User:Ergo Sum/sandbox/Food Marketing Institute v. Argus Leader Media

Food Marketing Institute v. Argus Leader Media
Food Marketing Institute v. Argus Leader Media
	Supreme Court of the United States
Argued April 22, 2019; Decided June 24, 2019
Full case name	Food Marketing Institute, Petitioner v. Argus Leader Media, DBA Argus Leader
Docket no.	18–481
Citations	588 U.S. ___ (more) 139 S. Ct. 2356; 204 L. Ed. 2d 742; 2019 U.S. LEXIS 4200; 2019 WL 2570624
Argument	Oral argument
Opinion announcement	Opinion announcement
Holding
	Where commercial or financial information is both customarily and actually treated as private by its owner and provided to the government under an assurance of privacy, the information is “confidential” within [FOIA] Exemption 4’s meaning.
Court membership
	Chief Justice John Roberts Associate Justices Clarence Thomas · Ruth Bader Ginsburg; Stephen Breyer · Samuel Alito; Sonia Sotomayor · Elena Kagan; Neil Gorsuch · Brett Kavanaugh
Case opinions
Majority	Gorsuch, joined by Roberts, Thomas, Alito, Kagan, Kavanaugh
Concur/dissent	Breyer, joined by Ginsburg, Sotomayor
Laws applied
	Freedom of Information Act

Food Marketing Institute v. Argus Leader Media, 588 U.S. ___ (2019), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that

Background[edit]

Text of Food Marketing Institute v. Argus Leader Media, 588 U.S. ___ (2019) is available from: Justia Oyez (oral argument audio)