User:JonMcDonald/history

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

History[edit]

The institution of marriage in Japan has changed radically over the last millennium. Indigenous practices adapted first to Chinese Confucianism during the medieval era, and then to Western concepts of individualism, gender equality, romantic love, and the nuclear family during the modern era. Customs once exclusive to a small aristocracy gained mass popularity as the population became increasingly urbanized.

Heian period (794–1185)[edit]

Genji's son Yūgiri (夕霧, "Evening Mist") reads a letter. Genji Monogatari Emaki, 12th century handscroll, Gotoh Museum.

The Heian period of Japanese history marked the culmination of its classical era, when the vast imperial court established itself and its culture in Heian-kyō (modern Kyoto). Heian society was organized by an elaborate system of rank, and the purpose of marriage was to produce children who would inherit the highest possible rank from the best-placed lineage. It was neither ceremonial nor necessarily permanent.[1] Aristocrats exchanged letters and poetry for a period of months or years before arranging to meet after dark. If a man saw the same woman for a period of three nights, they were considered married, and the wife's parents held a banquet for the couple. Most members of the lower-class engaged in a permanent marriage with one partner, and husbands arranged to bring their wives into their own household, in order to ensure the legitimacy of their offspring. High-ranked noblemen sometimes kept multiple wives or concubines. Aristocratic wives could remain in their fathers' house, and the husband would recognize paternity with the formal presentation of a gift.[2]

The forms of Heian courtship, as well as the pitfalls of amorous intrigue, are well represented in the literature of the period, especially The Tale of the Bamboo Cutter, The Sarashina Diary, The Pillow Book, and The Tale of Genji.

Edo period (1600-1868)[edit]

"Wedding." From the book Japan and Japanese (1902), p. 62.
"Japanese at home." From the book Japan and Japanese (1902), p. 71.

In pre-modern Japan, marriage was inextricable from the ie (, "family" or "household"), the basic unit of society with a collective continuity independent of any individual life. Members of the household were expected to subordinate all their own interests to that of the ie, with respect for an ideal of filial piety and social hierarchy that borrowed much from Confucianism.[3] The choice to remain single was the greatest crime a man could commit, according to Baron Hozumi.[4] Marriages were duly arranged by the head of the household, who represented it publicly and was legally responsible for its members, and any preference by either principal in a marital arrangement was considered improper. Property was regarded to belong to the ie rather than to individuals, and inheritance was strictly agnatic primogeniture. A woman (女) married the household (家) of her husband, hence the terms yome (, "wife") and yomeiri (嫁入り, "marriage," lit. "wife entering").[5] In the absence of sons, some households would adopt a male heir (養子, or yōshi) to maintain the dynasty, a practice which continues in corporate Japan.[6]

Marriage was restricted to households of equal social standing (分限), which made selection a crucial, painstaking process. Although Confucian ethics encouraged people to marry outside their own group, limiting the search to a local community remained the easiest way to ensure an honorable match. Approximately one-in-five marriages in pre-modern Japan occurred between households that were already related.[1] Outcast communities such as the Burakumin could not marry outside of their caste, and marriage discrimination continued even after an edict abolished the caste system 1871, well into the twentieth century. Marriage between a Japanese and non-Japanese person was not officially permitted until 14 March 1873, a date now commemorated as White Day, although marriage with a foreigner required the Japanese national to surrender his or her social standing.

Caught in the Act, hanging scroll by the Kanbun Master, late 1660s, Honolulu Museum of Art.

The purposes of marriage in the medieval and Edo periods was to form alliances between families, to relieve the family of its female dependents, to perpetuate the family line, and, especially for the lower classes, to add new members to the family's workforce. The seventeenth-century treatise Onna Daigaku ("Greater Learning for Women") instructed wives honor their parents-in-law before their own parents, and to be "courteous, humble, and conciliatory" towards their husbands.[7] Husbands were also encouraged to place the needs of their parents and children before those of their wives. One British observer remarked, "If you love your wife you spoil your mother's servant."[8] The tension between a housewife and her mother-in-law has been a keynote of Japanese drama ever since.

Romantic love (愛情, aijō) played little part in medieval marriages, as emotional attachment was considered inconsistent with filial piety. A proverb said, "Those who come together in passion stay together in tears."[9] For men, sexual gratification was seen as separate from conjugal relations with one's wife, where the purpose was procreation. The genre called Ukiyo-e (浮世絵, lit. "floating world pictures") celebrated the luxury and hedonism of the era, typically with depictions of beautiful courtesans and geisha of the pleasure districts. Concubinage and prostitution were common, public, relatively respectable, until the social upheaval of the Meiji Restoration put an end to feudal society in Japan.[10]

Meiji Restoration and Modernization (1868-1945)[edit]

The Shōwa Emperor (Hirohito) with his wife Empress Kōjun and their children in 1941.

During the Meiji period, upper class and samurai customs of arranged marriage steadily replaced the unions of choice and mutual attraction that rural commoners had once enjoyed. Rapid urbanization and industrialization brought more of the population into the cities, ending the isolation of rural life. Public education became almost universal between 1872 and the early 1900s, and schools stressed the traditional concept of filial piety, first toward the nation, second toward the household, and last of all toward a person's own private interests. Marriage under the Meiji Civil Code required the permission of the head of a household (Article 750) and of the parents for men under 30 and women under 25 (Article 772).[11]

In arranged marriages, most couples met beforehand at a formal introduction called an omiai (お見合い, lit. "looking at one another"), although some would meet for the first time at the wedding ceremony. A visitor to Japan described the omiai as "a meeting at which the lovers (if persons unknown to each other may be so styled) are allowed to see, sometimes even to speak to each other, and thus estimate each others' merits."[12] However, their objections carried little weight. The meeting was originally a samurai custom which became widespread during the early twentieth century, when commoners began to arrange marriages for their children through a go-between (仲人, , nakōdo) or matchmaker. The word omiai is still used to distinguish arranged marriages, even when no formal meeting takes place, from ren'ai (恋愛, a "love match").[13]

Courtship remained rare in Japan at this period. Boys and girls were separated in schools, in cinemas, and at social gatherings. Colleagues who began a romantic relationship could be dismissed, and during the Second World War traveling couples could be arrested. Parents sometimes staged an arranged marriage to legitimize a "love match," but many others resulted in separation and sometimes suicide.[14] Love was thought to be inessential to marriage. A proposal by Baron Hozumi, who had studied abroad, that the absence of love be made a grounds for divorce failed to pass during debates on the Meiji Civil Code of 1898.[15] One writer observed in 1930, "According to the traditional moral ideas, it is deemed a sign of mental and moral weakness to 'fall in love.'"[16]

Marriage, like other social institutions of this period, emphasized the subordinate inferiority of women to men. Women learned that as a daughter they ought to obey their father, as a wife their husband, as a widow their sons. Chastity in marriage was expected for women, and a law not repealed until 1908 allowed a husband to kill his wife and her lover if he found them in an adulterous act. The prostitution of women survived the periodic intrusion of puritanical ideals.[17]

Divorce laws become more equal over time. During the Edo period, a husband could divorce his wife by writing a letter of his intent to do so, but a wife's only recourse was to flee to a convent. The laws of the early Meiji period established several grounds on which a man could divorce: sterility, adultery, disobedience to parents-in-law, loquacity, larceny, jealousy, and disease. A wife, accompanied by a close male relative, could appeal for divorce if she had been deserted or imprisoned by her husband, or if he was profligate or mentally ill. The 1898 Civil Code established the principle of mutual consent, although the consent of women was still likely to be forced until the early twentieth century, as women gradually gained access to education and financial independence.[18] The fight for divorce rights marked the beginning of Japanese feminism.

Post-war period (1945-)[edit]

Signed after the surrender and occupation of Japan by Allied forces, Article 24 of the Constitution of 1947 reestablished marriage on grounds of equality and choice:

Marriage shall be based only on the mutual consent of both sexes and it shall be maintained through mutual cooperation with the equal rights of husband and wife as a base. With regard to choice of spouse, property rights, inheritance, choice of domicile, divorce and other matters pertaining to marriage and the family, all laws shall be enacted from the standpoint of individual dignity and the essential equality of the sexes.
A family meal in the 1950s.

The Constitution abolished the foundations of the ie system and the patriarchal authority at its heart. Each nuclear family retained, and still retains, a separate family registration sheet, initiated on marriage, and couples gained the right to take on the surname of the husband or wife. All legitimate children, male or female, gained an equal right to inheritance, putting an end to primogeniture succession and the obsession with lineage. Women received the right to vote and the right to request a divorce on the basis of infidelity. The Meiji emphasis on Confucian values and national mythology disappeared from education.[19] The conventional model of the ie was replaced with a new convention, the kazoku (家族, family) and the kakukazoku (核家族, nuclear family), as the fundamental unit of society.[20]

New demographic trends emerged, including a later age of marriage and a smaller difference in age between groom and bride,[21] the birth of two children in quick succession, few children born out of wedlock, and a low divorce rate.[22] Lifetime employment became the norm for Japanese men, especially during the post-war economic boom of the 1950s, 60s, and 70s. A middle-class ideology established a gendered family pattern with a salaried husband to provide the family income, a housewife to manage the home and nurture the children, and a commitment by the children to education. Better health and nutrition meant a rapid extension of life expectancy, and government policies have encouraged people to form three-generation families (三世代家族, sansedai kazoku) to manage a rapidly aging society.[20]

Omiai marriages, arranged either by an intermediary or a matchmaking service, remained the norm immediately after the war, although the decades which followed saw a steady rise in the number of ren'ai "love matches." Today only 5.2% of married couples describe their marriage as arranged, according to a 2010 survey, and a courtship of several years has become the norm even for relationships that begin with an omiai. More than 60% of "love match" couples meet in the workplace or through friends or siblings.[23]

  1. ^ a b "Society: Marriage in Japan". Japan Reference. 4 March 2013. Retrieved 21 January 2016.
  2. ^ Kurihara, Hiromu (1999). Heian-jidai no Rikon no Kenkyu. Tokyo: Kobundo.
  3. ^ Hendry, Marriage in Changing Japan, pp. 15-6.
  4. ^ Hozumi, Nobushige. Ancestor-Worship and Japanese Law. University Press of the Pacific, 2003. ISBN 1-4102-0838-9.
  5. ^ Hendry, Marriage in Changing Japan, pp. 15-6.
  6. ^ Kapur, Roshni (17 January 2016). "Welcome to the family: Adult adoptions in corporate Japan". Rappler. Retrieved 19 January 2016.
  7. ^ Hendry, Marriage in Changing Japan, pp. 18, 22.
  8. ^ Sladen, Douglas; Lorimer, Norma (1904). More Queer Things About Japan. London: Anthony Treherne. p. 384.
  9. ^ Tamura, The Japanese Bride, p. 3.
  10. ^ Hendry, Marriage in Changing Japan, pp. 19-21. Fukutake, Japanese Rural Society, p. 44.
  11. ^ Hendry, Marriage in Changing Japan, pp. 14, 16-7, 22-3.
  12. ^ Chamberlain, Basil Hall (1902). Things Japanese (4th ed.). London: John Murray. p. 309.
  13. ^ Hendry, Marriage in Changing Japan, pp. 18, 22-3.
  14. ^ Hendry, Marriage in Changing Japan, pp. 24-5.
  15. ^ West, Mark D. (2011). Lovesick Japan: Sex, Marriage, Romance, Law. Cornell University Press. p. 183.
  16. ^ Kawashima, Kekkon, pp. 143f.
  17. ^ Hendry, Marriage in Changing Japan, p. 21
  18. ^ Hendry, Marriage in Changing Japan, pp. 21-2
  19. ^ Hendry, Marriage in Changing Japan, pp. 26-8
  20. ^ a b Kelly, William. "Finding a Place in Metropolitan Japan: Transpositions of Everyday Life." Ed. Andrew Gordon. Postwar Japan as History. University of California Press, 1993. P. 208-10.
  21. ^ E-Stat (3 September 2015). "Trends in mean age of bride and groom at marriage and difference in mean age between bride and groom". Vital Statistics of Japan. Table 9-12. Retrieved 21 January 2016.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: location (link)
  22. ^ Coleman, Samuel. "The Tempo of Family Formation." Ed. David W. Plath. Work and Lifecourse in Japan. Albany: SUNY Press, 1983. P. 183-214.
  23. ^ IPSS, "Marriage Process and Fertility of Japanese Married Couples" (2011), table 1.1, 1.3.