User talk:37.190.146.24

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (37.190.146.24) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing!  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 23:21, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Squaw, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Flagging cited content as "dubious" is not the appropriate use of the template when the citation supports the content. Flagging cited content as "dubious" because you don't like what the cited content says is a misuse of the template and could be seen as disruptive. - CorbieV 19:47, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
I've been using those templates by the seat of my pants---my fault.
Then again...
Purpose
(...)
to question the veracity, accuracy, or methodology employed by a given source
(...)
Further on:
Incorrect uses
(...)
to question the reliability / verifiability of a source – use [unreliable source?]
(...)
A rather fine distinction at best. 37.190.146.24 (talk) 00:11, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]