User talk:鶏肉が欲しい

April 2024[edit]

Hello, I'm Wiiformii. An edit that you recently made to Soil stabilization seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Wiiformii (talk) 00:49, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was fixing a typo 鶏肉が欲しい (talk) 02:36, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anthophobia (April 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Clearfrienda was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I think this could be considered notable in the future, but not at the moment. There's a Cleveland Clinic article and an obscure medical journal about it but that's it. There are plenty of pseudoscientific phobias documented online that simply don't warrant an encyclopedia page. I'd recommend merging this into another article like List of phobias or trying to improve your references and resubmitting.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anthophobia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Clear friend a ^💬 02:39, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 鶏肉が欲しい! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Clear friend a ^💬 02:39, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Descriptive adjectives[edit]

Hi, I see you've removed adjectives, such as at Alcea apterocarpa, in the belief that Wikipedia is not allowed to express any opinion.

The rule applies only to the personal opinions of editors.

It is perfectly in order, indeed necessary, for articles to state that a plant is tall or that a mobile is pocket-sized. This is a straightforward description and it can be supported as usual by a citation to a reliable source. You will note that the lead section is just a summary of the article body, so we normally do not repeat citations up there. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:42, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]