So maybe it's better to get a single person to do the nomination but prepare it well. Of course, Aldux is quite good at these things... :-) Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:04, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Aye to all that. Off-line, one-nom, not-me! NikoSilver 22:20, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the advice!--Yannismarou 13:10, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This is fantastic!!!!! :-) Don't worry, I hadn't forgotten, I was keeping my fingers crossed, it's great to hear you accepted. And thanks to FPS for his compliments, even if I'm not sure I really deserve them. ;-)--Aldux 18:41, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
From words to action I see! Thanks! Just give me 1-3 days to work the answers.--Yannismarou 08:41, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey[edit]

Are you online right now? Khoikhoi 20:58, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Khoi :-) All OK?--Aldux 21:06, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I'm good.

Could you please semi-protect Iğdır Province, and possibly fully protect Turkification? Khoikhoi 21:11, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Grazie molto. Khoikhoi 21:38, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Help:Translation[edit]

Hi. I need some help in translating/verifying the examples in Reflexive verb to Italian (plus, some fact-checking regarding Italian). As you can see, the examples should denote common usages across 5 languages, so, if the appropriate form in Italian is not reflexive, please substitute it with a reflexive one (I'll take care of the Slavic translations).

I'm posting this same message to Asterion (talk · contribs) (regarding Spanish), so please check the edit history if he did his part before you... and watch for edit conflicts :-). Duja► 11:53, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Grazie! Duja► 13:23, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Aldux/Archive_8&oldid=1146429246"