Template talk:Infobox classical composer
 | This template was considered for deletion on 2011 December 17. The result of the discussion was "delete, but template was later userfied by the closing admin". |
| This page was nominated at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion on 22 March 2012. The result of the discussion was "Keep" (as redirect to {{Infobox person}}). |
| This template was considered for deletion on 2012 April 20. The result of the discussion was "speedy keep". |
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 28 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Where shall I put the other composers?[edit]
Interested Parties Information relates all kind of composers, authors, adaptors, arrangers, etc. not only for the classical music. I suggest to expand this template for all mentioned persons. (Even the publishers.) ZJ (talk) 11:09, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
IPI name identifier[edit]
I want to genereate a new line for IPI name indetifies according to Interested Parties Information for classical and non-classical composers. How can I do? ZJ (talk) 16:07, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- You would need to develop consensus that this is something that should be added to the template. Nikkimaria (talk) 22:26, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
"Notable works"[edit]
The "notable works" and "list_of_works" parameters say to give the "list of compositions" rather than individual works. Fair enough in my mind. However, why does it display "notable works: list of compositions? It does't really make sense to imply that everything a composer wrote is "notable", why not just say "Works: List of compositions"? I'm not sure how to change this myself. Aza24 (talk) 21:01, 24 November 2022 (UTC)