User talk:189.19.120.223

February 2018

Hello, I'm Walter Görlitz. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Diante do Trono, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:43, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

The changes made by me are not about citations or sources, but about improving the article, grammatical improvement. I did not remove any source and did not add. The references remain the same. The only thing I did was improve the article, using English correctly. --189.19.120.223 (talk) 15:23, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

You did not improve the article though. The tables for the albums are better. The infobox also is not correct. The associated acts are not supported in the article, and the link is to a disambiguation page. Why did you decide to italicize pop rock? If you'd like to keep the changes to the prose, those do seem to be better, but the rest are not, and it's the rest that many readers will be all that they look at. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:30, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Diante do Trono, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:38, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I cannot state this clearly enough. Your last changes were not an improvement. STOP NOW! Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:39, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Please stop continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Diante do Trono, without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. Do not remove that template again. I'll do so when all of the issues have been resolved. Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:37, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent editing history at Diante do Trono shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:37, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

not improvements

Let's look at one set of your supposed improvements: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Diante_do_Trono&curid=2758304&diff=827310434&oldid=827286929

• Changed date formats.
• Changing "unprecedented disk" to "unpublished record" makes sense, but it wasn't unpublished at all.
• "three hundred and fifty thousand" added, removing 350,000. per MOS:NUM, the number was correct. Same happens later with "three hundred thousand".
• "christian mainstream" is a violation of MOS:CAPS.
• The rest of the edits become convoluted because you merged two paragraphs.
• What's a "fifteen-year-long commemorative hotsite"? Not any more clear than what was there before.
• Broke MOS:ITALIC when you removed the formatting for Suomi Valtaistuimen Edessä. Albums are works that are italicized.
• How is "remakes" to "re-recordings" an improvement? At least you linked the correct album. Thanks.

I am going to stop there because of how convoluted the changes are. Please stop making major changes that are hard to track. I will request the page be locked if this continues, particularly if you don't 1) fix the errors I just showed you and 2) stop making more of them. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:15, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

As I was writing this you went and made an edit that were problematic again! Pleas s top until you actually learn how to edit. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:22, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

Again, where does Hillsong link? Not anywhere that a reader will be helped by.

The url parameter is to be lower case.

You completly damaged the cite param by changing "accessdate" to "acessdate" and "title=" to "título".

I'm done. I'm now reporting you and will fix you mistakes myself since you're incapable of doing so. The grammar changes are not worth the problems you're creating. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:36, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

Do not report me, just keep the grammatical changes. The improvements in the article are evident. A good article is one that has content and a grammatically correct text. The article has indeed improved.--189.19.120.223 (talk) 01:39, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

I have endeavoured to improve the article. If I introduced any factual errors or removed any vital (but unsourced) content, feel free to correct it. Do not attempt to make any wholesale changes to the article again. Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:09, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Thank you very much, Walter. It was in this agreement that I wanted to enter with you. I will not change anything. The article was great. One more time, thank you. --189.19.120.223 (talk) 00:40, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

---