User:Val.delrio/sandbox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Culture shapes biology

There's been multiple studies focusing on the neurological difference between Asian and Western culture. Studies have repeatedly shown that westerners tend to be better at attention to detail, processing central objects, and organization through rules and categories. In contrast, Asian culture tends to focus more on context, relationship over category to items, and rely on instinct rather than logic. In one study Neurologists Han and Nothoff looked at activity in the medial prefrontal cortex and found that due to western culture being more individualistic are more likely to self-identify themselves as "I'm honest" vs Asians who tend to be more dependent and family oriented they would say "I'm honest when i'm with my mother". The same study found that when American's would identify themselves the ventral-medial pre-frontal cortex would activate in contrast to Asian's which it would activate when describing themselves both independently (I'm honest) and interdependently (I'm honest when I'm with my mother). Another study conducted by the same team focused on how the brain reacted to different languages. They found that due to the difference in language structure and representation, American's showed activation in the superior temporal gyrus while Chinese people showed activation in the dorsal extent of the inferior parietal lobule.[1]

A different study conducted by psychologist Joan Chiao found that due to cultural differences Americans are more likely to suffer of depression than Asians. She found that East Asians are more likely to carry the short allele of the serotonin transporter gene (STG) which leads to depression while Americans carry the long allele which doesn't lead to depression. Yet due to difference is culture structure they found that collectivist societies are more likely to find happiness than individual societies.[2]

Another study done by psychologist Nalini Ambady and Jonathan Freeman spoke of the difference in brain activity between Japanese and Americans when shown different body posture. They found that the reward circuitry in the limbic system would light up when Japanese participants would see submissive body posture while the reward circuitry would activate when american's would see dominant body posture.[3]

Culture Differences in Visual Stimuli

In a study conducted in 2005 they found that East Asians were more likely to keep their eyes focused on background scenes than westerners who would instead focus more on the central object such as a giraffe in a savanna. In a similar 2006 study it showed that in congruence to the difference in society structure westerners showed more activation in object processing regions, including the bilateral middle temporal gyrus, left superior parietal gyrus, and right superior temporal gyrus, although no activation differences were observed in context-processing regions such as the hippocampus. However there has been some research contradicting cultural bias in the oculomotor control such as one conducted in 2007 by Rayner, Li, Williams, Cave, and well who failed to find evidence that East Asians focus more on context although they did find evidence that they are more likely to focus less on central objects. In a different study they focused more on difference in attention towards faces. They proved that American's focus more broadly on the entire face such as both the eyes and mouth while Asians focus more on a single part such as only the mouth. The authors point out that this happens due to gaze avoidance in east Asian culture as a way of politeness. In another 2008 study focusing on context it showed that East Asians were more likely to include greater details and background when taking photographs of a model when they were free to set the zoom function of the camera as they saw fit. In 2003 a group of researchers used the Frame-Line Test and asked the participants to draw a line of either the exact same length as the one showed or one that was proportional in size. Americans were more accurate in the absolute task, suggesting better memory for the exact or absolute size of the focal object, but East Asians were more accurate in the relative (proportional) task, suggesting better memory for contextual relationships.In a later study conducted by the same group they found a pattern within the cultures when processing emotions. East Asians were less likely to know the difference between fear and disgust than Americans when sampling faces. [4]

Many studies conducted proves that constant repetition in a certain skill has an effect on brain activity. For example, in a 2000 study they showed that taxi drivers in London showed larger gray matter in the posterior hippocampi than the average civilian.[5] A different study in 2004 showed that those who know how to juggle have an increase in volume of the cortical tissue in the bilateral midtemporal area and left posterior intraparietal sulcus [6]

  1. REDIRECT Cultural neuroscience
  • From a page move: This is a redirect from a page that has been moved (renamed). This page was kept as a redirect to avoid breaking links, both internal and external, that may have been made to the old page name.
  1. ^ dlende (2008-08-14). "Cultural Neuroscience". Neuroanthropology. Retrieved 2016-11-08.
  2. ^ "'Culture of We' Buffers Genetic Tendency to Depression: Northwestern University News". www.northwestern.edu. Retrieved 2016-11-08.
  3. ^ "Your brain on culture". http://www.apa.org. Retrieved 2016-11-08. {{cite web}}: External link in |website= (help)
  4. ^ Park, Denise C.; Huang, Chih-Mao (2010-07-01). "Culture Wires the Brain: A Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective". Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science. 5 (4): 391–400. doi:10.1177/1745691610374591. ISSN 1745-6916. PMC 3409833. PMID 22866061.
  5. ^ Maguire, Eleanor A.; Woollett, Katherine; Spiers, Hugo J. (2006-01-01). "London taxi drivers and bus drivers: a structural MRI and neuropsychological analysis". Hippocampus. 16 (12): 1091–1101. doi:10.1002/hipo.20233. ISSN 1050-9631. PMID 17024677.
  6. ^ Driemeyer, Joenna; Boyke, Janina; Gaser, Christian; Büchel, Christian; May, Arne (2008-07-23). "Changes in Gray Matter Induced by Learning—Revisited". PLoS ONE. 3 (7). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002669. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 2447176. PMID 18648501.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)