User:Cmdrjameson/archive1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Here are some tips to help you get started:

Spelling Corrections

I see that you've made some spelling corrections on some of the articles I've created, great job! I'm inviting you to look over my article Military History of Puerto Rico. If you do, feel welcome to fix any misspelled words that you find. Take care. Tony the Marine

DANFS says "USS Emmigrant": http://www.history.navy.mil/danfs/e3/emmigrant.htm It's possible that DANFS is misspelling the name, but it seems more likely that the error was made in the naming of the actual ship. —wwoods 02:12, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Your edits are well-received.

That's a pun, because you've been picking up all my mis-spellings of receiving (it just pours out wrong when I type). Thanks for your work! -- BD2412 thimk 04:24, 2005 May 4 (UTC)

Star Wars Wiki

I have noticed your contributions to Star Wars articles, and I thought you might be interested in the Star Wars Wiki project. We could use new Star Wars contribs like yourself helping the cause. Take a look, and I hope to see you there. Cheers! --SparqMan 21:28, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Bruno Faidutti

Hi. I would like to draw your attention to Bruno Faidutti, on which you have made a couple of edits recently. On this page, Millenium is not a spelling error but the name of a French game publisher.

I think you're doing a great job tidying up Wikipedia, thanks. --Millsdavid 04:14, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Is thru a spelling mistake?

Thanks for checking the speling on History of West Eurasia. As my spelling is not too hot I need that kind of help. However, thru is in my dictionary so does it really count as a spelling mistake? It also, not that that is too relevant, is how we actually say the word.

My dictionacy is the Oxford Dictionary of Current English and it is list as "Am var. of through". Lite by contrast is not listed at all. Thru is quite common on Wikki as you yourself have clearly checked so for quite a few it is formal enough for an encyclopedia. It's true that it is much less common in formal contexts but when I did a search on "thru" at alta vista I got 32 million and it wasn't difficult to find among them pages with very formal themes Embassies of other Nations to The United States - 34 Pages. PS sorry I forgot to sign it last time. Dejvid 21:39, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Yes, "thru" is an acceptable if minority American spelling; rather than anglify spellings — newbies are warned about correcting "honour" or "honor" (either one), else with the many backgrounds of people, we'd never stop revert wars — wouldn't it be best to contribute some substance, if you can? Bill 23:44, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Thank 'oo

Many thanks for your ceaseless spelling correction work, picking up my few erratic spelling ticks and British spellings. Since you don't already have such a thing, I think you deserve a barnstar of diligence --KharBevNor 11:52, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[sic]

Thank you for your many spelling corrections. Occasionally, however, things are misspelled on purpose. This is usually denoted by "sic" in square brackets immediately following the misspelling. The article about The South End deliberately misspelled the word "dissolved" because it copied it straight off a headline. (Although on the other hand, pointing out misspellings in a student paper might be considered petty, but that's another issue). Robert Happelberg 23:13, 21 July 2005 (UTC)

Reading spark plugs for racing

As you once editted the article, mind having a look at Wikipedia:Votes_for_undeletion#Reading_spark_plugs_for_racing? Thanks. Samw 14:16, 23 July 2005 (UTC)

Periodontal ligament

My spelling in that article was positively TERRIBLE... I was quite embarrassed when I saw all the mistakes you corrected, but I am very, very, very thankful. - Dozenist talk 15:18, 24 July 2005 (UTC)

Milton Keynes pronunciations

Perhaps it has always been wrong since someone did the IPA versions of the villages of Milton Keynes, but it is certainly wrong now. The essential point about the pronunciations of Broughton, Loughton and Woughton is that they are all each examples of the different pronunciations of OUGH in English. None are like "through"! Broughton is as "throw" (a stone), Loughton is as in "bough" (of a tree), Woughton is as in "enough" (I think it is correct as is). So if you speak IPA, a correction to at least the RP versions would welcome. If you can distinguish between the estuarine Os in throw and bough, I'll be ultra impressed. --Concrete Cowboy 23:20, 28 July 2005 (UTC)

Yes, I was afraid that that would be the case. Thanks anyway. --Concrete Cowboy 08:54, 29 July 2005 (UTC)

Primary candidates VFD

Many of the candidates for the June 14, 2005, congressional primary have been proposed for deletion. I am writing those who worked on election articles to request that they offer their votes against the proposal. The VFD's can be found starting at Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Log/2005_August_8#Peter_Fossett. It is my view that we ought to provide a complete record of the election and my deleting so called "minor" candidates we do a disservice to them and the historical record. Please vote against all these proposals.PedanticallySpeaking 14:54, August 9, 2005 (UTC)

Schmidt and Hackett

You worked on articles on the special election in Ohio on August 2. I have posted my articles on the nominees in that race, Jean Schmidt and Paul Hackett, at Wikipedia:Peer review and would appreciate your comments. The individual pages are at Wikipedia:Peer review/Jean Schmidt/archive1 and Wikipedia:Peer review/Paul Hackett/archive1. PedanticallySpeaking 19:31, August 17, 2005 (UTC)

Speedy spelling edits

Hi there... I just noticed from your contribution page that you're able to do a whole ton of spelling edits all at the same time. I'm envious! How do you do it? Do you run a bot? Or are you just superhuman? :) At any rate, fantastic work! -- Gsp 06:07, 22 August 2005 (UTC)

Thank you

I saw you caught a spelling error of mine on the "For Richer or for Poor" page. Thank you for fixing it.--Teri 01:28, 24 August 2005 (UTC)

Wikimedia UK/Wikimania 2006

Hi, this is a circular to Wikipedians in Ireland to draw your attention to Wikimedia UK, where the establishment of a local Wikimedia chapter for the United Kingdom (and possibly for the Republic of Ireland) is being discussed. See the talk page, as well as the mailing list; a meetup will take place to discuss matters in London in September, for anyone who can get there. On another topic, plans are being drawn up for a UK bid for Wikimania 2006, which would be conveniently close to Ireland. On the other hand, Dublin's bid was one of the final three last year - might we bid again? --Kwekubo 03:48, 31 August 2005 (UTC)

Science pearls

Hello,

Since you contributed in the past to the publications’ lists, I thought that you might be interested in this new project. I’ll be glad if you will continue contributing. Thanks,APH 11:35, 11 September 2005 (UTC)

Al Leong

Thanks for the corrections to the Al Leong article. It must have been really late when I typed that up. :) -- BBlackmoor (talk), 2005-11-12 T 15:43:51 Z

Please check discusion at the_eXile

Please check discusion at the_eXile Reputable and Reliable Source? 19:20, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

I think this editor is referring to Talk:The eXile.--Commander Keane 19:27, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

Thank You for Editing the PIA Page!!

Thank you for correcting lots of spelling mistakes on the page!!! Copy that what Millsdavid said above, you're doing a great job tidying up Wikipedia, Thanks.

Thessaloniki

Hi. Why did you just go through Thessaloniki and change all of the Markup Language special characters into non-markup characters? You may want to look at Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dashes), which explains what the special chars are, which ones to use, and why. Thanks. Good catch on the capitalization, by the way. Jkelly 23:19, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

No, no problem. I was sincerely curious since I tend to edit the opposite way, turning dashes into special chars. The only logic for doing that is for me to be sure about the difference between m and n dashes, a difference that isn't always obvious to me when they are rendered. Thanks for the good work with the script! Jkelly 23:40, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

MetaPost

Just noticed your edit to MetaPost tweaking the spelling of the MetaPost keyword "upto" to "up to". This change breaks my beautiful code samples. )-8 I'll assume that you were using an overzealous spellbot, and that you weren't displaying your ignorance of programming languages (ummm, yes, I have seen your homepage) Cheers, Andrew Kepert 00:43, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

Yeah, no probs. I just had that indignant "what f***ing ignoramus is messing with MY wikipedia page" feeling that sometimes comes from looking at watched pages. Then I realised that it wasn't a noobie and probably someone using a bot. But the good thing is that looking at your home page I discovered how to do babelboxes, so I have forgiven you. (-8 Try to get some work done on that PhD eh? When I were a lad (aka PhD student) I was fortunate enough not to have the web, let alone wp as a distraction. Andrew Kepert 01:16, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

Your edits

Hi Cm, I noticed your edits with the edit summary "unicodify" when removing mdash and ndash. Are you sure this is correct and are you preserving the n/m distinction? SlimVirgin (talk) 01:33, 26 November 2005 (UTC)

See Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(dashes)#Dash_guidelines_for_Wikipedia_editors. SlimVirgin (talk) 01:36, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
Hi, it looks like the en/em distinction is being preserved. What do you see as the advantage of changing the way they're currently written? SlimVirgin (talk) 02:01, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
I know that it's frowned upon by some, but I've never quite understood why. All I know is that we're supposed to edit in accordance with the MoS. Perhaps you could put a query on the relevant talk page at Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style_(dashes)? That's presumably where all the knowledgeable dash people hang out. ;-) SlimVirgin (talk) 02:31, 26 November 2005 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fern Ridge High School

Almost all the original content in Fern Ridge High School has been replaced, so it now bares little resemblance to the article you nominated. Also, this is a fairly unqiue school. I've found only about half a dozen articles that fit in the new Category:Alternative high schools (there's likely more, but not huge numbers, or they're not in Wikipedia yet). So, I was hoping you would re-read the article, and consider switching to a keep vote, based on the rewrite. --Rob 09:46, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

Roman Vishniac

Hey, just wanted to say thanks for the copyedit! -- Rmrfstar 23:57, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

Foo

Saw your edits on List of Shakespearean characters - all good - but I have a question. What does "collapse foo" mean in your edit summary? AndyJones 18:54, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

Thanks. AndyJones 19:12, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

neuropsychopharmacology edits

Hey! I just thought I'd commment on what a sharp eye you have, and thank you for the spelling corrections to the article neuropsychopharmacology I wrote a couple months ago. Incidentally, I see that your field is computer science. I recently downloaded VB.NET 2005 edition and began learning. I am vastly familiar with the old GW basic (yeah), and the tiny bit of assembly programming I did taught me rather efficiently to hate it. So I'm learning the latest VB.NET (no experience with regular VB), object-oriented programming, and event-driven protocol in one giant leap for man. Any comments or advice please drop a note. --RichG 13:48, 26 December 2005 (UTC)


Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Saint Patrick's Day Four

You made some edits to St patrick's four, thought you may want to know.Travb 05:12, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

Parker School Edits

Thanks for the spelling corrections on Francis W. Parker Charter Essential School. Its funny that articles about education would have spelling errors. Colby Peterson 03:40, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

Gold Prospectors Association of America

Appreciate the help with the article. You planning on hunting gold ? Found some "pickers", a few nuggets, two fossils. Imagine that you had found a 2lb. gold nugget. something like that could be worth several hundread $$$$ to several thousand $$$$. Cheers. :-)

Barnstar

Check out your userpage ^_^ Deckiller 03:16, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

Your welcome ^_^ Deckiller 19:18, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

thanks

Thanks mate...I didn't know that "targetted" was wrong! XYaAsehShalomX 10:04, 19 January 2006 (UTC)


Wikipedia:Meetup/Birmingham

This is just a reminder that the Birmingham meetup of UK Wikipedians that you have expressed an interst in is happening tomorrow. Sorry for the short notice. Thryduulf 15:23, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Spellchecking Comments...

Hey.

First of all, Thank you for spellchecking the Ribe Entry. There is one thing though: You've spellchecked the Comments as well... This wouldn't be much of a problem hadn't it been because part of the comments are not in English. Some of them are extract from the Danish Entry, waiting to be translated. Problem has it that they are much like english. So things like "i", "oktober", "og", etc... Should remain as is, otherwise it'll be hard to guess what was to be translated...

So anyhow, I guess I'm saying that you shouldn't spellcheck comments..


On the other hand I might be going against wiki-culture with non-english comments ?

User: Tanber (not logged in).

Thanks

Thanks for spell checking Optical Resolution. Ehusman 00:30, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

Just dropped by to thank you for "unicodifying" Tamil script. -- Sundar \talk \contribs 03:45, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

Please control your bot

Your bot simultaneously wrecked a bunch of examples about HTML entities at Help:Wiki markup examples by replacing them with Unicode. I'd suggest restricting your bot from editing the Help namespace.

Also, it seems to be changing things that are actually supposed to be italic and bold to be emphasized and strongly-emphasized. This showed up on the F = ma example, where the letters are made bold and italic as part of the mathematical formula, not for emphasis. You should be careful about this. rspeer / ɹəədsɹ 17:31, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

"Thru" in original caption: leave it if it's a direct quote

I disagree with your change of "thru" to "through" in Image:HitlerEagleNest45.jpg, since the "thru" you changed was a direct quote of the original caption. I reverted your change to restore the exact quote of the original caption. If you disagree or aren't sure why I reverted, I'd welcome discussion on the image talk page or my talk page. Cheers, -- Infrogmation 01:39, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

Resource fork

Hi, I see you added a cleanup tag to the page. Can you explain what you think needs cleaning up on the talk page there? While it's not prefect, it is better than many other articles I've seen that have had cleanup tags added. Graham 23:34, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

Amazon URLs

I am just curious on why you are removing all the amazon URLs. Jedi6 04:10, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for cleaning the amazon links --vineeth 05:28, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

More referral IDs

I think you might find some referral IDs in Barnes & Noble [1] links, they seem to have a referral program.

There's also NewEgg for articles on computer hardware, from what I gathered their referral links look like www.newegg.com/index.asp?refer=user .

My guess is that poker and gambling-related articles are probably also very likely to have referral links, although it'd be hard to weed them out automatically, so I might try to do that myself.

Obli (Talk) 23:02, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

re: AMG url cleanups

Hi there, I noticed you made some cleanups to the Tav Falco and his band's articles re: All Music Guide URLs in the References and Links sections. I looked to see the differences in the edits from the original and it seems you left the references and links wording intact but cleaned up the actual link to be a shorter URL, which is very helpful if I understand correctly what you did (no substance was removed, right?). Is this difference in URLs a matter of All Music Guide having changed their URL style recently? Or did you access the URLs a different way than I did? At first I thought when I read your edit summary that you'd "removed" the references, which was disconcerting (since I'd have had to put them back, particularly for a reference I consulted for source material), but it appears you merely tried to clean up an unnecessarily long URL, so thanks very much for the aid, assuming I understand correctly what the edits were. I hope to learn if I'm accessing AMG url's the wrong way for any future AMG references I add to any other articles as well. Your advice is appreciated on this subject. — Bebop 18:38, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

Hello. On the same subject, you edited the AMG url on the Grand Drive page to make it much shorter, but it actually links to the wrong page (a mistake on the part of the page originator I'm assuming). So how do I make this URL (the correct one) more compact? [2] — Hungoverdrawn 02:21, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

Actually, ignore me. I worked out how to do it by studying your example. You just remove the '&token' info and the tilde and anything after. Thanks. — Hungoverdrawn 02:25, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

Could you look through the database dump for these links?

Could you please look through the database for iTunes referral links?

Sample link:

http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewArtist?artistId=546381&originStoreFront=143456

Referral ID:

&originStoreFront=143456

Obli (Talk) 16:32, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

I guess that without a ref ID, the refereee is determined by which site the link was found at, then, so they're not going to be spammable anyway that way. Well, it's a good thing those six links aren't too much work to repair :) Obli (Talk) 23:50, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

Mermaid Avenue

I wanted to add something to the "Mermaid Avenue" page, but I don't know the correct manner and it said you were the last person to add anything so I looked you up. I just wanted to add to it that in "Chronicles: Volume One" Bob Dylan writes that Woody told him about the song lyrics, he went to the house but Woody's wife wasn't around. The child that was there looked at him suspiciously and Dylan got uncomfortable and ran off. Now that I think about it I'm not exactly certain if it was the wife who wasn't there or Woody's kid that looked at him funny, so best I didn't just half-ass it up onto the site. I thought some mention might be nice, though.

Please check your WP:NA entry

Greetings, editor! Your name appears on Wikipedia:List of non-admins with high edit counts. If you have not done so lately, please take a look at that page and check your listing to be sure that following the particulars are correct:

  1. If you are an admin, please remove your name from the list.
  2. If you are currently interested in being considered for adminship, please be sure your name is in bold; if you are opposed to being considered for adminship, please cross out your name (but do not delete it, as it will automatically be re-added in the next page update).
  3. Please check to see if you are in the right category for classification by number of edits.

Thank you, and have a wiki wiki day! BD2412 T 04:14, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

Seward Collins

Hello, hello! Say, I saw that you were one of the people who worked on the Seward Collins entry. I'm the Michael Tucker that's referenced at the end of the text and i'd love to touch base with whoever it was that did the piece. Would that be you? It would be great fun to share notes with someone who has actually heard of "poor Sewie," as his friends called him. --Mjt57 13:15, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

List of largest suspension bridges

I have reverted your changes. There was some bad edits before you made your changes that put the list out of order. The external links auto number the rank of the bridge. Wikilinks do not autonumber. There is no other method that I am aware of to autonumber a table. If you know of a better method to do what I've done, please let me know. --Samuel Wantman 01:09, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

List of Buffyverse-related topics

Heya, the URL links you changed were URL links to 'revision history' pages. That's because as far as I know that is the only way to link to 'history' pages. I'm sure you didn't mean to change the 'revision history' links to wikilinks to the main articles. Thanks -- Paxomen 17:57, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

Hi Paxomem,
I just had another look at my changes, and as far as I can see I've left any 'action' URLs (including revision history URLs) alone. I've only touched things such as http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Senior_Partners, which can be legitimately be turned into [[Senior Partners]].
My script also did things like remove unneeded spaces from [[foo |bar]] (turning it into [[foo|bar]]), which might be what you were seeing.
Or am I missing something? Cheers, Cmdrjameson 18:05, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
Heya, OK I see what happened, in a few places where there should have been a URL link to revision history (e.g. Buffy ep All the way) there was a URL link to the main article, and you wikified the link to the main article. The URL link was wrong in the first place, but I shall sort it out. Thanks for your help cleaning the list. -- Paxomen 18:16, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

Design Methods

Thanks for improving the details in design methods. It is appreciated. (67.173.159.109 20:24, 22 February 2006 (UTC))

Tourette syndrome

Thanks for the edits on the TS article! Sandy 22:57, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

Thank you

Thanks for spelling correction of the article Criticism of Islam. --Aminz 06:29, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

UC2

Thanks!
Good job on correcting those mistakes...that is why I needed it for a clean up.

To me...I counldn't see those mistakes:P

Seems to me it doesn't need clean up anymore:P I will check for other mistakes thanks again

>x<ino 13:12, 23 February 2006 (UTC)


Even more edits! Thanks for that

>x<ino 18:11, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Flamarande

I want to thank your corrections of the articles Western Roman Empire and Roman Republic. These corections are quite necessary if we are ever to get these articles as featured articles of Wikipedia. To give you even more work :) I am giving you a small list of articles which I am quite sure need and deserve your attention.

  1. Barcid
  2. Byzantine Empire This will be a monstrous task as this article is very big
  3. Derogatory use of "Byzantine"
  4. Foederati
  5. Herleva
  6. Historicity of Jesus
  7. Roman Empire
  8. Roman Empire/reorganization
  9. Roman Republic
  10. Roman citizen
  11. Romanization (cultural)
  12. SPQR If you know any italian could you please correct the italian phrases?
  13. Western Europe
  14. Western Roman Empire

A question: the word "squeesing" in the Roman Republic, shouldn´t it be "squeezing" ? Again, thank you for your hard work. Flamarande 00:03, 24 February 2006 (UTC) PS: Keep up the good work.

Italian is not the lanugage needed to translate SQPR - it is latin, and roughly translates to the senate and people of Romeold windy bear 22:59, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

Battle of Tours

Thanks for the positive editing on the Battle of Tours article. We have been trying, for over a year, to reach a consensus on that battle, what it meant to east and west. Generally, edits, unfortunately, have been unfailingly negative and vandalistic. Yours were correcting errors in grammer, structure and spelling, and the help much appreciated! old windy bear 01:16, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

User:Cmdrjameson Cheers to you also, and thanks again for the really excellent edits. I have worked nearly 7 months on this particular article, and will continue to polish it - with the help of folks like yourself! (As a historian, I get lost in the woods of the history timeline and forget the trees of the run-on sentences, which is where you are INVALUABLE!) I hope it is nominated. We, the group of people, Smerc, palmdogg, myself, yourself, who have worked on this article, have tried to make it, and it's sister article, (on Charles Martel), the best on the free net. A history prof at UMd told me this article was worthy of publication, so again, the work you did was appreciated, helpful, and meaningful! THANKS AGAIN, AND TAKE CARE! old windy bear 01:22, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

User:Cmdrjameson Once again, your positive edits touch work I have done, and I thank you. It is a breath of fresh air to get someone who uses their obvious intelligence and education to better articles, instead of cause difficulties...old windy bear 22:57, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

Symposium sp

thank you! I tried to avoid errors in my rewrite but i obviously didn't catch them all. sorry for making more work for you, but again, thanks. --Heah talk 00:20, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for spelling corrections

Thanks for spelling corrections on the criticism of organized nudism page. Dandelion1 03:47, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Among other things! And thank you for correcting mine as well. (84.193.174.98 12:28, 25 February 2006 (UTC))

Spelling

What is the point in changing Egyptian to Egytian...? bogdan 09:07, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

Edit summaries

I like your excellent edit summaries. Thanks, and keep up the good work! --HappyCamper 01:24, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

So do I and also appreciate the helpful spelling/typo corrections. Glad there's someone out there being more meticulous than I am! Thanks --Farsee50 09:52, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

An horse vs. a horse

Thanks for fixing the "an horse"→"a horse" etc. in the Hittites in the Bible page. However, it seems that those "errors" are in the King James Bible text itself, so perhaps we should not fix them. All the best, Jorge Stolfi 02:34, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Cmdrjameson/archive1&oldid=1158439819"