Template talk:American Civil War monuments in Kentucky

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconMilitary history: Memorials / North America / United States / American Civil War Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Military memorials and cemeteries task force
Taskforce icon
North American military history task force
Taskforce icon
United States military history task force
Taskforce icon
American Civil War task force

Requested move 9 March 2019[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved to alternative. As only 204 pages transclude, redirect to or link to these, I will probably suppress the creation of a redirect and clean it up using AutoWikiBrowser. It doesn't strictly meet any of the redirect suppression criteria, but we shouldn't have an internal POV redirect, especially when we have an NPOV policy. Also, IAR. (closed by non-admin page mover) SITH (talk) 18:03, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]



– The only thing "WNA" stands for in this context is War of Northern Aggression, which is at best a joke term and at worst pro-Confederate. We shouldn't be using biased names for the American Civil War, even if they're just abbreviations in template names. (I'm not too particular about the new names, as long as they're neutral; spelling out "American Civil War" instead of abbreviating it would be fine, for instance.) TheCatalyst31 ReactionCreation 22:33, 9 March 2019 (UTC)--Relisted. – Ammarpad (talk) 06:06, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That works for me. TheCatalyst31 ReactionCreation 14:57, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support this alternate proposal. BLAIXX 15:13, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.