User talk:Ad.minster

Welcome to Ad.minster's talk page. I will generally respond here to comments that are posted here, rather than replying via your talk page (or the article's talk page, if you are writing to me here about an article), so you may want to watch this page until you are responded to, or let me know where specifically you'd prefer the reply.

Are you lost?

This user is NOT known for taking themself too seriously.

Actually, the Internet is serious business.

Beware! This user's talk page is patrolled by talk page stalkers.

Welcome![edit]

Thank you! That is very kind, and I do love chocolate chips! Yumm. Ad.minster (talk) 19:35, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're quite welcome. Make sure to use the links too, they're the meal for which the cookies are the dessert for. —Elipongo (Talk contribs) 21:55, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Civility[edit]

Hello,

I hope not to seem unfriendly or make you feel unwelcome, but I noticed your username,...

		Civility Award
		Thank you for responding so appropriately to to the RFCN request. –xeno (talk) 14:45, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My first barnstar! Thank you!! Ad.minster (talk) 16:30, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations![edit]

		The Original Barnstar
		Thanks for all your careful contributions on articles related to Anglicanism and the English Reformation! All my best, Wyeson 21:57, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why thank you! Wow again. Ad.minster (talk) 02:33, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please move on[edit]

I'm doing you a favour and helping you move on with that incident that seems to stick in your mind by deleting the relevant material. Let's just remember we're all here to build an encyclopedia. best regards, –xeno (talk) 03:43, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about? Ad.minster (talk) 03:45, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The difficult people bit. –xeno (talk) 03:47, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Are you referring to someone in particular? Ad.minster (talk) 03:51, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

eh, if you don't remember, neither do I. I'm off for the evening. cheers, –xeno (talk) 03:56, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if you had been talking about anyone in particular, I would have told you to keep an eye on him. Anyone who makes so much trouble for so many excellent Wikipedians couldn't be an asset. Fortunately, you weren't talking about anyone or anything. I think another barnstar is in order, don't you? Cheers, Ad.minster (talk) 04:08, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you can put it behind you than you never know. but please make a concerted effort to do so. –xeno (talk) 12:46, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

		The Half Barnstar
		For putting differences aside. –xeno (talk) 03:31, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tb's deletion of articles[edit]

Can somebody get Tb to move on?

He is still following me all over Wikipedia, reverting everything I do and making trouble whenever he pleases.

Here is and example of the WP:Hounding, of a link to a list, made by User:Tb of articles that he has deleted in the past by way of redirects and other means and which, since he has carefully listed them out, he plans to delete again: [1]. Fortunately, Tb provides all the evidence himself of what is known as WP:Hounding, whereby a user follows an editor(s) around and reverts everything they did. It is also called disruption, and indeed Tb's sole purpose here on Wikipedia seems to be that.

I wish he would move on and leave me alone. Ad.minster (talk) 11:06, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

there have been no rulings against him interacting with you. rdunn PLIB 12:34, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. –xeno (talk) 12:44, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reformed Episcopal seminary articles[edit]

Hi, Ad.minster! I'd like to ask for your input about the R.E. seminary articles. I merged them into the REC article in February, but I see you've recreated them. I've started a discussion about the issue at Talk:Reformed Episcopal Church. Chonak (talk) 18:56, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Ad.minster. You have new messages at East718's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

لenna vecia 05:56, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ETS-seal.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ETS-seal.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:44, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Local churches" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Local churches and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 13#Local churches until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 01:09, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]