User talk:Ahmad2099

السلام عليكم و رحمة الله و بركاته

As-Salamu Alaykum Wa Rahmatu Allahe Wa Barakatuh Ahmad2099 (talk) 12:46, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

did you read wp:cite as per the edit summary? Chensiyuan (talk) 12:41, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

take it to Henry's talk page; explain what you're trying to include there because I don't really understand it. Chensiyuan (talk) 14:16, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

i meant take it to talk and develop the argument there. Chensiyuan (talk) 14:29, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Regarding your recent post on the 'Salafi' page, is Da'i al-Islam a title or part of a proper name? If this is a title then I think it safe to assume that more than one name is necessary to identify him. Supertouch (talk) 20:56, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

I am aware of the fact that Da'i al-Islam can be both a name and a title - in general, this is refered to a laqb. My question stems from the fact that I do not know who this person you have refered to is, thus he would require more of his proper name to properly identify him. Unless of course he well known to other than me, although even then it would still be helpful to have more of a name for this person. For example, if we say Shihaab al-Deen al-'Asqalaanee, most will understand this to refer to Ahmad ibn 'Alee ibn Hajr as this was his laqb. However in order to find his biography in any of the biographical collections, his complete, proper name is necessary. Supertouch (talk) 13:47, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

As-Salaamu 'Alaikum, I skimmed through the article you sent a link for. It does affirm the fact that this individual is known as Da'i al-Islam, however, it does nothing to identify him as being Salafy or otherwise. While it does mention an organization with the word Salafy in its name, it does not specify him as being from that organization, it simply lists several organizations and then several individuals. Secondly, even if we were tto ascertain his being Salafy, he does not seem to possess the significance or scholarship to be mentioned on the Salafy page. I would strongly recommend his removal from the page. Supertouch (talk) 17:43, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Varieties of Arabic

Please stop trying to de-emphasize the separateness of the Arabic varieties. They are often considered separate languages by many linguists and that is the position that Wikipedia generally follows. I am well aware of the position of traditional Arabic linguists that these are just dialects and should not be emphasized. That, however, is not the position of professional linguists. They are more than dialects (although, perhaps, a bit less than separate languages). That is why the term "varieties" is used. These issues have been carefully worked out long before now. (Taivo (talk) 14:23, 19 August 2009 (UTC))

Speedy deletion nomination of L'usine (brand)

A tag has been placed on L'usine (brand), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 10:46, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Mumtaz Mahal

Hi there, regarding your recent change to Mumtaz Mahal, that woman was a was of 100% Persian ancestory. That is a well known fact in both India and Iran. Please do not make anymore changes. --74.12.104.201 (talk) 16:50, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

I saw the note you left for me about this article. I'm not sure what you want me to do or what exactly you're pointing out. Could you be more specific. AniMate^draw 01:28, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

September 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your recent edits to Download Accelerator Plus have been reverted as they could be seen to be defamatory or potentially libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Upon further inspection of provided source it is determined that despite the trojan having "DAP" in its title it is unrelated to the DAP featured in said article. It is instead related to users of some Brazilian bank as detailed in the source. In future edits please read through all sources before making accusations towards a company that may be unfounded. Such false statements are defamation and repeated offenses can lead to you being blocked from editing and/or visiting Wikipedia. Cheers, JakeDHS07 04:06, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Jerusalem. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Topic has been under discussion on the article's talk page. Hertz1888 (talk) 00:46, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. Aren't you reading the edit summaries? There have been four messages left there indicating that the topic is under discussion on the Jerusalem article's talk page—as I also indicated above—and that a consensus would be needed for change. You are welcome to join the discussion. Please do not continue repeatedly re-inserting the same edit. Hertz1888 (talk) 22:44, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Coat of arms of Iran appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. Gabriel Kielland (talk) 08:50, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

WP:AN/I

The best course of action if you see someone breaking the rules is to take it to one of the administrators noticeboards. Most likely WP:Administrators noticeboard/Incidents will be your best bet. AniMate^draw 22:21, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

What AniMate said, but of course warn him/her on their talk first and see if you could successfully explain to the user how they're breaking the rules before going to the noticeboard. --Al Ameer son (talk) 00:00, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

I don't think the article will meet the Deletion criteria, but I could be wrong (it's a lot of reading to do). I just looked at the edit history of al-Mutanabbi and I noticed that both of you have seriously violated the three-revert rule which could ultimately lead to temporary blocks for both of you regardless of who started it. I won't report you or the other user this time, but please do not participate in edit wars in the future. The right thing to do is to take it up on the talkpage where you and other editors could discuss the issues. If that fails because one of the parties is continuing to edit war or is uncooperative, bring it up to the noticeboard. Right now I noticed no discussion has taken place at the talkpage, so you should start a thread there. Salam akhi and Ramadan karim! --Al Ameer son (talk) 03:37, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

My pleasure ;) For unreferenced articles, we just add the unreferenced tag and keep it there until the article is referenced. We could also bring up on the talkpage that one of those persons listed is not a Shia Muslim and if the user doesn't add a source that says he/she is a Shia Muslim, then we must remove that person from the list. There are probably a number of debatable people listed in that article such as Ali who I thought was just a Muslim, not Shia or Sunni, and the Assad presidents of Syria who are Alawite Muslims. --Al Ameer son (talk) 19:21, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

HI

--NotedGrant Talk 17:47, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

just dropping in to say hi --NotedGrant Talk 17:22, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Ahmad I visited Jeddah a few months back it's a cool place

I visited Madinah too, had to stay in a hotel near the grand mosque.Madinah is a cool place but the roads are not wide enough I think Ar-Riyadh is the best city in KSA . I'm from hyderabad India Hyderabad is a good place ,but not as cool as your place ;) --NotedGrant Talk 17:59, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Yep thanks aid a happy Eid to you too BYE--NotedGrant Talk 18:10, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Grammar

Hello, I have noticed that some of your recent contributions have had the effect of reducing the legibility of the sentences you are editing. For example: "The largest Shīʿite sect in the early 21st century was the Ithnā ʿAshariyyah[5]., constitute the majority of the population in Iran,[6] Azerbaijan,[7] Bahrain,[8], Lebanon, and Iraq." Please don't negate your efforts by failing to consider the overall effect of your spelling/grammar/punctuation. Kind regards, Pob1984 (talk) 00:17, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Mobily logo.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Mobily logo.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILY ^(TALK) 07:00, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

conservapedia

Is not a reliable source, stop using it. nableezy - 23:37, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

what does that even mean? Wikipedia does not use itself as a reference. Conservapedia is not a reliable source by any definition of either "reliable" or "source". Please remove it. nableezy - 23:40, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

Dido. Please stop this. You've already broken the 3RR rule. I'll assume good faith and won't report you. Thanks. --Ⲗⲁⲛⲧⲉⲣⲛⲓⲝ^[talk] 23:46, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

Bashar al-Assad

If you continue to make that edit I will bring the matter to the attention of administrators. You are edit-warring, and worse you are edit-warring to insert a blatant falsehood in an encyclopedia article. Stop doing that. nableezy - 20:03, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a short time for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Kuru (talk) 19:22, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

April 2012

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Bohemian Grove. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 14:26, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Hamour, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use your sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Jakebarrington (talk) 00:54, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

If only you paid attention to the talk page unstead of stubbornely removing something that has been proved hours before... --DanielUmel (talk) 21:49, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

WP:OR

I ask you kidnly to stop making the WP:OR. You make your own conclusions. It's clearly what is writen in the article, and how did you find out there is some Hezbollah unit in Aleppo? That's not what is writen. Again, as I asked you on the talk page, I ask you here also to revert your own edit. --Wustenfuchs 00:11, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for understanding. I responded your question on my talk page. --Wustenfuchs 00:29, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Battle of aleppo page

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Battle of Aleppo (2012), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. DanielUmel (talk) 16:36, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

ISIS

This is at least the second time you have reverted "Sunni Islamism" to "Kharijite" in the Lead in this article, without giving any explanation in the edit summary. Please explain on the Talk page why you keep making this major change and read the section "Ideology and beliefs". You will be reverted again as the consensus is to name "Sunni Islamism" as their faith, as you will see here. You need to convince other editors before you can change this to "Kharijite". --P123ct1 (talk) 17:08, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for responding so promptly. I will get in touch with the editor who wrote the section on "Ideology and beliefs", particularly as very few editors read Arabic and the citations you give are in Arabic. I have reverted you in the meantime until some consensus can be reached on what to call ISIS, Shias or Kharijites. I know little about this myself, but I do know it is controversial. Please ignore my "vandal" in the edit summary; it was wrong of me to use that word and I apologise. I reverted before I saw your post on the Talk page. --P123ct1 (talk) 22:06, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Persian Gulf, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sharjah. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mobily logo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mobily logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ahmad2099. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)