User talk:Absurdist1968

References[edit]

Medical articles on Wikipedia must be cited by the best available evidence and written in a consistent format. A list of resources to help edit such articles can be found here. Additionally, the diberri tool will aid in the formatting of references; all one needs to do is cut and paste the results. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Cheers. --Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 01:34, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Real World: Los Angeles[edit]

Hi. Welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks for working to improve the site with your edit to The Real World: Los Angeles, as we really appreciate your participation. However, the edit had to be reverted, because Wikipedia cannot accept unsourced material or original research. This includes material lacking cited sources, or obtained through personal knowledge or unpublished synthesis of previously published material. Wikipedia requires that all material added to articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable sources explicitly cited in the text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here. If you have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. :-) Nightscream (talk) 10:41, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't read the Basketball Wives article, so I cannot comment on its lack of references, but one could speculate that because narrative works are self-sourcing for their own content, perhaps whoever wrote that passage figured that merely mentioning that she appeared in on The Real World: Los Angeles was sufficient, since her mere appearance on it can be verified by watching any given episode. But more specific stuff, like aspects of her personal life, require a more explicit citation, whether it's an episode cite, or some other source. But material can't be added to one article just because it appears in another, since that would violate WP:CIRCULAR. I've re-added most of the material you had previously added, with a cite to a page at VH1's website. Thanks. :-) Nightscream (talk) 11:24, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Addendum: I took a look at the Basketball Wives article, and noticed that article also contains specific information that is unsourced, including personal info and material such as mentions of alleged infidelity on Kenny Robinson's part. This is not permitted. I added the aforementioned VH1 source, and paraphrased it a bit, but I removed the material not supported by that source. If you can find sources for that info, feel free to re-add it.

In addition, I noticed that almost all of the main cast member info plagiarized copyright-protected content from VH1's website. This is not only against WP policy, but it's against the law. I removed that material, but it can always be re-added, so long as it is paraphrased, and citations are given for it. I'm sorry about the work that this means for editors on that article, but the person who added it in that fashion should not have done so, as it can get Wikipedia into legal trouble. Nightscream (talk) 11:46, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A page filled with citation templates for every possible medium is at WP:Citation templates. I myself use the episode cite template frequently, and you can see this in the various Real World articles, in particular those for the first four seasons and the article for the current season. Feel free to ask me if you ever need anything else. Nightscream (talk) 20:20, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Remarkably clean talk page you have[edit]

Something about your name here and edits interested me. Your edits are not so incredibly short. So, it's pretty amazing that other editors never seem to feel any reason to talk here. Anyway, no offense intended in marking up your talk page with stuff not about editing. You should get some kind of star for making inoffensive edits, I would think. No comments here since long ago means, with all your editing, you must be doing an awful lot right.173.15.152.77 (talk) 11:08, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Close paraphrasing[edit]

You identified Andrew Litton regarding close paraphrasing. Do you know which site you found that seemed to be close?

I'm trying to track down the problem, but it would be helpful if you identified the potential source.--SPhilbrick (Talk) 02:01, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks (and in retrospect, should have been obvious to me - I started with a Google search, foiund a small overlap with a minor website, and wondered if that was it, then asked without looking closely.)--SPhilbrick (Talk) 11:53, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages![edit]

Hello, Absurdist1968. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by -- Trevj (talk) 09:30, 20 November 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

A belated welcome![edit]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Absurdist1968. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! -- Trevj (talk) 09:31, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute Resolution[edit]

Hello Absurdist1968, my name is Howicus. Just letting you know that there's a discussion at WP:DRN that you might be interested in. You can find the discussion here: [1]. Howicus (talk) 13:31, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 22[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Spano, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kevin Connolly (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Vicious (TV series) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

url=http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00CFF9HA2/comedyguide-21/ |title=Vicious - Series 1 [DVD] |publisher=Amazon.co.uk |date= |accessdate=2013-04-24}}</ref> On 23 August 2013, it
Warren]] as Penelope''' – A dotty old friend of Freddie and Stuart with either [[Narcolepsy]] (or mere absent-mindedness. It was revealed in the Christmas special that Penelope had a fling with

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:59, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Big Poppa E ‎ , but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 06:33, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:13, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Absurdist1968. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Absurdist1968. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Absurdist1968. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Absurdist1968. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Absurdist1968. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 11[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brittney Griner, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cynthia Cooper (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:48, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]