Template talk:Australian Post Offices

Australia Template‑class

	Australia portal Australian Post Offices is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Template	This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Philately NA‑class

	Philately portal This template is within the scope of WikiProject Philately, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of philately and stamp collecting on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhilatelyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilatelyTemplate:WikiProject PhilatelyPhilately articles
NA	This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Architecture Template‑class

	Architecture portal This template is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Template	This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Many post offices are missing from this list[edit]

The rollout of articles from various heritage registers has added a lot more post office articles. Kerry (talk) 08:26, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have now updated the lists. Kerry (talk) 05:12, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Formatting[edit]

The positioning of the "former" heading is currently done by inserting the "correct" number of <br> to force the heading to the start of the list of former POs in that state. However, the "correct" number depends on the width of your screen. There must be a more screen-width independent way to do this. If you know how, please fix it or at least experiment with it. Thanks Kerry (talk) 05:15, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]