Template:Did you know nominations/William Bodiford

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 15:47, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

William Bodiford[edit]

Created/expanded by SusanLesch (talk). Self nom at 18:12, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

  • Somebody will need to clear a copyvio bot notification on my first edit here.
Done, with thanks to User:Madman. -SusanLesch (talk) 22:59, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
  • New enough, long enough, neutrally written, copyvio check finds none, hook is interesting and cited. The citation to the article in the Journal of Japanese Studies can be accepted AGF, the link to amazon.com clearly isn't a reliable source. (I also think the hook would be improved by saying "...was called in the Journal of Japanese Studies...", but that is just my preference.) Moonraker (talk) 16:59, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
Moonraker, thank you for your review. (Sorry to be confusing. I included an Amazon copy in a compound ref because it can be read by anyone, followed by the real citation.) ALT1 is okay with me. -SusanLesch (talk) 17:10, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
ALT1... that a book by William Bodiford was called in the Journal of Japanese Studies "the most important English work on Sōtō Zen to date"?
  • ALT1 is good & ready to go. Moonraker (talk) 19:40, 13 April 2012 (UTC)