User talk:154.0.133.66

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have been blocked from editing for in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy as a result of your repeated abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}}.

Sam Kuru (talk) 14:38, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

154.0.133.66 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't understand why you claim my information is false. You're welcome to do a full audit on investments and properties owned by my contribution

Decline reason:

Please make the request after signing in to your account. Yamla (talk) 16:05, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nixon Kitimoi (February 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Jamiebuba (talk) 09:44, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, 154.0.133.66! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jamiebuba (talk) 09:44, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. I don't understand why the Nixon Kitimoi article has been deleted and blocked @Jamiebuba @Kuru I used a format from other articles and the referenced sites I used have been accepted on other subjects. 154.0.133.66 (talk) 13:55, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@154.0.133.66 What other subjects have your references been accepted on? Jamiebuba (talk) 20:16, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Jamiebuba nataliey bitature, Keith kalyegira, Judith heard, Anita fabiola and others. So, I don't understand why @Kuru has blocked the creation of Nixon Kitimoi. Subject meets the Wikipedia notability guidelines, just like the other subjects mentioned. 154.0.133.66 (talk) 02:45, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You've been blocked cause most probably you are suspected of being a Sock of a banned user. How did you come to write about Nixon Kitimoi? You can appeal for an unblock if you feel you were blocked incorrectly? Jamiebuba (talk) 10:09, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Jamiebuba I came to write about Nixon Kitimoi just like the rest of the subjects; he is worthy of notice. References used were verifiable, reliable and independent.
Appeal to @Kuru? 154.0.133.66 (talk) 04:49, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Kuru@Jamiebuba new sources for Nixon Kitimoi; https://zivuga.co.ug/dr-nixon-kitimoi-charlene-ruto-named-in-the-100-most-influential-young-africans-2024/
https://zivuga.co.ug/nixon-kitimoi-wins-banking-and-finance-forty-under-40-award-2024/
https://dailywolf.co.ug/9145/charlene-ruto-named-among-100-most-influential-young-africans-with-nixon-kitimoi/
Can I create an article? 41.210.155.27 (talk) 09:44, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Material related to this person and his 'company' have been repeatedly spammed by COI or paid accounts. Many of the sources used have been, generously, false or self-published press releases. Given the history, I would not be open to removing blocks or protection until there are clearly notable and reliable sources provided. The above are not. Sam Kuru (talk) 11:09, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kuru Are there specific news outlets that you deem notable? 41.210.155.34 (talk) 11:31, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There are millions. Anonymous blog posts or churnalism parroting corny marketing claims are not. Sam Kuru (talk) 11:34, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Kuru are there any examples of Ugandan news outlets you can share? 41.210.155.34 (talk) 12:24, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Kuru Thanks for dealing with this, been on and off for a while now. Jamiebuba (talk) 17:27, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:154.0.133.66&oldid=1222563770"