User talk:129.97.125.3

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your IP address, 129.97.125.3, is registered to University of Waterloo, Canada and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are unable to create an account due to your institution's IP address being blocked, follow these instructions. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your network administrator or instructor and request that your school contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user.

Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using {{School block}}.

In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Educational institution staff and network administrators wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

January 2018[edit]

Hello, I'm Trut-h-urts man. Your recent edit to the page Curtis Granderson appears to have added premature information about a reported sports transaction, so it has been removed for now. The transaction is based on anonymous sources and/or awaiting an official announcement. If you believe the transaction has been completed, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Trut-h-urts man (T • C) 02:28, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019[edit]

Hello, I'm Frood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to HELP University— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. - Frood (talk!) 02:14, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Ifnord. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Rick Hansen Secondary School (Mississauga) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Ifnord (talk) 05:12, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Ixocactus. I noticed that you recently removed content from Stefan Molyneux without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Ixocactus (talk) 06:15, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2022[edit]

Your recent editing history at Führer shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Please stop it. Drmies (talk) 21:46, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, I did not see this message until now. That being said, I do not think what is occurring is fair on my part, as my edit was undone by the user User:Beyond My Ken because I did not start an RfC on the matter, however this same user has made edits before the conclusion of the RfC and yet they are not being left at the status quo. I do not see why another user's status quo for the page should be favoured over mine. I would like an explanation for this. 129.97.125.3 (talk) 21:49, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Führer) for a period of 2 weeks for edit warring.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 21:47, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

129.97.125.3 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

See above explanation, I am only protecting the status quo of the page prior to its changes that were not done before the conclusion of the RfC, and I do not feel that it is fair to favour this other user. 129.97.125.3 (talk) 21:51, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Nothing here convinces me you'll stop edit warring if unblocked from that page. Yamla (talk) 22:36, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Reverting JUST after an administrator told you to stop edit warring leads to a predictable outcome, and if you continue to flaunt our policies and guidelines that partial block is easily expanded. Drmies (talk) 21:50, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, then may I have an explanation for why another user's edits should be allowed to proceed while my own are not, in reference to the RfC? 129.97.125.3 (talk) 21:52, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Because you started changing things, and your changes were contested by two different editors. You should have stopped after three reverts--I think you got to eight. Also, you should have stopped because two different editors disagreed. Also, you should have stopped because of WP:BRD. And if you start editing this article from a different IP, I will block all those IPs, including this one, and I will lock the article. Drmies (talk) 22:08, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think I denied being that IP (in fact I actually implied it in some of my edit summaries). 129.97.125.3 (talk) 22:11, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think I suggested that you denied it, and I don't think it matters very much. Eight reverts--seriously. Drmies (talk) 01:17, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.