User talk:İnfoCan

This page may contain some text written in the Turkish language.

Welcome to Wikipedia from Marek69[edit]

Hi, İnfoCan. I welcome you to Wikipedia! Thank you for all of your edits. I hope you like editing here and being part of Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); when you save the page, this will turn into your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or put {{helpme}} (and what you need help with) on your talk page and someone will show up very soon to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Marek.69 ^talk 17:23, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Halys[edit]

Good sleuth work on the Battle of Halys talk page.--Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 18:19, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 758d615710086be73aa933d290c403d7[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account! —Preceding unsigned comment added by InfoCan (talk • contribs) 16:10, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Puppets[edit]

Hey Can, as far as I know, you are one of the specialists on investigation of sockpuppets in Turkish Wikipedia. If you are interested in this case, please participate by going here and adding your comments. Thank you. Takabeg (talk) 05:38, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hatt-ı Hümayun[edit]

Hi Takabeg. The article Hatt-ı Hümayun is ambiguously named and will have to be renamed. I am working on an article on the technical meaning of "Hatt-ı Hümayun" at User:İnfoCan/work. I am confused by one topic. Would you happen to know why the 1856 edict is called the Hatt-ı Hümayun? Did the sultan handwrite it himself? Or am I misunderstanding something? --İnfoCan (talk) 06:31, 4 December 2010 (UTC)--İnfoCan[reply]

Hatti-Humayun (about technical meaning of Hatt-ı hümayûn) diye bir madde varmış. 1856 yılınki, 18 Şubat 11 Cumâda-l âhire, Pazartesi Gülhâne Hattının ahkâmını te'yid ve tevsî' eden Istlâhat Hattı-ı Hümâyûnu. Yani kısaca "Islâhat Hatt-ı Hümâyûnu" veya "Islâhat Fermânı". Takabeg (talk) 06:42, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mevcut Hatt-ı Hümayun maddesinin başlığı uygunsuz olabilir. Takabeg (talk) 06:43, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tamam da, eğer 'hatt-ı hümayun', padişahın eliyle yazdığı bir resmi evrak demekse, Islahat hatt-ı hümayun denmesinin nedeni, onun tamamını eliyle yazdığı için mi? Yoksa bir katibe yazdırılmış da Padişah kenarına bir not mu düşmüş? Metnin sonunda Sadrazamına emir veriyor, bu kuralları uygulatacaksın diye, o yüzden mi? Onu merak ediyorum, İnternet'te bulamadım. Bu konuda elinde basılı kaynak var mı? --İnfoCan (talk) 13:57, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A. Alâaddin Çetin, Başbakanlık Arşivi, Başbakanlık Arşivi Kılavuzu, Enderun Kitabevi, 1979, p. 12. nasıl ? Takabeg (talk) 14:05, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orada yazan benim için yeni değil, zaten o bilgiyi yazdım User:İnfoCan/work'te. Benim sorum özellikle Islahat fermanı hakkında, onun neden "Islahat hatt-ı hümayunu" olarak adlandırıldığını merak ediyorum. Yani acaba "beyaz üzerine hatt-ı hümayun" muymuş, yoksa "unvanına hatt-ı hümayun" muymuş? --İnfoCan (talk) 16:17, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

İstediğin Nitekim 1856 de ilân edilen Islahat Fermanı; Âli Paşa ile istanbul'daki Fransız ve ingiliz elçileri tarafından hazırlandı. İsmail Hakkı Uzunçarşılı, Enver Ziya Karal, Osmanlı Tarihi, 6. Cilt, p. 23. mü ? Takabeg (talk) 16:32, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorumun cevabını buldum [1]. --İnfoCan (talk) 22:36, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

İyi. Sevindim. Bire biraz alakasız konu olacak ama hazırladığın metinde yer alan Kaymakam Mısır'da albay için mi kullanıldı mı ? Türkiye'de yarbay için kullanıldı da... Takabeg (talk) 22:57, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kaymakam maddesindeki "lieutenant colonel" Türkçe yarbay demek [2]. Albay nerden çıktı? Osmanlıcadaki anlamı da yarbay [3]. --İnfoCan (talk) 01:49, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Maddenin üstte sağdaki tabloya, U.S. Army equivalents'e baktın mı ? Colonel diyor. Tablo doğru mu ? Takabeg (talk) 02:10, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yanlış olmalı. --İnfoCan (talk) 22:51, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bitti: Hatt-i humayun (government document).

Ayrıca Template_talk:Did_you_know#Hatt-i_humayun_.28government_document.29 olarak aday gösterdim.

--İnfoCan (talk) 22:54, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Eline sağlık. Takabeg (talk) 00:26, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Iraqi Turkmens[edit]

Can, if you have a time, please control sources. Bence böylece madde daha da taraflılaştırılıyor. Açıkça söylemem gerekirse, bariz bir şekilde Vikiyi Türk millî propagandanın aleti olarak kullananıyorlar. Thank you. Takabeg (talk) 12:09, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I found this article in the Wayback Machine, the arguments it makes against the pro-Turkoman/Turkish numbers (in the References and footnotes section at the end) are interesting. Following WP:NPOV, in controversial cases such as this we need to present and discuss all claims. --İnfoCan (talk) 21:11, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merci. But nationalists cannot accept alternatives. Demirci, Hürzümlü, Oğuzlu hepsi Türk. Oğuzlu'nun güzel tarafı 312-313 sayfalarında According to Demirci and many other Turkish and Turkoman scholars the, In Demirci’s study' şeklinde alıntı yapabilmesi. p. 87 1957 sayımının ilk resmi sonuçlarõna göre 136 800 Türk bölgede yaşamaktaydı. Irak hükûmeti gayrı-Arap unsurları düşük göstermeye çalışmış olabilir (büyük ihtimalle öyledir) ama 1957 Census dediğimiz zaman ilk olarak bunu gösgerdikten sonra ilaveten diğer görüşler (mesela Demirci'nin iddiası)in eklenmesi doğru ve normaldir. Değil mi ? Takabeg (talk) 21:46, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ganbot hakkında hatt-ı hümayun[edit]

File:Ii-abdulhamidin-hatti.jpg hatt-ı hümayununu okudun mu? Padişah'ın isteği yerine getirilmiş midir acaba? :-)

--İnfoCan (talk) 13:40, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of gunboats of the Ottoman Empire'ya baktığım kadarıyla 1893 veya 1894'de sipariş verilen bot görünmüyor. Bulursam seni haberdar edeceğim. Takabeg (talk) 13:57, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Birde buna baktın mı ? Sistemik önyargı olsa da bu kadar olur mu ? Takabeg (talk) 15:36, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Osmanlıca?[edit]

Arapça harfleri okuyabiliyor musun? Hatt-i humayun (government document) maddesinin tepesindeki resmin açıklaması doğru mu? --İnfoCan (talk) 20:51, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Arap harfleri okurum da manuscriptler bana zor geliyor. Belki bu kullanıcı rahatlıkla okuyabilir. Takabeg (talk) 21:28, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kaynak olarak kullanılan siteye baktım. Ona göre,

Mansûrum olmuştur.

İşbu hülâsada inhâ ve sürhde beyân olduğunu vechile zikr olunan hitâbetler tevcîhâtının icrâsına ve müceddeden minber vaz'ıyla ikâme-i

salât-ı Cum'a ve ıydına ibtidâr olunsun.

Fakat Eid ile alakalı mı gerçekten ?

Bu yazı 18 January 1860 tarihinde yazıldıysa......

1860 yılının Eid ul-Fitr (Ramazan Bayramı) bayağı ileride

Ramazan ayının son günü = Rumi 9 April 1276, Miladi 21 April 1860.

Aynı yılın Eid al-Adha (Kurban Bayramı) taaa ileride

Zilhicce ayının onuncu günü = Rumi 17 June 1276, Miladi 29 June 1860.

İlla Eid'de mi sür'atle başlayacak ? Belki öyledir de

... vazia ikâme-i salât-ı Cum'a va'idi ibtidâr olunsun. olabilir mi ?

Takabeg (talk) 05:11, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Transkripsiyon yanlış yapılmış olabilir, iyi düşündün, ama "va'id"in anlamını [4] bu cümleye oturtamıyorum. --İnfoCan (talk) 14:33, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

salât-ı cum'a ve salât-ı îdeyn diye bir tabir varmış.

burada da ikame-i salât-i Cuma ve ideyni...

Takabeg (talk) 15:34, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yani bayram namazı demek [5], değil mi? --İnfoCan (talk) 16:18, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

İki bayramın. Takabeg (talk) 16:21, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Hatt-i humayun (government document)[edit]

On 10 December 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Hatt-i humayun (government document), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that during the creation of the Ottoman Archives in the 19th century, hatt-i humayuns were cut out from their documents without cross-referencing, resulting in great loss of information to historians? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Hello, İnfoCan. You have new messages at Nedim Ardoğa's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Mustafa[edit]

Can. Sende Mustafa var mı ? Ve görüntü dosyalarından iyi anlar mısın ? Mümkünse o belgeselin 1:04:18 - 1:04:51 kısmını (Nureddin, Mustafa Kemal, Kâzım Karabekir ve Fevzi) kesip düzelttikten sonra Commons'a yükleyebilir misin ? Zor bir iş mi acaba ?

Birde gemileri List of naval steamships of the Ottoman Empire, List of patrol vessels of the Ottoman Empire, List of miscellaneous naval ships of the Ottoman Empire olmak üzere üç listeye sıkıştırmıştım. Fakat sanki başlıkları uygunsuz (daha doğrusu ahenksiz) gibi. Önerin var mı ? List of major warships in the late Ottoman Empire (Navy). List of small warhips in the late Ottoman Empire. List of miscellaneous naval ships of the Ottoman Empire. Takabeg (talk) 09:14, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mustafa yok, Veda vereyim mi? :-) Aslında olsaydı dahi istediğini yapabileceğimden emin değilim, muhtemelen kopya kontrollüdür.

Gemi listelerini istersen Naval ship classes, Auxiliary Ships and Coast Guard gibi düzenleyebilirsin. Yani savaş amaçlı, savunma amaçlı ve destek gemiler. Eğer "Naval ship classes" fazla büyükse gemi tiplerine göre bölebilirsin, battleships, cruisers, destroyers, frigates gibi. Category:Lists of ships by country'ye baktın mı? --İnfoCan (talk) 14:21, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not:List_of_miscellaneous_naval_ships_of_the_Ottoman_Empire maddesindeki tabloları birleştireceksin değil mi? --İnfoCan (talk) 14:22, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Birleştirsek iyi olacak. Sınıflar olunca birleştirilemiyor da o listede yoktur herhalde. Ayrıca List of Turkish Navy ships'deki format ile hazırlayacağım. Takabeg (talk) 05:36, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bende hem Mustafa hem de Veda var. Ama tekniğim yok :( Takabeg (talk) 05:37, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bunu da bölsek mi ? Takabeg (talk) 12:45, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Anlamadım, bölmek değil silmek lazım o sayfayı. O sayfadaki her liste zaten Category:Turkish Navy lists ve Category:Lists of ships of Turkey 'e dahil, sayfanın var olması için bir neden yok.

Bölmüştüm ve o da kalıntı. Takabeg (talk) 17:51, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Diğer bir konu: Hatt-ı Hümayun of 1856'ya neden {{merge}} koydun? Tamamen farklı kavramlar, birleşmeleri için bir neden göremiyorum. --İnfoCan (talk) 17:38, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hatti-Humayun maddesi (çok kısa ama)nde de aynı şey anlatılıyor değil mi ? Birleştirildikten sonra Hatti-Humayun başlığının Hatt-ı Humayun maddesine yönlendirilmesi gerekiyor, bence. Takabeg (talk) 17:51, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pardon, haklısın. Hatti-Humayun maddesi ile Hatt-i humayun maddelerini karıştırdım. --İnfoCan (talk) 17:57, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cevap[edit]

Osmanlıca el yazması

Merhaba, nasılsınız? Umarım hâlâ bu diyarlara uğramaya vakit bulabiliyorsunuz. Yazmış olduğum Hatt-i humayun (government document) maddesinin tepesindeki resim açıklamasının doğru olduğundan emin olmak istiyorum, yardımcı olabilir misiniz? Belgede kırmızı mürekkeple yazılanların tamamı padişahın mı, yoksa eğik yazılı olan bölüm sadrazama mı ait? --İnfoCan (talk) 21:39, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merhabalar yazınıza çok geç cevap verdiğim için kusura bakmayın. Bahsettiğiniz resmin altındaki açıklayıcı yazı doğru. Belgenin üstündeki düz yazı padişahın yazısı. Köşedeki eğik yazı sadrazamın yazısı. Maddeye Osmanlıca yazılışını da ekledim. Türkiye Diyanet Vakfının yayınladığı beyaz renkli İslam Ansiklopedisinin 16. cildinin 485-488. sayfalarında Hatt-ı Hümayun maddesi var. Ayrıca madde sonunda bibliyografya var. Buradan da faydalanarak maddeyi zenginleştirebilirsiniz.

Çalışmalarınızda başarılar dilerim. --Tarih (talk) 17:04, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Hatt-i humayun[edit]

The article Hatt-i humayun you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Hatt-i humayun for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of said article. If you oppose this decision, you may ask for a reassessment. Jezhotwells (talk) 10:48, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your assessment of Hatt-i humayun, I appreciate the time and effort you put into it. I'll take care of the problems you listed and request a copy edit at WP:PR. --İnfoCan (talk) 22:55, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi[edit]

Hi InfoCan. How are you ? What do you think about the infobox of Talk:Occupation of Smyrna ? Takabeg (talk) 12:56, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Banna'i DYK[edit]

Greetings! I just reviewed your DYK nom. Everything seems to check out so congrats. --Al Ameer son (talk) 22:20, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! --İnfoCan (talk) 22:27, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for creating that article! Nice to see that redlink turn blue. --J N 466 19:15, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for noticing! --İnfoCan (talk) 22:54, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Banna'i[edit]

On 10 January 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Banna'i, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the medieval Islamic brickwork technique of banna'i was used to cover whole buildings with names of Allah, Muhammad and Ali? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Banna'i.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 08:02, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Girih[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Girih at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Antony–22 (^talk⁄_contribs) 21:02, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for 2-acylglycerophosphocholine‎[edit]

On 8 February 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 2-acylglycerophosphocholine‎, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that in humans, 1-lysolecithin can be hydrolyzed by ten different enzymes? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2-acylglycerophosphocholine‎.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:05, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Girih[edit]

On 13 February 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Girih, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that girih tiling patterns used by medieval Islamic artisans (example pictured) in some cases exhibited quasicrystalline tiling, five centuries before Penrose tilings were discovered in Europe? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Girih.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:27, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Silhouette of Venus 1769.jpg[edit]

Please see Talk:Transit of Venus#File:Silhouette of Venus 1769.jpg where I am asking about the removal of an image. Johnuniq (talk) 07:42, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

re GAN Hatt-i humayun[edit]

Hi,

I'm reviewing your GAN at Talk:Hatt-i humayun/GA2 Hope you don't mind if I copy edit a little (you can revert any changes I make that you don't like.) Feel free to ask me any questions or give me feedback.

Best wishes, MathewTownsend (talk) 19:35, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]