User talk:Afronig

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Afronig, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 04:49, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm SuperHamster. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Conservapedia, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 04:49, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Roxy the dog. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Jaywalking because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Roxy the dog™ (resonate) 18:12, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indictment of Rick Perry[edit]

Please be careful when changing things like this. [1] Indictments don't use "allegedly". And please read WP:SCAREQUOTES. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 03:26, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Even if indictments are not WP:BLP compliant, Wikipedia is. Newspapers use allegedly in regards to indictments all the time. Afronig (talk) 15:27, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your link says alleged is appropriate in the context of accusation of crime. Thus, I will re-add pursuant to this policy and WP:BLP. Afronig (talk) 15:29, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When using certain templates (such as welcome templates and user warnings) on talk pages, as you did to Obongo, don't forget to substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use {{subst:uw-test1}} instead of {{uw-test1}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template. Thank you. Safiel (talk) 02:18, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In particular, when proposing deletion, please use {{subst:Proposed deletion|1=Your reason for deletion}} . Thanks. Safiel (talk) 02:22, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Indictment of Rick Perry may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

| data8 = [[Summons]]<ref>[http://mobile.nytimes.com/2014/08/19/us/texas-governor-perry-will-face-summons-not-an-arrest-

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:19, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reply[edit]

I forgot to revert the warnings. No ill intent on my behalf. T.C.Haliburton^{talk nerdy to me} 22:41, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015[edit]

Your recent editing history at Death of Eric Garner shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Dyrnych (talk) 22:00, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Reliable Sources Noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello, Afronig. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Is a medical examiner's report a reliable source for a cause of death?.The discussion is about the topic Death of Eric Garner. Thank you. --Dyrnych (talk) 18:14, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Dyrnych. Afronig (talk) 04:45, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 6[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dallas County District Attorney, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Republican. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 23[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bush v. Gore, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fantasy football. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dallas Police Association[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dallas Police Association requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 04:14, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dallas Police Association[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dallas Police Association requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 05:16, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ANI[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Konveyor Belt (talk • contribs) 21:53, 4 June 2015‎ (UTC)[reply]

June 2015[edit]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing because it is believed to have been compromised. Note that edits to your user talk page might not indicate that you have regained control of your account. If your privileges to e-mail and edit your user talk page have been revoked, contact ArbCom at arbcom-appeals-enlists.wikimedia.org.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 02:31, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]