User talk:216.165.126.102

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Stop already--Frip1000 04:44, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was making legitimate changes and adding the views that exist among many modern people on the subject, why was I blocked, nothing I added was untrue

You failed to stop when signaled. Blocked for three hours. ~Kylu (u|t) 04:52, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

March 26, 2007[edit]

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Amos HanTalk to me./Contribs) 02:09, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Chris cheese whine 02:26, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Centralia, Pennsylvania has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\bmyspace\.com' (link(s): http://www.myspace.com/shannonkealey) . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thorougly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creators copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 16:19, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

August 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Santiago Magill has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Sam Korn (smoddy) 22:57, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Tucker Max. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DarkAudit (talk) 22:39, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

September 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Toilet paper has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Thingg 20:33, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: The New York Times history contribution[edit]

I have not edited that page since your edit (or ever, as far as I can recall), you may need to address your concerns to the editor which reverted your contribution rather than me. +Hexagon1 (t) 04:24, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page David H. Adams has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. —SpaceFlight89 20:41, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011[edit]

Hello and welcome! I edit Wikipedia too, under the username ScottSteiner. Wikipedia is written by people like you and me, so thank you for taking the time to participate. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Publication of Darwin's theory with this edit, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions about editing, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! ScottSteiner 22:03, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]