Jump to content

User talk:AdamWimborne

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AdamWimborne (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

All bar one of these edits and created pages have been real and have also had everything required in them to constitute an acceptable and respectable page. Yes, i admit Konstantin the Bolivian General was a HOAX, there were many reasons for this: 1) I was acting as an investigative journalist curious as to whether wikipedia is still maintaining its standards. AdamWimborne (talk) 18:51, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Reading this request and your remarks below it is clear you are not here to contribute constructively. I don't believe for one second that you are a professional investigative journalist but if you really are make sure to report on how we caught your hoax and blocked your disruptive account and didn't listen to your lies, that reflects rather well on us if you ask me. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:13, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AdamWimborne (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

your reason here I demand an arbitration concerning my immediate harassment claims against Dougweller and Haploidavey also i would like to be unblocked thank you AdamWimborne (talk) 19:29, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No valid reason given to unblock. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 19:59, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AdamWimborne (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

May i request a comprimise: I appreciate that you have banned me for numerous reasons and this is an innconveinece to all parties and i think that an agreement can be reached. Recently Dougweller contacted me about the possiblitiy of mentoship, i ignored this at the time, however i would, in veiw of recent circumstancesbe more wiling to accept this, if, on the condition that Dougweller would become my mentor. Please respondAdamWimborne (talk) 14:12, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

There isn't room for compromise with people who deliberately defraud our readers and waste our volunteers' time. You'll need to find another hobby. --jpgordon::==( o ) 15:46, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AdamWimborne (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Firstly, i would like to apologise for my behaviour. As shown by many users it has been unacceptable and childish as a result i appreciate the reasons for why i was blocked indefinatly from wikipedia. I would still very much like to become part of wikipedias editing team but now realise that i have a lot of convincing to do in order for this to happen. I again request that Dougweller becomes my mentor, however, i know i am not in a position to barter so i would accept any mentor or other restrictions placed upon me as you see fit. Once more i apologise and if this is declined, as i expect it will be, please inform me of whether there is any chance of me ever being unblocked. If it is not possible to unblock me then please could you set a time limit for the block? Indefinite is a long time. Sorry AdamWimborne (talk) 17:09, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This request for unblocking has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

  • Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
  • Read our guide to improving articles
  • Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
  • Click the Edit tab at the top of that article and scroll down past the message informing you of your block.
  • Copy the source of that article and paste it to the bottom of your talk page under a new top-level heading (like this: = [[Article title]] =) and save the page before you improve it.
  • Propose some significant and well researched improvements to your article by editing your personal copy of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
  • When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
    • If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{helpme|your question here}}" to your talk page. Thank you. Selket Talk 19:50, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.