User talk:7265

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Pa 1977 9700-medium.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Pa 1977 9700-medium.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:35, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

File:Reed-College-ODB-lrg.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Reed-College-ODB-lrg.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Blurpeace 03:11, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of ubiquitous computing research centers

The article List of ubiquitous computing research centers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

link farm for random computer science and electronic engineering groups.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 05:16, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Reed-College-Eliot-Hall-fall-lrg.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Reed-College-Eliot-Hall-fall-lrg.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Blurpeace 03:23, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Olde-Reede-RennFayre06.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Olde-Reede-RennFayre06.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Blurpeace 16:53, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Reed-College-Front-Lawn-ODB-crop.JPG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Reed-College-Front-Lawn-ODB-crop.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:27, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of List of ubiquitous computing research centers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of ubiquitous computing research centers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of ubiquitous computing research centers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 10:33, 2 August 2020 (UTC)