User:MaxnaCarta/PROD log

PROD log

July 2022

1. Ontario Telemedicine Network: PROD; notified Dtolj (talk · contribs) 11:35, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Does not meet general notability guideline or the specific notability standard set out in NCORP.
2. Snickers (workwear): PROD; notified Rwxrwxrwx (talk · contribs) 11:16, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Does not meet GNG or the specifics laid out in WP:NCORP - article is 13 years old yet is completely unsourced. No secondary sources appear to exist. Issues have not been been addressed since maintenance tags placed in 2009.
3. Miyazawa Flutes: PROD 06:13, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: G11 - Unambiguous promotion - discuss how it's a new system in history, and most of the article content is in Models and Brogger system which advertise the product's difference to competitors. Has had advertising tag for 13 years without addressing issues, article would need to be totally re-written/stubbed to be non promotional. (This was previously CSD'd many years ago, I checked and only PROD has policy on one time only)
4. Ars Nova Singers: PROD; notified Ars Nova Singers (talk · contribs) 09:18, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Article created by its subject, and has had unaddressed maintenance templates since 2009. In March of this year, another editor identified the article does not meet WP:GNG and relies on primary sources. This continues to be the case. Given the subject does not meet WP:GNG or NMUSIC, the poor quality of the article is unable to be addressed as no amount of editing will overcome the lack of notability. Given the lack of sourcing, the articles contents largely also can not meet verifiability guidelines either.
5. United States Distance Learning Association: PROD; notified Amlife (talk · contribs) 12:49, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Promotional article of organisation that does not meet the notability standards at WP:NCORP. Tagged as advertising in 2009 - little to no improvement to address concerns since then. No reliable secondary sources covering the subject in a significant way.
6. Control Module Industries: PROD; notified Greenthoughts (talk · contribs) 01:59, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Promotional article on a subject that does not meet NCORP. Sources within article are primary, nothing available to demonstrate significant, in-depth coverage on this business. PRODing as likely to be uncontroversial, article creator's only edit is to create this business page, no significant edits have been made in 13 years, mostly maintenance edits rather than anything of substance. Been tagged as advertising since 2009, and while not exclusively promotional, due to lack of notability a clean-up and re-write is not worth it.

October 2022

1. Kenneth Thexeira: PROD; notified Blueberrysrinivas (talk · contribs) 08:49, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: This wrestling organisation does not meet the standard of notability set out in NCORP. This criteria states that significant coverage addressing the subject directly and in depth is required. Almost all sources both within the article and online contain only brief, passing mentions. Most sources available only briefly mention the name of the organisation in discussion of a wrestler currently associated with the organisation.
2. Anthony Wayne Johnson: PROD; notified Loudsurer (talk · contribs) 01:18, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Does not meet the general notability or subject specific guideline.
3. Vidgo: PROD; notified TheMediaHistorian (talk · contribs) 02:42, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Does not meet notability for companies/products set out in NCORP. Little to no coverage out there, article is sourced only with primary sources, likely because there is nothing secondary out there.
4. Werner Merzbacher: BLP PROD; notified Theanonymoustypist (talk · contribs) 00:33, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

December 2022

1. Bahamian Brewery and Beverage Co: PROD; notified Candleabracadabra (talk · contribs) 23:57, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Article does not meet NCORP - the only significant coverage is a marketing piece in the Bahamas Weekly, and as this is written by a marketer it is not independent. With no significant coverage that is independent of the subject, notability standard for companies is not met.