Template:Did you know nominations/Tatannuaq

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 03:51, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Tatannuaq

Created by Generalissima (talk). Self-nominated at 04:17, 18 January 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Tatannuaq; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall:

  • Hello @Generalissima: This is my first DYK review so per guideline, second opinion is needed. In any case, the article is interesting to read through, well-sourced, neutral, has no copyright problems; though Earwig returns some similar formulations that you may want to rewrite to lower the percentage :). The hook is interesting, cited, and I suggest linking to C. augustinus itself in the hook,
    ALT1: ... that a species of butterfly was named in honor of an Inuit interpreter?
  • I have one question regarding naming conventions, though:
    • In all the sources I was able to access, his name is spelled "Tattannoeuck". I see that only ref [2], which I do not have access to, has "Tatannuaq" in the title. Is there a reason not to use the more prevalent spelling in the sources cited?
    • AGF sources: [2] [7] [McGoogan]
  • Best wishes, ~~lol1VNIO (I made a mistake? talk to me) 21:43, 19 January 2024 (UTC); edited 21:48, 19 January 2024 (UTC)