User talk:A Random Plant Wikipedian

Welcome!

Hi A Random Plant Wikipedian! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! --🐦DrWho42👻 00:51, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Robiquetia aberrans has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Robiquetia aberrans. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:25, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robiquetia aberrans has been accepted

Robiquetia aberrans, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:27, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, A Random Plant Wikipedian. Thank you for your work on Cymbidium faberi. User:Hughesdarren, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

Hi there, Nice work. I added some categories and did some unit conversions. Could you check my work please? Regards

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Hughesdarren (talk) 02:28, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

POWO vs. WFO

Hello, @A Random Plant Wikipedian. I don't know if you've run across this yet, but for non-ferns on Wikipedia the preferred database for taxonomic questions like synonyms and accepted names is Plants of the World Online. In your edit of Thelesperma filifolium you used World Flora Online as your source. It is fine, good and in this case agrees with POWO. When editing a plant native to the US I'll usually put in information from both of them and the USDA PLANTS database as well in the taxonomic section either to show there is agreement or disagreement. Example what I did with all the subspecies in Geum triflorum. But for the list of synonyms I always use POWO since for now that is the one that the WP:Plants project has collectively decided to follow. No need to change what you did since they are identical in this case. MtBotany (talk) 15:35, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for the information. I did look at both of the databases for T. filifolium, I was unsure of which one to use, so I chose World Flora Online. I will use POWO in the future for non-ferns.

Just out of curiousity, What taxonomic database is used for ferns? A Random Plant Wikipedian (talk) 15:48, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

We use World Ferns. More information about resources is under that tab at WP:WikiProject_Plants/Resources. If you go to the talk tab there you'll see me asking a lot of questions about exactly how to do things and the behavior of tags and so on.

I actually used WFO from my first edits of pages and had to move a page later on. Still need to get back to Drymocallis fissa and make it more complete now that I know so much more about editing.

Edit to add: One more thing. Do you know about the Flora of North America website? I is my goto for full botanical descriptions since it is freely available online. It occurs to me that I should update the resource list to link to the current site at beta.floranorthamerica.org [1]. MtBotany (talk) 16:24, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for the World Ferns link, and the WP:WikiProject_Plants/Resources link.

and yes, I do know FNA.

I have it in the bookmarks bar of my browser. A Random Plant Wikipedian (talk) 16:45, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thelesperma nuecense has been accepted

Thelesperma nuecense, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hey man im josh (talk) 01:11, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Unreferenced articles February 2024 backlog drive

WikiProject Unreferenced articles | February 2024 Backlog Drive
There is a substantial backlog of unsourced articles on Wikipedia, and we need your help! The purpose of this drive is to add sources to these unsourced articles and make a meaningful impact. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles cited. Remember to tag your edit summary with [[WP:FEB24]], both to advertise the event and tally the points later using Edit Summary Search. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you have subscribed to the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:38, 20 January 2024 (UTC)