User talk:174.255.128.131

March 2021[edit]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Talk:Wings of Fire (novel series), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Thanks, EDG 543 ^{(message me)} 22:48, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- ferret (talk) 17:38, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

174.255.128.131 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I fail to see how adding an edit request got me blocked for two weeks. Wikipedia, and all the creators on it are dumb, and it is unfair that idiots are controlling the information people are getting.If you are going to turn this request down, then I request that you tell me what I did wrong, in full, and on what page, plus a copy and paste of my edit that you thought was "disruptive".

I'm getting tired of making edit request after edit request to change something dumb on the article,and get denied again and again.I'm starting to wonder whether the person who made the "Minecraft" article has even played the game.

Again, it is unfair that these kinds of people, who don't even know what they are talking about, get to control the information people get.

And sometimes they are just plain wrong and are too lazy to edit their own dumb article.

For instance, once, I asked that a picture from a video game be updated.This lazy person asked me to supply said image, when he could have simply gone into the game, (probably for the first time) and taken the picture himself.

I've played that game before, and I know for a fact that it would take literally a minute to reenact said photo.

That is just one example of me being wrongly turned down on this website.

Another time, a person randomly listed a myth under a section which had nothing to do with it.

I requested that it be moved to another article, because it had nothing to do with that article and the definition was wrong anyway,and he refused.Three times.He was too lazy to copy and paste one sentence.

I believe that that was around the time I was blocked, for reasons I do not know, because again, the admin who blocked me was too lazy to provide a valid reason.

AGAIN I am requesting that you give a full and total explanation of what I did wrong, copy and paste the edits that you thought were disruptive, and list the page that the edits were on.

And I am just going to let you know I have waited way too long on a response to this request.

Decline reason:

Requests that contain personal attacks are not considered. 331dot (talk) 19:30, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

174.255.128.131 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I just got blocked for two weeks for adding an edit request, and the admin did not even give a valid explanation.

I am again asking that you PLEASE give a full and total explanation of what I did wrong with a copy and paste of my edit that you thought was disruptive, and an explanation of why you thought it was disruptive.

PLEASE do not just write another smug one-sentence answer.

DISCLAIMER This is not a personal attack

There i complied with all the rules PLEASE comply with my requests.

Decline reason:

This is not an unblock request. You are asking a question of your blocking admin and should not use the unblock template to do that. When you are ready to request an unblock, follow the instructions in WP:GAB. Yamla (talk) 14:23, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

WELL HOW AM I SUPPOSED TO ASK HIM I QUESTION WHEN I AM BLOCKED FROM EDITING HIS TALK PAGE

Can you copy and paste this onto his talk page for me pls deliver a message for me

please give me a good explanation for blocking me when all I did was submit an edit request and pls give me a copy and paste of the edit that u thought was disruptive

There can you pls copy and paste that onto his talk page pls

(the admin who blocked me was ferret)

Restored previous unblock requests. What part of "Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked." are you having trouble understanding? --Guy Macon (talk) 16:10, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You weren't "blocked for two weeks for adding an edit request". You were blocked for making FOUR edit requests.[1] The problem is that you refuse to accept the answer you got the first time. As can be seen from your edit history ( 174.255.128.131 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) ) refusing to accept an answer is something you keep doing again and again.

I recommend increasing the block length to one month and revoking talk page access per WP:NOTHERE and for refusing to follow simple instructions such as "Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked" and "When you are ready to request an unblock, follow the instructions in WP:GAB".

"Arguing with anonymous strangers on the Internet is a sucker's game because they almost always turn out to be -- or to be indistinguishable from -- self-righteous sixteen-year-olds possessing infinite amounts of free time." --Neil Stephenson, Cryptonomicon

--Guy Macon (talk) 16:43, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

174.255.128.131 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Thank you for your response. I now understand completely why I was blocked, and now request that you unblock me.

If you do, I can promise that I will no longer:

1.Submit multiple edit requests about the same thing

2.Vandalize pages

3.Edit war,(even if I believe that the other person is wrong.)

And 4.This will be my last unblock request, regardless of your response to it.

If you unblock me, Thank you.

If you don't, then I will simply wait it out.As you said before,I have infinite amounts of free time ;)

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. The block expired before any administrator took action. Yamla (talk) 17:44, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

April 2021[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is IP keeps bothering me. Thank you. Guy Macon (talk) 05:06, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.