User:FastLizard4/RFA Votes
Please don't edit this page. Thanks.
RfA Votes[edit]
Key:
-- Support
-- Oppose
-- Neutral
-- Asked question
-- Commented
-- Withdrawn (generally by WP:SNOW)
-- Unsuccessful (not withdrawn, however)
-- Successful
-- I nominated
Stormtracker94 (2) -- Stormtracker94 (talk · contribs · count · logs · block log · lu · rfas · rfb · arb · rfc · lta · socks) -- Details
Chris G (3) -- Chris G (talk · contribs · count · logs · block log · lu · rfas · rfb · arb · rfc · lta · socks) -- Chris G (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) -- Details
Wenli -- Wenli (talk · contribs · count · logs · block log · lu · rfas · rfb · arb · rfc · lta · socks) -- Details
Details[edit]
- Stormtracker94 (2): Oppose -- I don't think that 3 months is a long enough experience span, and I am moved to oppose by the candidates lack of answers to questions 4-7. --FastLizard4 (Talk•Links•Sign) 04:11, 23 October 2007 (UTC) Links for this user: Stormtracker94 (talk · contribs · count · logs · block log · lu · rfas · rfb · arb · rfc · lta · socks)
- Chris G (3): Support -- Has close to 1,000 mainspace edits (good enough for me) and runs 3 bots, this would seem to indicate trust by the community; no blocks; and seems to be an all-around good guy. Like his responses to the questions, probably would make a good administrator. --FastLizard4 (Talk•Links•Sign) 06:36, 27 October 2007 (UTC) Links for this user: Chris G (talk · contribs · count · logs · block log · lu · rfas · rfb · arb · rfc · lta · socks) -- Chris G (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
- FINAL (65/1/0); Ended Sat, 03 Nov 2007 05:10 (UTC)
- Wenli: Question 6: -- What are your opinions about Wikipedia's recent move to allow anons to create pages? FastLizard4 (Talk•Links•Sign) 03:29, 29 October 2007 (UTC) Links for this user: Wenli (talk · contribs · count · logs · block log · lu · rfas · rfb · arb · rfc · lta · socks)
- Answer -- I believe that anonymous users are not allowed to create pages, as described at Wikipedia:Articles for creation.
- Support -- Wenli has enough edits to satisfy my tastes, and seems to be trusted by the community. --FastLizard4 (Talk•Links•Sign) 04:00, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
- FINAL (19/15/4); Ended Thu, 01 Nov 2007 01:59 (UTC)
AfD Votes[edit]
Key:
-- Keep
-- Delete
-- Neutral
-- Commented
-- Complex Result
-- Deleted
-- Kept
-- Withdrawn
-- I nominated
Marijuana etiquette (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) -- (View AfD) -- Details- United Federation of Planets (Star Fleet Universe) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) -- (View AfD) -- Details
Details[edit]
- Marijuana etiquette (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) -- (View AfD) (View log)
- It's not notable, it's unsourced and looks like it's made up by the author (to me, at least). At best, this should be merged into the article Marijuana. FastLizard4 (Talk•Links•Sign) 02:02, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
- The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 22:32, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- United Federation of Planets (Star Fleet Universe) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) -- (View AfD) (View log)
- Keep - It is not really the same thing as those other articles, and Speedy Keep because it has only been about a month since the last nomination, also, per ColonelWarden, needing cleanup is not the same as needing deletion. --FastLizard4 (Talk•Index•Sign) 03:10, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
- The result was keep. - JForget 00:40, 10 December 2007 (UTC)