User talk:212.219.240.8

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 2019[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Binod Basnet. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to List of energy resources have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Binod Basnet (talk) 09:19, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2020[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Organisation internationale de la Francophonie. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. David Biddulph (talk) 17:18, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. El_C 11:51, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Motherboard has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:27, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Aberdare. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. William Avery (talk) 13:38, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Storm Dennis, you may be blocked from editing. Tdts5 (talk) 14:32, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020[edit]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ysgol Gyfun Rhydywaun. Aspects (talk) 02:25, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]