User talk:1414domination

Hello and welcome to my talk page. I am here to avenge the death of my brother, 1412domination, by making constructive and worthwhile edits to this encyclopedia.

Blocked...?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

1414domination (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Not really sure what is the matter here. I've been blocked by a user named Materialscientist, and there seems to be some kind of a mistake. I certainly haven't done anything to warrant a blocking. I would appreciate it if I could just get back to improving Wikipedia so that others can enjoy it. 1414domination (talk) 04:16, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You haven't done anything? What about sockpuppetry? Max Semenik (talk) 04:44, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ok, I concede, but still.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

1414domination (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Ok, I mean yeah. I concede that I was guilty of sockpuppetry of the highest order. However, I still feel that what I did was not wrong, and have just one question for you. For committing sockpuppetry - in a positive way, I might add - should I be inherently classified as the worst person to ever walk the earth? Should you in no way actually look at the contributions I have made, and just immediately label me as a sockpuppeting, lowlife, piece of trash? I believe the answer is no, simply because had somebody actually looked at the edits I have made before blocking me, they would have seen that, while sockpuppetting, I was improving this encyclopedia, and that is what this is all about. 1414domination (talk) 18:18, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You're blocked for abusing multiple accounts; that doesn't make you the worst person in the world, just bad enough to annoy the community enough not to want you here. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 19:20, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

'Abusing' multiple accounts?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

1414domination (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I quite agree that I was using multiple accounts, but I was in no way abusing them. From Wikipedia:Sock puppetry: 'The use of multiple Wikipedia user accounts for an improper purpose is called sock puppetry.' Now, is there any actual, tangible evidence of this account being involved in any activities related to 'attempts to deceive or mislead other editors, disrupt discussions, distort consensus, avoid sanctions, evade blocks or otherwise violate community standards and policies'? 1414domination (talk) 23:46, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Yes, the "evade blocks" part, for example. You've wasted enough time; talk page access revoked. Huon (talk) 23:54, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.