User talk:98.128.235.142

May 2022[edit]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:19, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have read the talk page and its imposible to get a consensus. There are editors who write good reasons to edit the same as i edited, but others always reject thats editions without giving reasons or just giving a single pointless reason. 98.128.235.142 (talk) 14:06, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Then the information does not get added until there is consensus to include it. That's the way Wikipedia works.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:06, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Then, the power of Wikipedia resides in the editors who have been around the longest and it is edited according to their wishes, without impartiality…sad. 98.128.235.142 (talk) 14:54, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, article content is determined by consensus. You could be here for 15+ years and have 200k+ edits under your belt and you still don't get to force disputed content through.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 15:48, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.