User:Cassiopeia/NPPS/Tbiw

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, welcome to your New Page Patrol School page! Every person I instruct will have their own page on which I will give them support and tasks for them to complete. Please make sure you have this page added to your watchlist. Your NPP School page has been specifically designed according to you and what you have requested instruction in - for that reason, please be as specific as possible when under my instruction, so that I know the best ways to help you (and do not be afraid to let me know if you think something isn't working).

Make sure you read through Wikipedia:Notability as that's the knowledge which most of the questions I ask you and tasks you do will revolve around.

How to use this page

This page will be built up over your time in the Academy, with new sections being added as you complete old ones. Each section will end with a task, written in bold type - this might just ask a question, or it might require you to go and do something. You can answer a question by typing the answer below the task; if you have to do something, you will need to provide diffs to demonstrate that you have completed the task. Some sections will have more than one task, sometimes additional tasks may be added to a section as you complete them. Please always sign your responses to tasks as you would on a talk page.

If both the instructor and student make completing the course curriculum a top priority, it will generally take around a month to go through the entirety of the curriculum. This pace is not required or necessarily expected, but rather is provided in order to give participants an idea of what to expect.

Notability[edit]

PART 1

When patrolling or reviewing an article, you may often come across articles do not meet the WP:N guidelines, but the editors make the edits in good faith. Please read WP:AGF and do not WP:BITE the new editors.

A. Notability is a test guidelines to decide whether a given topic warrants its own article in Wikipedia mainspace. Please read Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not, General Notability Guidelines, Specific Notability Guidelines, Stand-alone list before completing the following tasks.


General notability guidelines[edit]

1. In your own words, why it is important to WP:AGF and not WP:BITE new editors.

Answer: It is important to assume good faith because that is the only way to help in developing a online encyclopedia and help newcomers. Not biting newcomers is a way to improve wikipedia because if they continue to be bullied the organization might collapsed. Tbiw (talk) 10:42, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

checkY Most new editors make mistakes because their lack of knowledge on what's appropriate or not in the community standards, Wikipedia policies and guidelines and not intend to harm Wikipedia. A civilized communication and provide support to new editors would encouraged editors to continues to edit Wikipedia pages. To avoid attacks on new editors which may result in unpleasant situations such as fights or their leave and subsequent loss to the project. Cassiopeia(talk) 09:02, 7 September 2020 (UTC)


2. In your own words, how does notability is defined in Wikipedia?

Answer: Notability is defined in my way is that act of making, backing up a point,section or a whole article. It is also a way of proving one is not providing original research.Tbiw (talk) 10:42, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

checkY. In Wikipedia, notability means "worthy to be noted" - it is defined as a topic is "presumably" notable for stand-alone article or list if (1) it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject whee by the sources talk "directly" about the subject in depth and in length and not only passing mentioned and (2) it is not excluded under the What WP:Wikipedia is not policy. Cassiopeia(talk) 09:02, 7 September 2020 (UTC)


3. Does a step by step instructions on how to "Change a car tire" considered a notable topic in Wikipedia?

Answer: No. Wikipedia is not a book that explain how to do things .Tbiw (talk) 10:42, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

checkY As per WP:NOTMANUAL Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a how to manual site. Cassiopeia(talk) 09:02, 7 September 2020 (UTC)


4. What are the differences between A WP:GNG and a specific notability guidelines? how do we determine which one to use when patrolling an article?

Answer: GNG like it name is general for any topic and any subject and SNG is also support articles in a specific field .The difference are one is generally used and one is specifically used. We can determine the one used based on the content. If an article fails GNG according to info i read isn't totally qualified. And if both is passed is a great article. We can determine to use both but if one fails one might be considered.Tbiw (talk) 11:13, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

checkY Example: certain subjects would not meet GNG due to the fact that no article talk about them directly in length and in dept such the academics- WP:PROF - who would received few or none independence source talk about them (we would see BBC write an article about car stuck in a tree see here but not the President of Australian National University would be hard to find) Other SGN such as WP:NCORP and WP:NPOL specify a very strict set of source criteria and requirements respectively. Cassiopeia(talk) 09:02, 7 September 2020 (UTC)


Specific notability guidelines[edit]

5. If an editor creates an article about "2024 Summer Olympics" in 2019 without providing any sources, is the subject considered not notable and why?

Answer: Fails doesn't even qualify for WP: GNG. We need sources that are secondary, reliable and independent source according to GNG factor. It also fails WP: NSPORT Tbiw (talk) 11:23, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

checkY For good practice, and if you know the subject, when patrolling, do check if there are any independent, reliable sources avail be, and if so, add them into the page. Cassiopeia(talk) 09:02, 7 September 2020 (UTC)


B. Without considered of sources/content policies and review just based on "subject specific notability" (SSN) "alone" for sake of the exercises below, please answer if the subject meets the SSN guidelines, based on the given content below, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.


6. A New York city based 2019 start up software company , specializing in data mining, has just received a USD 200K investor fund.

Answer: Fails the primary criteria of WP:NORG, not having independent, reliable source with significant coverage. Not been carried on any news agency and not having reliable sources. The whole world can't know when they received 200k investor fund. Not notable Tbiw (talk) 13:26, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

checkY. Specified sources are the very important requirement when reviewing a "company/organisation" article for many sources are either not independent (marketing/paid by the company itself) or not reliable (press releases) and etc. Cassiopeia(talk) 08:40, 9 September 2020 (UTC)


7. Nascimento Ferreira who is a Ultimate Fighting Championships fighters with the undefeated mixed martial arts record of 8-0.

Answer: Fails WP:MMATIER He hasn't fought atless three fights in top tier MMA organization. Tbiw (talk) 11:31, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

checkY. Pls note WP:MMABIO is a SNG guidlines but WP:MMATIER is an essay; however, they are related. Cassiopeia(talk) 08:40, 9 September 2020 (UTC)


8. A upcoming action drama title "Suleiman the Great" based on the the life of Suleiman the Magnificent, was reported will be in production in December 2020 and to be released on August 2022 in the cinemas.

Answer: It hasn't been in production and not being legally known or watched in cinemas. Fails the criteria of WP: NF. Tbiw (talk) 12:07, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Example - Answer: The subject is not notable under (1) WP:NFF (2) because as of today, 20 August 2020, the film is not yet in production. WP:NFF states that films that are not confirmed to be in principal photography should not have their own articles. However, information about the film is allowed to be included in the Suleiman the Magnificent article, also per WP:NFF. Cassiopeia(talk) 02:35, 8 September 2020 (UTC)



9. A political candidates, without any previous or current political position, who is running for November 2020 election for a Senator position in United States with multiple local newspapers coverage of his candidacy.

Answer: Fails, WP: Politician criteria 2 has to receive significant press coverage and criteria 1 has to been in a position or elected to be in a position Tbiw (talk) 12:23, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

checkY. Most politician would have some coverage during their campaign for the position so only politician usually in state or federal positions to be considered meets WP:NPOL. We would accept the article if the subject has "won" the election but yet to assume the office. Cassiopeia(talk) 08:40, 9 September 2020 (UTC)



10. A singer who self produced his first album in May 2019 and his songs are listed in Spotify.

Answer: Fails WP: NMUSIC, criteria 1 "Has not been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself". Tbiw (talk) 13:13, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

checkY subject fails all WP: NMUSIC criteria. Cassiopeia(talk) 08:40, 9 September 2020 (UTC)



C. Based on which SSN guidelines the below subjects are notable under (1) which notability criteriaMUSICBI#1 (if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations

11. Carlos Alós-Ferrer

Answer: Pass, WP: NACADEMIC criteria 4 making a significant impact to the area of higher education. "Alós-Ferrer, Carlos and Nick Netzer (2010). The Logit-Response Dynamics, Games and Economic Behavior, 68 (2), pp. 413–427." Tbiw (talk) 12:58, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

☒N. Subject meets WP:NPROF #1 - see [1] for being highly cited and #8 as the chief editor of Journal of Economic Psychology [2], and #8 as the editor in chief of a notable journal (Journal of Economic Psychology). Note - most newspapers do not write about academics but you wold see articles about cats stuck on the tree as such we could refer to WP:NACADEMIC for academics. Cassiopeia(talk) 08:40, 9 September 2020 (UTC)


12. Alistair Overeem

Answer: Pass WP:MMATIER criteria 2 having fought for highest title of top tier MMA organization Tbiw (talk) 13:02, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

{{{1}}} Subject passes both WP:MMABIO - fought more than 3 fights under UFC and WP:NKICK for wining the K-1 World Grand Prix Champion. Cassiopeia(talk) 08:40, 9 September 2020 (UTC)


13. Jennifer Lopez

Answer: Pass WP: MUSICBIO criteria 8 She was nominated and won a major music awards.Tbiw (talk) 13:16, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

checkY. Lopes meets SINGER#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #8, #11, #12 and NACTOR#1, #2, #3. Cassiopeia(talk) 08:40, 9 September 2020 (UTC)


14. Three Mile Island accident

Answer: Pass WP: EVENT criteria 2 having widespread national and international widespread Tbiw (talk) 13:19, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

checkY. Cassiopeia(talk) 08:40, 9 September 2020 (UTC)


15. Persepolis

Answer: Pass,WP: NGEO criteria 1 it is populated and legally known "UNESCO World Heritage Centre (2006)." Tbiw (talk) 13:23, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

checkY. Cassiopeia(talk) 08:40, 9 September 2020 (UTC)


Tbiw Good day. See assignment 1 above. For all the assignments, pls provide hist diffs of the articles, reverts, edits, reports, results of the reports, guidelines, talk page messages, and any hist diff that is applicable. Pls provide guidelines where applicable and justify/explain in details of your application or analysis. Pls ping me if you need assistance (here in this program page at the communication section of every assignment). Please book mark this page and ping me when you have finished the assignment for me to review.Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia(talk) 04:36, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

@Cassiopeia: I am done with the assignment and the work.Tbiw (talk) 09:00, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
TbiwPls see above comment. Note (1) pls provide link/guidelines for you answer (example Answer 3 you didnt provide). (2) pls re-read Part B & C requirements and answer the questions 6-15 again. When you have done, pls ping me here (not on my talk page). Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia(talk) 09:02, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
@Cassiopeia: I don't understand the differences between B&C. Those statement aren't clear to me.Tbiw (talk) 11:36, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Tbiw, First of all, you need to add additional " : " (to move one space to the right) from the previous message thread before start writing for this is the communication protocol in Wikipedia. Secondly, My username is sentence case and not all lower case. If you click on MUSICBI#1 it will bring to you Wikipedia:Notability (music) - Each SNG have a set of criteria, you need to specify which criteria the subject meet. Lastly, you answer need to justify by guidelines and the criteria if any and the justification need to be elaborate in details in your answer. Thank you. Cassiopeia(talk) 11:45, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
@Cassiopeia: I am done with the assignment.Tbiw (talk) 20:22, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Tbiw, I am not sure I explained to you clear enough on my previous message. What I meant is that you need to "specify whcih criteria" for that specify SNG. Example: XXX meets [[[WP:MUSICBIO|MUSICBIO#1]] because xxxxxxxxx and criteria #4 because xxxxxxxxx. (xxx is your justification based on the guidelines in your own words as per the question given. Pls see answered 8 for example. ping me when you have done the rework. Cassiopeia(talk) 02:35, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
@Cassiopeia: Work redone stated the criteria under the SNG. Hoping,Tbiw (talk) 04:55, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Tbiw, See comments above. Do note, some of the subject would meet more than one SNG. You need to read all the SNG and the whole article to determine that and not just what the questions ask. Secondly, do take your time to read the guidelines and the links provided in the guidelines to understand the fundamental info for it will be a lot easier for you in the later assignments as each chapter is with the assumption you truly understand the assignment/reading material before. Also do provide as much info/justification you can for I can see why and how you come to such conclusion so I may advise you on things you make the right decision or things you might not aware/wrong about. Let me know if you have any questions or you are ready to move on to next assignment. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia(talk) 08:40, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
: Normally i didn't try with the result but i am learning and i wish to ask about my behavioral conduct and manner of response to assignment.Tbiw (talk) 08:52, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
:@Cassiopeia: I am ready for the next lesson.Tbiw (talk) 08:57, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Tbiw, No issues with your conduct as tt is a learning process and this program is particularly comprehensive and complex. Few things to note: (1) you need to read all the reading material (2) justification in details based on guidelines (3) ask questions if any for I am here to help (4) pls add additional ":" from the previous message (to indent one space to the right) for this is the normal communication protocol in Wikipedia talk pages (I have added them for you on this message thread) and (5) pls read Help:Wikitext for more Wiki markup. Let me know if you have any questions. Cassiopeia(talk) 09:01, 9 September 2020 (UTC)


Sources[edit]

Background for trainees[edit]

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia for such content claimed should be supported by independent (secondary), reliable sources for verification. Please read WP:RS, WP:IS, WP:RSP, WP:V, WP:PROVEIT, WP:Primary, WP:Secondary, and WP:Tertiary and answered the the below questions in your own words.
You could contact WP:RX if you could not find the sources yourself either on web due to Paywall content or printed books.


Exercises[edit]

1.
Topic Explanation 5 Examples Comment by Cass
Reliable source Reliable source are trusted and truthful source that are published with a reputation for fact checking and accuracy.
  1. (example)The Guardian newspaper
  2. Vanguard news
  3. The Nation
  4. Daily Trust
  5. Tribune news
  6. The Punch
 checkY. Cassiopeia(talk) 08:15, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
User generated sources Is a form of content (text,images,audio e.t.c) that has been posted by users on online platform such as social media and wikis
  1. Facebook
  2. Twitter
  3. Instagram
  4. Discord
  5. Wikipedia
 checkY. Wikis are sites based on Wiki model - however, for Wikipedia is not a source. In Wikipedia we provide sources of the content we write. We have to look into each source instead of claiming all wikis are user generated sources. Cassiopeia(talk) 08:15, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
Non Independent source These are sources that has connection to the subject matter.
  1. Press releases
  2. Syndicated releases
  3. Conflict of interest
  4. Personal views
  5. Promotional releases
 checkY Conflict of interest is not a source. Not sure what you meant by syndicated releases here. Example would be Webpages created by the subject of an article, self published sources, Sponsored articles and videos, Any media affiliated with the subject of an article, Original research etc. Cassiopeia(talk) 08:15, 6 November 2020 (UTC)



2.
Type Explanation Sources (15 Primary ; 5 Secondary ; 5 Tertiary) Comment by Cass
Primary Primary sources are original materials that are close to an event, and are often accounts written by people who are directly involved.
  1. (example) scientific journal articles reporting experimental research results
  2. Autobiography
  3. Interviews
  4. Witness of the event
  5. Photograph from the event
  6. Immediate report from an event
  7. Immediate result of a scientific experiment
  8. News immediate report
  9. Samples of science experiment
  10. Sport analysis
  11. Report of an event
  12. Football stats
  13. Election data
  14. Reports
  15. Raw data from source
 checkY. Cassiopeia(talk) 23:26, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Secondary Secondary sources provides on author's own thinking based on primary sources.
  1. (example) newspaper
  2. Magazine
  3. Journals
  4. News
  5. Football Book/magazine
 checkY Cassiopeia(talk) 23:26, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Tertiary Tertiary sources are publications such as encyclopedia and compedia that summarize both primary and secondary sources.
  1. (example) encyclopedias
  2. Wikipedia
  3. Brittacianna
  4. Textbooks
  5. Scientific Journals
  6. Magazine
 checkY. Cassiopeia(talk) 08:15, 6 November 2020 (UTC)



3.


Subject Primary Secondary Tertiary Comment by Cass
Example: Art Example:Sculpture Example:Article critiquing the sculpture Example:Encyclopedic article on the sculptor
History Witness of the historical event Book writing about the historical event Encyclopedia cover about the event checkY. Cassiopeia(talk) 23:43, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Science Immediate result of the experiment Article or newspaper cover on that particular event Encyclopedia cover of the event checkY. Cassiopeia(talk) 23:43, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Athletes Witness of the athletic event Books, newspaper cover and article about the event Encyclopedia cover of the event. checkY. Cassiopeia(talk) 23:43, 16 November 2020 (UTC)



4. Please explain in your own words why the content claimed needs to be verified?

Answer: Content need to be verified inorder to prove that there is no original research. We could do these by using inline citation with enough information about the source. Information could include date,author,agency e.t.c.

checkY. Content needs to verifiable so we may know where the info/source from for we could know if the source is independent and/or reliable, and not because it is the facts or true - see WP:But it's true!. If source indicated XXX is from Jamaica but the fact XXX is from Cuba, we put XXX is from Jamaica in article as per source. We will correct the info when the sources (not need to be the same source) correct itself. For example Alexander the Great - How he die is based on which sources you read, from poising, to malaria and typhoid fever to infectious (meningitis) to acute pancreatitis and etc. Cassiopeia(talk) 23:43, 16 November 2020 (UTC)


5.Could we used Wikipedia as the source? and why?

Answer: No. We can't due Wikipedia also depends on reliable, independent sources per WP: CIRCULAR. The article we want to create need reliable and independent sources in which Wikipedia depends on.

checkY. Cassiopeia(talk) 23:43, 16 November 2020 (UTC)


6.Give an example and explain why a source is reliable but not independent of a subject?

Answer: Just like Thinkerspool Website is a source that is so reliable but owned and controlled by admins and members due to they don't publish news and updates benefiting to one party. So this source example is not independent due to it is owned and controlled by admins and members of Thinkerspool book club.

☒N.23:43, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Pls answer again (give a "specific" example) and justify why the source source is reliable but not independent of a subject.


7.Give an example and explain why a source is independent source but not reliable?

Answer: Epoch Times news to an article can be independent but Wikipedia didn't list under reliable sources it so it is not reliable by wikipedia.

Tbiw pls provide link where it states "Wikipedia didn't list it so it is not reliable by wikipedia". Cassiopeia(talk) 23:43, 16 November 2020 (UTC)


Pls indicate "y" for yes or "n" for no or "?" after "ind", "rel" and "sig" (see first example) and give a brief explanation of why you place "y" or "n".
8.
David Petraeus

David Howell Petraeus AO (/pɪˈtreɪ.əs/; born November 7, 1952) is a retired United States Army general and public official. He served as Director of the Central Intelligence Agency from September 6, 2011,[1] until his resignation on November 9, 2012[2] after his affair with Paula Broadwell was reported.[3]

Petraeus was born in Cornwall-on-Hudson, New York, the son of Sixtus Petraeus (1915–2008),[4] a sea captain from Franeker, Netherlands.[5]


In 2003, Petraeus commanded the 101st Airborne Division in the fall of Baghdad[6][7]


Source assessment table:
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2012/11/09/david-petraeus-cia-resign-nbc/1695271/ Yes The source is a major newspaper Yes The source doesn't have any connection with the article Yes The source totally explain about the details of the particular event ✔ Yes
http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/us/2011/09/06/petraeus-sworn-into-cia.cnn?iref=allsearch Yes No connection to the article Yes It is in WP: RSP Yes Detailed information ✔ Yes
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/david-petraeus-paula-broadwell_n_2118893 Yes Major newspaper Yes It is a trusted website site about information Yes The post totally talks about him ✔ Yes
https://www.geni.com/people/Sixtus-Petraeus/6000000015418360012 Yes Not totally related to the content. No Not in WP: RSP No Article is not about him but related to him ✘ No
http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2010/05/petraeus-exclusive-201005 Yes Not related to the article Yes It is good reputable website Yes It explains in details ✔ Yes
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/beyond/interviews/petraeus.html No Partially close to the article No Not in WP: RSP Yes Explaining in details about the article ✘ No
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/profiles/david-petraeus-general-surge-401740.html Yes No WP: COI Yes It is listed in RSP Yes It is explaining in details about him ✔ Yes
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

References

  1. ^ "Petraeus sworn in as CIA director". CNN. Retrieved October 11, 2019.
  2. ^ Johnson, Kevin (November 9, 2012). "David Petraeus resigns from CIA". USA Today. Retrieved November 9, 2012.
  3. ^ "Petraeus Shocked By Girlfriend's Emails". HuffPost. 2012-11-12. Retrieved 2019-10-11.
  4. ^ "Sixtus Petraeus". geni.com.
  5. ^ "David Petraeus' Winning Streak". Vanity Fair. March 30, 2010. Retrieved October 11, 2019.
  6. ^ "beyond baghdad". www.pbs.org. 2004-02-12. Retrieved 2019-10-11.
  7. ^ "David Petraeus: General Surge". The Independent. 2007-09-08. Retrieved 2019-10-11.



9. Please answer if the subject meets the "subject specific notability" guidelines, Which subject specific notability based on the given content above, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

Answer: Yes passed WP: NSOLDIER criteria 3 held a high level in military.

checkY. Two points to note here. (1) PBS is generally considered a reliable source. 2. Huffpost - Although HuffPost contributors is considered not reliable in WP:RSP but if we look closely, the piece is written by By ANNE FLAHERTY, KIMBERLY DOZIER AND ADAM GOLDMAN, THE ASSOCIATED PRESS. The Associated press is considered reliable source as they sell their news to other news agencies. However, the content is based on many individual opinions, for such I would talk it as not reliable sources. Cassiopeia(talk) 23:43, 16 November 2020 (UTC)


10.

Martina Hingis is a Swiss former professional tennis player.[1] She won five Grand Slam singles titles.[2] Hingis was one of the highest-paid female athletes in 2000.[3] She retired in November 2007 after being hampered by a hip injury for several months and testing positive for a metabolite of cocaine during that year's Wimbledon Championships,[4] which led to a two-year suspension from the sport.[5]

Source assessment table:
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
https://www.instagram.com/martinahingis80/ No Related to the person Yes It is a person story and might be considered reliable. No It is just a photo no explanation in details. ✘ No
https://www.latimes.com/sports/more/la-sp-us-open-hingis-20170910-story.html Yes It is a major newspaper. Yes WP: RSP Yes It discussed about the subject in details. ✔ Yes
[3] Yes Not related with the article/subject. Yes It is reputable website. No It doesn't explain in details. ✘ No
https://www.espn.com/tennis/story/_/id/21171438/tennis-another-twist-bizarre-career-martina-hingis Yes It is major sport newspaper Yes It is a reliable website and newspaper. Yes It discussed deeply about the subject. ✔ Yes
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2007/nov/01/tennis Yes It is a major newspaper. Yes WP: RSP Yes It discussed in details about the event related to the subject. ✔ Yes
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

References

  1. ^ "Martina Hingis (@martinahingis80) • Instagram photos and videos". www.instagram.com. Retrieved 2019-10-11.
  2. ^ "Martina Hingis wins her 25th Grand Slam championship, the women's doubles crown at the U.S. Open". Los Angeles Times. 2017-09-11. Retrieved 2019-10-11.
  3. ^ a b Paul Fein (30 January 2003). Tennis Confidential: Today's Greatest Players, Matches, and Controversies. Potomac Books, Inc. pp. 197–. ISBN 978-1-57488-526-2.
  4. ^ "Done again? Why Martina Hingis decided to retire for a third time". ESPN.com. 2017-10-26. Retrieved 2019-10-11.
  5. ^ Staff; agencies (2007-11-01). "Tennis: Martina Hingis retires amid cocaine controversy". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2019-10-11.
11. Please answer if the subject meets the "subject specific notability" guidelines, Which subject specific notability based on the given content above, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

Answer:Passed WP: NTENNIS criteria 3 competed in highest main-level draw in one of the highest professional tournament and criteria 6 have a record recognised by ITF,ATP and other professional bodies.

checkY Instagram is not independent nor reliable source. Subject pass WP:NTENNIS SSN (sport specific notability) - Full content from the article Martina Hingis would pass all the WP:NTENNIS criteria. Cassiopeia(talk) 23:43, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Pls indicate "y" for yes or "n" or "?" for no after "ind", "rel" and "sig" (see first example) and give a brief explanation of why you place "y" or "n".
12.
Fallingwater, Mill Run, Pennsylvania (1937)

Frank Lloyd Wright (June 8, 1867 – April 9, 1959) was an American architect, interior designer, writer, and educator. Wright believed in designing structures that were in harmony with humanity and its environment, a philosophy he called organic architecture. His creative period spanned more than 70 years. He works includes The Guggenheim, swirling, snail-shaped museum in the middle of Manhattan.[1][2] Fallingwater, which has been called "the best all-time work of American architecture."[3] This is one of Wright's most famous private residences (completed 1937), was built for Mr. and Mrs. Edgar J. Kaufmann, Sr., at Mill Run, Pennsylvania. Constructed over a 30-foot waterfall, it was designed according to Wright's desire to place the occupants close to the natural surroundings. The house was intended to be more of a family getaway, rather than a live-in home.[4]


Source assessment table:
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
https://nypost.com/2017/06/07/frank-lloyd-wright-was-a-house-builder-and-homewrecker/ Yes It is major source newspaper. Yes It is reliable website that is reputable. Yes It covers all details of the subject. ✔ Yes
https://franklloydwright.org/work/ No Related with the subject. No It talks about the subject in which stories will be for the subject only. Yes It explains in details about the event. ✘ No
https://web.archive.org/web/20080302053743/http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/jul2004/nf20040728_3153_db078.htm Yes It is a major newspaper. Yes WP: RSP Yes It explains in details about the subject. ✔ Yes
https://books.google.com/books?id=KSA1HTTU-eMC Yes Not related with the subject. Yes It is a site used as a reference help in Wikipedia. Yes It explains in details. ✔ Yes
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

References

  1. ^ Hoffman, Barbara (2017-06-07). "Famed architect Frank Lloyd Wright had a dark side". New York Post. Retrieved 2019-10-04.
  2. ^ "Frank Lloyd Wright's Work". Frank Lloyd Wright Foundation. Retrieved 2019-10-04.
  3. ^ "BW Online | July 28, 2004 | Frank Lloyd Wright: America's Architect". 2008-03-02. Archived from the original on 2008-03-02. Retrieved 2019-10-04.
  4. ^ Robert C. Twombly (24 April 1987). Frank Lloyd Wright: His Life and His Architecture. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-0-471-85797-6.


13. Please answer if the subject meets the "subject specific notability" guidelines, Which subject specific notability based on the given content above, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

Answer: It passes the all the criteria for WP: ARCHITECT

checkY. Sources answers are good. But Q13 asks for which "subject specific notability" guidelines". Pls answer again. Cassiopeia(talk) 00:08, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
Answer again Q13:



14.

Jordan Lennon (born February 22, 2000), is a British film producer and actor. [1] Lennon is currently a member of BAFTA.[2] He continues to work aside 20th Century Fox, Warner Bros, Wicked Wales, Capture Studios, Cineworld, Paramount Pictures, and Rockefeller Foundation.[3]

At age 16, the Vice President of 20th Century Fox, Paul Higginson. Who previously worked on Star Wars, Titanic, and Independence Day took on Jordan and Rowan Snow as a mentor.[4] In December 2018, Jordan and Rowan finished British Film Academy.[5] Jordan lived in Skelmersdale for 10 years before moving to Rhyl, North Wales. He's currently writing 'Stranger in the Night' scrreenplay for Warner Brothers.


Source assessment table:
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm8902348/ Yes It is not related with subject. No It is an user-generated source Yes It covers all details about the subject. ✘ No
http://www.bafta.org/wales No Related with the subject. No Not reliable. No It doesn't explain in details. ✘ No
https://www.linkedin.com/in/jordan-d-98111a125 No Related with the subject. No WP: RSP No Doesn't explain about the subject. ✘ No
https://www.behindthevoiceactors.com/Jordan-David/ Yes Not associated with the article Yes The source is an unreliable source. Not mentioned in WP: RSP No Doesn't explain in details. ✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

References

  1. ^ "Jordan D. Lennon". IMDb. Retrieved 2019-01-21.
  2. ^ "BAFTA Cymru". www.bafta.org. 2014-06-16. Retrieved 2019-01-21.
  3. ^ Lennon, Jordan. "LinkedIn Account". LinkedIn. {{cite web}}: |archive-date= requires |archive-url= (help)
  4. ^ "Jordan David - 2 Character Images". Behind The Voice Actors. Retrieved 2019-10-04.
  5. ^ "BFI Film Academy". Tape Community Music & Film. 2016-08-24. Retrieved 2019-01-21.


15. Please answer if the subject meets the "subject specific notability" guidelines, Which subject specific notability based on the given content above, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

Answer:Passes WP: NACTOR criteria 1 having significant roles in multiple films and other production.

☒N. Pls see sources answer below and the subject fail WP: NACTOR (pls read WP:NACTOR throught again. Cassiopeia(talk) 00:08, 17 November 2020 (UTC)


Source assessment table:
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm8902348/ No IMDB is user generated hence can't be considered independent. No The content is user generated. No oesn't discuss the subject much. ✘ No
http://www.bafta.org/wales No It is the cite of the org for the award. Yes Generally it's reliable No No information at all. ✘ No
https://www.linkedin.com/in/jordan-d-98111a125 No No, as it's the subject's personal page. No Not reliable as the subject states about himself as he could say anything about himself. Yes ye, info is about only himslef ✘ No
https://www.behindthevoiceactors.com/Jordan-David/ Yes there's no connection to the subject. No as the webpage is mainly user-generated (the users can request an actor or any other information to be added to the webpage. There's no evidence of fact checking and (as the site states in FAQ – mistakes are possible). Yes the page is devoted to the subject, however just 2 voice roles listed. ✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.


16.
Sonny Bill Williams 2010

Sonny William Williams (born 3 August 1985), who is a Muslim[1], is a New Zealand All blacks rugby union footballer,[2] Williams was a Marist Saints junior when he was spotted playing in Auckland by Bulldogs talent scout John Ackland.[3] In 2002 he was offered a contract and moved to Sydney (as the youngest player to ever sign with an NRL club) to play in the Bulldogs' junior grades.[4]

Source assessment table:
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-7505117/2019-Rugby-World-Cup-Sonny-Bill-Williams-expecting-fourth-child.html Yes Not related with the subject. No Not reliable. Yes explaining in details ✘ No
http://stats.allblacks.com/asp/Profile.asp?ABID=1108 No Related with subject. Yes It is reliable source. Yes It explains in details about the subject. ✘ No
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/warriors-league-team/news/article.cfm?c_id=360&objectid=10399308 Yes It is a major source newspaper and doesn't have anything to do with relation of the subject. Yes It is a reliable source. Yes It explains in details. ✔ Yes
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/10/01/1096527943523.html Yes It is a major source newspaper. Yes Didn't obstruct any qualifications of a reliable source and can be considered reliable. Yes Discussed in details. ✔ Yes
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

References

  1. ^ "2019 Rugby World Cup: Sonny Bill Williams is expecting a fourth child". Mail Online. 2019-09-25. Retrieved 2019-10-04.
  2. ^ "Stats | allblacks.com". stats.allblacks.com. Retrieved 2019-10-04.
  3. ^ Rattue, Chris (2 September 2006). "Jerome Ropati – Miracle in the making". New Zealand Herald. APN Holdings. Retrieved 10 October 2010.
  4. ^ "The King, Sonny and heir". Sydney Morning Herald. Fairfax. 2 October 2004. Retrieved 12 November 2011.


17. Please answer if the subject meets the "subject specific notability" guidelines, Which subject specific notability based on the given content above, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

Answer: Passes WP: NRU criteria 1 and 2.

checkY. See sources ansewer below. The subject meets WP:NRU criteria 1, 2; WP:NBOX criterion 1 and WP:RLN criteria 1, 3 in full article. Cassiopeia(talk) 00:08, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
Source assessment table:
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-7505117/2019-Rugby-World-Cup-Sonny-Bill-Williams-expecting-fourth-child.html Yes has no affiliation with the subject No considered unreliable by the community, editors are not encouraged to cite it Yes includes many different info on family and himself ✘ No
http://stats.allblacks.com/asp/Profile.asp?ABID=1108 No the source is affiliated with the subject No as it's not independent, also written in a biased manner Yes a lot of facts about him and his career ✘ No
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/warriors-league-team/news/article.cfm?c_id=360&objectid=10399308 Yes it's a big newspaper No the source offers an interview, where subject is mentioned in a subjective statement No subjective statement, more of a trivial mention ✘ No
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/10/01/1096527943523.html Yes it's a big newspaper Yes known for fact checking Yes mentions a lot of facts about the subject ✔ Yes
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.


18.


Bryan Adams Guadalajara 2006

"Can't Stop This Thing We Started" is a song by Canadian singer and songwriter Bryan Adams. The song was written by Adams and Robert John "Mutt" Lange, and was the second single from Adams' 1991 album Waking Up the Neighbours where by the song was nominated for Grammy Award 1992 "Song of the Year"[1]


Weekly charts

Chart (1991-1992) Peak
position
US Mainstream Rock (Billboard)[2] 2
Denmark (IFPI)[3] 2
US Billboard Hot 100[4] 2

| class="col-break col-break-2" |

End-of-year charts

End-of-year chart (1991) Position
Canada Top Singles (RPM)[5] 3


Source assessment table:
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
[6] Yes It is a major source newspaper. Yes It is a reliable newspaper source. Yes It explains in details. ✔ Yes
[7] No It is a dead link No Hardly to know about a dead link No It is a dead link. ✘ No
[8] Yes Not associated with the subject. Yes It is a reliable source. Yes It explains about the subject event. ✔ Yes
Error: a source must be specified ? Unknown
Error: a source must be specified ? Unknown
Error: a source must be specified ? Unknown
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

References

  1. ^ Pareles, Jon (1992-01-09). "Grammy Short List: Many For a Few". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2019-12-28.
  2. ^ "Bryan Adams Chart History (Mainstream Rock)". Billboard.
  3. ^ "Top 10 Denmark" (PDF). Music & Media. Retrieved March 21, 2018.[permanent dead link]
  4. ^ "Bryan Adams Chart History (Hot 100)". Billboard.
  5. ^ "RPM 100 Hit Tracks of 1991". RPM. Retrieved November 23, 2017.
  6. ^ Pareles, Jon (1992-01-09). "Grammy Short List: Many For a Few". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2019-12-28.
  7. ^ "Top 10 Denmark" (PDF). Music & Media. Retrieved March 21, 2018.[permanent dead link]
  8. ^ "RPM 100 Hit Tracks of 1991". RPM. Retrieved November 23, 2017.
19. Please answer if the subject meets the "subject specific notability" guidelines, Which subject specific notability based on the given content above, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

Answer: Passes WP: NSONG criteria 2 having won a award or honour and the song won a Grammy award. Pass

Tbiw The references show 8 sources - pls answer all of them (including the dead link}}
Answer again:



20.


Kamlesh Bhatt is a Solution Architect and a DevOps Engineer living in Singapore. I am a fan of technology, music, and entrepreneurship. He is interested in photography and travel. He could be reached at his blog and youtube channel.[1][2]


Source assessment table:
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
https://medium.com/@kamleshbhatt_ No Associated with the article No User generated sources No Not explaining in details ✘ No
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kamlesh-bhatt-45392961/ No Associated with the article No User generated sources No Not explaining in details ✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

References

  1. ^ "Kamlesh Bhatt". Medium. Retrieved 2019-12-28.
  2. ^ Bhatt, Kamlesh (December 27, 2019). "Kamlesh Bhatt". Linkedin. Retrieved December 27, 2019.
21. Please answer if the subject meets the "subject specific notability" guidelines, Which subject specific notability based on the given content above, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

Answer: Fails WP: GNG and WP: SNG not notable. It seems promotional with User-Generated sources like LinkedIn and Medium (social media).

checkY. Cassiopeia(talk) 00:08, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Tbiw See assignment 2 above. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia(talk) 09:03, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

@Cassiopeia: Done with the assignment. hoping,Tbiw (talk) 22:00, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Tbiw If you click "show" next to the"Source assessment table" you would see there are sources assesment you need to provide the answer. When you edit (which by default is in source editing mode) you show see the table from Question 8 onward. Pls work on the questions as requested. Ping me when you have done. Thank you. Cassiopeia(talk) 01:06, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Tbiw You have missed Q 18, and pls indicate (from Question 8 onward) and again justify in details of of why the source is / is not reliable/independent and how do you justify of signification coverage has achieve/not yet achieved. Pls take your time to work on this. Cassiopeia(talk) 03:04, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
@Cassiopeia: Question 18 is blank.Tbiw (talk) 11:25, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Tbiw There are 4 sources on Q18, kindly add them in the assessment table and answer the question. Let me know if any clarification is needed. By the way, pls add an additional ":" from the previosu message thread (I have added for you) before start writing for one space indentation for this is the communication protocol in Wikipedia talk page. For additional Wiki markup pls see Help:Wikitext. Cassiopeia(talk) 23:40, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
@Cassiopeia: The remaining part is difficult due to mobile data problems and Inability to quickly access the project quickly. I don't know what to do. Tbiw (talk) 16:20, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
Tbiw NPPS program is a rather difficult progaram. I suggest you to use a laptop cupped with good internet bandwith. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia(talk) 07:20, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
@Cassiopeia: Am done with the assignment. Tbiw (talk) 21:48, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
Tbiw OK. Give me a few days to review it. Thank you. Cassiopeia(talk) 08:36, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
Tbiw Hi for Q-2 You need to provide Sources (15 Primary ; 5 Secondary ; 5 Tertiary). Pls complete them and ping me. Thank you. Cassiopeia(talk) 08:15, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
Cassiopeia Done and meet up to the required numbers.
Tbiw Hi, Appologies it take some time to review your assignment. Pls see comments above and pls answer again for Q6, Q7, Q13 and Q17. Once you have finished, pls ping me. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia(talk) 00:08, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
Cassiopeia I am back to work and also corrected my past mistakes.Tbiw (talk) 21:43, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Content Policy[edit]

Article titles[edit]

Please read WP:TITLE and answer the questions below


1. Article name "Hannibal Barca" - Does the article name need to be change? and Why? (please explain based on Wikipedia guidelines and name/link the guidelines in your answer)

Hannibal Barca was a Carthaginian general and statesman who is widely considered one of the greatest military commanders in history. His father, Hamilcar Barca, was a leading Carthaginian commander during the First Punic War (264–241 BC).[1][2][3]

References

  1. ^ Eve MacDonald (24 February 2015). Hannibal: A Hellenistic Life. Yale University Press. pp. 48–. ISBN 978-0-300-21015-6.
  2. ^ John Whitaker; Hannibal (1794). The course of Hannibal over the Alps ascertained. John Stockdale, Piccadilly. pp. 1–.
  3. ^ Patrick N Hunt (11 July 2017). Hannibal. Simon & Schuster. pp. 214–. ISBN 978-1-4391-0977-9.

Answer:



2. Article name "Magic Johnson". Does the article name need to be change? and Why?(please explain based on Wikipedia guidelines and name/link the guidelines in your answer)

Earvin "Magic" Johnson Jr. (born August 14, 1959) is an American retired professional basketball player and former president of basketball operations of the Los Angeles Lakers of the National Basketball Association (NBA). He played point guard for the Lakers for 13 seasons.[1][2][3][4]

References

  1. ^ Roselius, J. Chris. (2011). Magic Johnson : basketball star & entrepreneur. Edina, Minn.: ABDO Pub. Co. ISBN 9781617147562. OCLC 663953248.
  2. ^ "Magic Johnson | Biography & Facts". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 2019-10-23.
  3. ^ Stein, Marc; Deb, Sopan (2019-04-11). "Magic Johnson Always Set His Sights Beyond Basketball". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2019-10-23.
  4. ^ "Magic Johnson: Michael Jordan said Stephen Curry not Hall of Famer in fear of tampering fine". sports.yahoo.com. Retrieved 2019-10-23.



Answer:



Biographies of living persons[edit]

Please read WP:BLP and answer the questions below.
3. As per the texts below, pls explain the if the content is acceptable of inclusive and why. (please explain based on Wikipedia guidelines and name/link the guidelines in your answer)

Conor Anthony McGregor (born 14 July 1988) is an Irish professional mixed martial artist and boxer. His is a former Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) featherweight and lightweight champion.[1]

On 15 August 2019, TMZ Sports published a video that appeared to show McGregor punching a man at The Marble Arch Pub in Dublin.[2] The incident happened on 6 April and was originally reported by Irish media, although without the video that showed the attack. Irish police stated in April that they had opened an investigation.[3] McGregor was charged with assault and first appeared in court on 11 October 2019.[4][5][6]

In April 2019, McGregor is the father of Terri Murray's son, Clodagh. Murray bedded McGregor in 2017 at his hotel after the Aintree Grand National just four weeks bofore McGregor's girlfriend Dee Devlin gave birth to their son.

References

  1. ^ "The most surprising stories behind Conor McGregor's incredible success". IrishCentral. 13 December 2016. Retrieved 3 September 2017.
  2. ^ "Video of Conor McGregor Punching Old Man in Head in Whiskey Dispute". TMZ. Retrieved 2019-08-22.
  3. ^ Gaydos, Ryan (2019-08-15). "Conor McGregor seen on video punching bar patron in face over whiskey". Fox News. Retrieved 2019-08-22.
  4. ^ "Conor McGregor charged with pub assault, to appear in Dublin court next week". RT International. Retrieved 2019-10-23.
  5. ^ "UFC: McGregor charged with assault for punching elderly man". South China Morning Post. 2019-10-05. Retrieved 2019-10-23.
  6. ^ "McGregor appears in court in assault case". ESPN.com. 2019-10-11. Retrieved 2019-10-23.


Answer:



4. As per the texts below, pls explain the if the content is acceptable of inclusive and why. (please explain based on Wikipedia guidelines and name/link the guidelines in your answer)

Diana Nyad (née Sneed; born August 22, 1949) is an American author, journalist, motivational speaker, and long-distance swimmer who lives in 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW in Washington, D.C. and could be contacted at +0-202-456-6213.[1] Nyad gained national attention in 1975 when she swam around Manhattan (28 mi or 45 km) and in 1979 when she swam from North Bimini, The Bahamas, to Juno Beach, Florida (102 mi (164 km)). In 2013, on her fifth attempt and at age 64, she became the first person confirmed to swim from Cuba to Florida without the aid of a shark cage, swimming from Havana to Key West (110 mi or 180 km).[2]

References

  1. ^ Anne-Marie Garcia (September 2, 2013). "Diana Nyad completes Cuba-Florida swim". USA Today.
  2. ^ Alvarez, Lizette (September 2, 2013). "Nyad Completes Cuba-to-Florida Swim". The New York Times.


Answer:


Images copyright[edit]

Please read Wikipedia:Image use policy and Wikipedia:Public domain image resources. Please answer the questions below and (1) with explanation based on Wikipedia guidelines and (2) provide the guidelines/links in your answer.


5. Could this image-1 be uploaded into C:Main Page and used in Wikipedia? and Why.

Answer- Explanation:



Answer - link/guideline:



6. Could this image-2 be uploaded into C:Main Page and used in Wikipedia? and Why.

Answer- Explanation:



Answer - link/guideline:


7. Could this image-3 be uploaded into C:Main Page and used in Wikipedia?

Answer- Explanation:



Answer - link/guideline:


8. Could this image-4 be uploaded into C:Main Page and used in Wikipedia? and Why.

Answer- Explanation:



Answer - link/guideline:

Neutral point of view[edit]

P;lease read WP:NPOV and MOS:PUFF. Point out the WP:NPOV words/pharses and rewrite the paragraph on Question 9& 10 from a neutral point of view.

9. She is a brilliant boxer with a rare and exceptional beauty. She turned Pro at the age of 19 after winning one amateur fight on December 14, 2013 where she destroyed her opponent in 20 seconds. Her talent and marketability made her a fighter to watch right out the gate and she fought under XXX promotion on her next fight on February 2014.

Answer:



10. He is a popular, acclaimed Bulgarian actor, who loves by all who have watched his films. He was born in Veliko Tarnovo and started working in the film industry since he was at the tender, innocent of the age of 14 and he has featured in 44 films.

Answer:



11. Please read WP:DUE and in your own words, please explain why it is important to provide balance and due weight content in an article.

Answer:

No original research[edit]

Please read WP:OR and WP:NOT and answer the questions below
12. In your own words, why Wikipedia is not a platform to publish original research?

Answer:



13. In your own words, please provide one example with explanation when it is appropriate to insert an original research or an opinion in an article.

Answer:



14. See this video and write the content in the in an article by using the video info as the source.

Answer:



Verifiability[edit]

Please read WP:V and answer the questions below
15. If the subject has two sons and it is supported by three independent, reliable sources but in reality he has 3 sons. Could we change the content from "2" sons to "3 sons"? and why?

Answer:


Tbiw Hi Welcome back. See assignemtn Assignment 3 above. Cassiopeia(talk) 00:23, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Cassiopeia/NPPS/Tbiw&oldid=1091617016"